George Foreman Vs Oliver McCall/Ray Mercer

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Totentanz., Jul 2, 2024.


  1. Totentanz.

    Totentanz. Gator Wrestler Extraordinaire banned Full Member

    1,878
    2,256
    Jun 11, 2024
    Just was thinking about these two matches, I think that putting a young Foreman up against two iron chinned lads who would be able to fight back (Unlike Chuvalo) would make for fun exciting fights that could really go any way- What do you see happening?
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2024
  2. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,484
    17,982
    Jan 6, 2017
    Do you mean 90's Foreman? Ray Mercer was food for Old Foreman. He would have no answer the telephone pole jab, the thudding body shots, and the tight fortress guard. Mercer was wildly inconsistent. Even at his best, he lacked the combination of skill, technique, and power to really trouble Foreman and is giving up significant advantages in height, reach, experience, etc. Foreman wins a lopsided decision. Just beats him up at his own game. Mercer is a come forward slugger at heart and would not win using this method. He lacks the creativity to adjust his style the way Morrison did.

    McCall is a different conversation. He could be cautious, had good timing, and better fundamentals than Mercer. McCall was actually a pretty decent boxer, but could also be inconsistent and lost multiple fights he could've won. The main difference is, McCall was better at winning rounds and sticking to a game plan. He also wouldn't be on the front foot pressing the issue and could back off or go into his shell when hurt. I think Foreman would take the early rounds with his huge power, aggression, and physicality, McCall starts making adjustments slowing the pace down with mid range boxing and defense, then the late rounds are close with some ebb and flow. Not sure who wins, but the best version of McCall might pull off a narrow points win.
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,255
    80,378
    Aug 21, 2012
    I think they would give him good fights. Mercer at his best was maybe a little light in the pants for a prime Foreman. McCall might be a better match and in fact might make Foreman blow his wad trying to get him out of there which was Foreman's usual achilles heel.
     
  4. Usyk is the best

    Usyk is the best Active Member Full Member

    652
    1,137
    Feb 12, 2023
    I don't give McCall a better chance than Mercer. McCall was pretty basic and slow boxer, and I genuinely believe that at least until his 40s Mercer chin was not ANY worse than McCall's
     
  5. Totentanz.

    Totentanz. Gator Wrestler Extraordinaire banned Full Member

    1,878
    2,256
    Jun 11, 2024
    I meant a young Foreman, let me correct my original post. Never post at 4 in the morning. Lol
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  6. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,048
    11,561
    Sep 21, 2017
    I mean, it Foreman/Mercer could end up like Lewis/Mercer. Mercer hit as hard as Lyle and had a better chin. So Foreman would have to work fast in getting Mercer out of there.

    McCall also had enough size and power to deck Foreman, but I lean towards Foreman.