Langford is overrated

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Dorrian_Grey, Jul 30, 2024.


  1. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,768
    4,674
    Apr 20, 2024
    Yeah, I'll say it. Somebody has to. He's very overrated in how he's viewed historically. He's a great fighter, a HOFer, no doubt about it, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying he's a bum before anybody gets emotional. But he's not a P4P top 5 guy and he shouldn't be in the GOAT convo imo. Just look at his resume holistically and what's really that impressive about it? His best win is over an old Joe Gans who didn't hold the title, who he outweighed by 5 lbs, who fought a laboured decision the day before, was only a couple weeks removed from being beaten by Blackburn, and who had the wear and tear of 150 fights on him. That's Langford's best win and yeah it's Joe Gans but he wasn't anywhere close to his best, he was smaller than Sam, and fought the day before. Does anybody really think that getting punched in the head and having a tough six rounds right before fighting Sam really meant that Gans was in good condition for that fight? That's why the last week of camp for most major and minor fight these days isn't usually spent on hard sparring sessions. Think about the times you've had a tough gym session and how you felt the day after then try tell me that the Gans win was an ATG win.

    Now we have the win over the aforementioned Blackburn. Good win in all fairness. But it should also be pointed out that Blackburn also beat Langford the first time around (or should have at least) and that the second time around they drew in "a dreary farce" where Blackburn had dysentery. The third was another draw, the fourth a decision for Langford, the fifth another draw, and the sixth a NC because of the fight being a blatant fix. So Langford's record against Blackburn is 1-1-3-1. Langford never won the series with Blackburn and it's doubtful whether any of their fights were actually real.

    But what about Barbados Joe Walcott? Some reports claim Langford deserved the nod, some say Walcott deserved the nod, some say the draw was completely fair. Don't say 'arguably beat an ATG welter' because he didn't. He drew with a very good fighter and went life and death with him, was even on the verge of being KOed in the 13th.

    Ketchel was coming off of two losses and it's debatable whether Langford beat him or not since the reports suggest it could have gone either way. Ketchel was practically done by this point, Langford outweighed him by 19lbs and still went even Stevens with him more or less. There are claims Sam held back but these are hard to substantiate.

    The pair of wins over Willis are good but Sam also got beat up in the rest of the series for the most part.

    McVey, Jennette, and Flynn were good contenders and decent scalps. But let's be honest, how highly does anybody rate any of these guys when not bringing up Langford? Jennette beat him in the series too.

    Philly Jack O'Brien was shot to bits.

    Tiger Flowers was a good win but was green at that point and was always chinny.

    Langford never once defeated a reigning champion yet some claim is a top 5 P4P fighter. If the colour line was so impactful to his career then why did he receive a title shot against Walcott? Why is it that all his best wins are against black champions (Gans, Flowers, and Blackburn)? Levinsky, Ketchel, and O'Brien never had any qualms about fighting black fighters so why deny Langford a shot at the title? Maybe it was because Langford was too inconsistent and never established himself as the clear best contender at the time. It's good that Langford's career and legacy have been revived and appreciated after being all but forgotten but I think many have gone overboard in their romantic view of a dangerous and ducked black contender who would fight anybody at any weight any time and would do so even when he was blind. It's a very convincing story and would make for a good movie. But let's not mix stories for reality. You don't get ranked based on who ducked you (if that were the case then, ****, I guess Golovkin must be the greatest MW ever huh?), you're ranked by how good your wins are or how good look on film. Langford fails to have a genuine claim to being the GOAT with either metric. Langford was a great fighter, but he not as great as some make him out to be.

    Okay, rant over, you can yell at me now.
     
    OddR and themaster458 like this.
  2. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    You gotta mention Golovkin, huh ?

    Jk.. I support opinions that are out of the box, but seems like he needs to be ranked very high first in order to be overrated (nobody really rankns him above Robinson or inside the top 3, I believe). Who ranks him as the GOAT ?
    If you´ve said Henry Armstrong is overrated, I think I would go with you ! But Langford ?
     
  3. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,741
    5,955
    Aug 27, 2020
    Yeah, no. Gans may not have been at his absolute best condition due to his 6 rounder with Holly the previous day, but he was absolutely not old. He had beaten Erne and McFadden the previous year and would go on to beat the likes of Nelson, Britt and the much bigger Sullivan later on. Just because he lost to Blackburn a month prior and had many fights doesn't prove he was old.

    Not to mention, Langford was a high school aged teenager when he beat him, not by just being a better conditioned athlete, but by actually outboxing him and outhinking him. Gans was considered by many to be the gold standard for scientific Boxers, and here comes this 17 year old who proves to be his equal in that regard. It is absolutely an ATG win.

    A lot of fights that went the distance during that era were automatically scored as draws, you'll notice it a lot in comparison to even the 1920's. Just pointing out his record against Blackburn is kind of meaningless here, it does not tell us anything. Also, how was a 23 year old Ketchel just about done ? Because he lost to the best Heavyweight of his era and because he hadn't trained properly against one of the greatest Middleweights ever in Frank Klaus ? Not buying it.

    If Pacquiao went 2-13-2 against a prime Beterbiev, with those 2 wins being KO's, and half of the losses being when Pac was past his prime and half blind, would you not be impressed ? Because that just about sums up Langford's rivalry with Wills, except Wills is a far far more accomplished fighter than Beterbiev will ever be.

    Jeannette and McVey were more than just decent scalps who are not worth much without Langford. Jeannette beat most of the top names of the era, like Sandy Ferguson, Battling Jim Johnson, Jeff Clark, Young Peter Jackson, Bill Tate, Georges Carpentier, Langford himself as well as McVey. McVey himself has wins over Jeannette and Langford, as well as Denver Ed Martin, Jeff Clark and Harry Wills. Both of them would have been near the top 5 of Ali's best wins. And Langford beat them an ungodly amount of times.

    Also come on, are you really going to pull the ''he was green'' card on Flowers while Langford was older than Arcel and blinder than Greb ?

    You're also just kind of scratching the surface of Langford's resume. What about McFadden, Willie Lewis, Dave Holly, Young Peter Jackson, Larry Temple, Sandy Ferguson, Klondike Haynes, Dixie Kid, Jeff Clark, Bill Lang, Gunboat Smith, Bill Tate, Kid Norfolk, Terry Kellar and George Godfrey ?
     
  4. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,871
    7,739
    Jun 10, 2024
    No one will deny that Gans likely wasn't at his 100% best for this fight, but he was still an already-established ATG & reigning LW champ who would go on to score more big wins afterward, while Langford was in his first known fight of any significance & conceding a huge deficit in experience.

    BJW was far more than just "a very good fighter," he was an ATG/HoFer in his own right who also competed vs. HWs.

    He was already into his 30s when the series began & was suffering from a detached retina/vision loss after a few fights into the series.

    McVey & Jennette were regarded as great fighters in their own day & are HoF inductees.

    Flynn is remembered outside of the Langford fights as being the only fighter ever to stop Dempsey.

    Flowers was no more "green" than Langford was at the time of his win over Gans that you downplayed, & Langford was much farther removed from his best (he was virtually blind by this time) than Gans was from his when he fought Langford.

    This is again untrue, Gans was the reigning LW champ when Langford beat him.

    Nope, he was readily acknowledged as being one of the best fighters in the world even in his own day.

    The NY Times published an article on December 23, 1913, titled "NEGRO'S SUPREMACY IN RING NEAR END; Johnson, Langford, McVea, and Jeannette Are Deteriorating Rapidly as Boxers," which opens by saying, "The supremacy of the negro in pugilism, which has not been disputed since Jack Johnson won the heavyweight title from Tommy Burns at Sydney five years ago, unless by those who took hope in Jeffries's return to the ring, seems to be at at end." It goes on to acknowledge that Langford (& other black HWs) used "to inspire terror among the whites" & unequivocally states, "It was the general impression up to the time of the Smith bout that Langford was the class among all heavyweights, white or black."
     
  5. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,768
    4,674
    Apr 20, 2024
    Don't worry, I'm with you on the Armstrong thing too. A number of posters ranked him top 3 here: https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/who-else-is-qualified-for-the-status-of-goat.720372/page-3 Here as well: https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/is-sam-langford-the-goat.671680/ Here too: https://www.*******.com/forums/boxi...9-the-top-20-all-time-greatest-p4p-list/page5
     
  6. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    Oh, okay. Yeah, I mean, calling him overrated seems wrong anyway... but in here, in our classic bf24 world? I guess he did became a little "overvalued", but we are countering "mainstream classic media" that never gave him his right props, probably (ESPN, Ring, Bert Sugar etc).... I feel that we do that regarding Ezzard Charles also...
     
    Dorrian_Grey likes this.
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Flowers had 35 fights under his belt and Langford was nearly blind.

    Gans was the reigning Lightweight champ and 28 years old when Langford beat him.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2024
  8. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,768
    4,674
    Apr 20, 2024
    Gans wasn't the lineal LW champ when he fought Langford though. Blackburn had already beaten him for the claim to the lineage even if the title wasn't on the line. Blackburn was the man who beat the man and therefore, the way I see it, Gans was no longer the champ when he fought Langford. I don't see anything that refutes the claim that Langford is vastly overrated proportionate to what he actually accomplished or who he actually beat when he beat them.
     
  9. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,372
    3,846
    Jan 6, 2024
    Langford is the shortest HW champ ever and the one with the longest career. Theres his case right there. Langford spent the vast majority of that career at HW and has a 71% KO rate.


    In terms of him fighting HW white fighters Langfords record against them is at least 39-5-4. This is an incomplete stat in terms of wins(his resume is too long to discern the ethnicity of every single opponent I haven't heard of). I'm pretty sure I've got all the losses though(Fulton x2, Flynn, Gunboat Smith and Meehan). This did not count the O Brien or Ketchel fights which weren't at HW but those guys were both HW contenders. Anyhow Langfords probably got 50 wins over white fighters if we scour his entire resume.

    Theres also the issue of Langfords belts that some people refuse to acknowledge. But they happened. "Why did no one give him a title shot". Many considered him the real HW champ for 5 years and he got title shots from the NSC and IBU in 1909 and 1913. Jack Johnson didn't fight him. At Langfords rate of activity he eventually took losses which led to his claims petering out. And that was that.

    Now did Langford fight any of the best HWs of the late 10s except Wills and Fulton who he lost to most times? No he really didn't. But he was probably the best HW for 5 plus years. Also while he lost most of those fights he KOd Wills twice. No one else in the P4P discussion has that.

    In terms of Ketchel being "done" he was 23. After losing to Langford Ketchel ended his career on a 3 fight win streak. He was then murdered at the age of 24. His 3 fight losing streak were a HW title fight where he gave up 30 pounds and 2 6 round decisions to Klaus and Langford. The latter of which like you said was competitve. Theres nothing to indicate that Ketchel was "done". If not for the whole dying thing he had a decade of MW and eventually LHW campaigning ahead.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2024
  10. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,475
    4,908
    Aug 19, 2010
    Yes, he stopped Flowers... as did other guys before Langford.... it is a good win based on him being blind... not on the fact that Flowers was a unbeatable force at the time.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,126
    44,867
    Mar 3, 2019
    There's some clear double standards here.

    Why do you so clearly trust the reports for the Walcott fight but not the Ketchel right? If you're gonna treat a result as a result, then Langford has a draw with Walcott and a win over Ketchel.

    It seems like you're trying to diminish the Ketchel win by saying Ketchel was outweighed by 19lbs, but then why use the Wills fights as a negative when Langford was outweighed in literally all of them? And if Ketchel win isn't as impressive because was 'practically done at this point', why not say the same of Langford when he faced Wills? He was six years older, 20lbs smaller naturally, and had been in far fights than Wills.

    Also, how can you make an entire thread about why he isn't a top P4P fighter, and not mentioned the fact he moved from 140 to HW?
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Blackburn was 138lbs when he won the NWS decision over Gans,that's why Gans retained his title
     
    Dorrian_Grey and bolo specialist like this.
  13. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,768
    4,674
    Apr 20, 2024
    He also gets put 6th place on IBRO's all-time top 25: https://ibroresearch.com/ibro-all-time-ratings-2006/
    Bleacher Report has him top 10:
    This content is protected

    ESPN has him top 10: https://www.espn.com/sports/boxing/greatest/featureVideo?page=greatest110 And later says he's top 5: https://www.espn.co.uk/espn/blackhistory2007/news/story?id=2755803
    Even The Ring says he has a claim to being the GOAT: "Some boxing historians consider the Nova Scotia native, who fought 314 times during his 24-year pro career, to be the GOAT. I believe the argument can be made." https://www.ringtv.com/610139-dougi...s-sam-langford-nico-hernandez-wilfredo-gomez/
    Bert Sugar listed Langford 16th on that awful top 100 list he did in the early 2000s btw.
     
    Vic-JofreBRASIL likes this.
  14. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,776
    8,362
    Dec 18, 2022
    Gans also battered Blackburn in every fight they had afterward
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,863
    81,829
    Nov 30, 2006
    @Dorrian_Grey woke up this morning and chose violence in the Classic Forum. :lol: