Scored it 8-4...Crawford last night. After rewatching realized I was wrong.

Yeah, bud was in total control 90% of the fight. People see things all wrong, then get gassed up by trolls who make them believe their own bull. Next thing you know there’s a whole alternate reality bubble thinking they got an argument. It’s a recurring theme.

 

Well you're in the minority, it was a close fight

 

The judges don't get to rewatch it

 

Yeah I thought Sergio mora was trippin acting like Madrimov was putting it on him most of the fight . I didn’t see that I had Crawford clearly winning

 

It's refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong...because there thousands of dumb mother****ers out there who still think they are right.

Your boxing IQ will improve drastically over the long term with the knowledge you will pick up by admitting this to yourself now.

All the other mother****ers are never going to know **** and just love being bitter about something...so it don't matter in the long run.

 

This is the same situation as Haney vs Loma - a very vocal group claiming Haney clearly won, when any objective person can see that Loma won. Crawford vs Madrimov was a closer fight so scoring it 10-2 requires complete bias.

To set the record straight - boxing is completely corrupt and the promoters and governing bodies decide the world champions. There are a group of overrated A-siders whose records are padded with cherry picks, judging gifts, and are sanctioned to be as inactive as suits their avoidance strategy. Canelo and Floyd are at the top of the list. Add Ward, Bradley, Haney, Teo, Tank, Charlos, and after Saturday, one can now add Crawford to that list. He passes the eye test, but his record is so padded that it is no longer funny.

 

Such a stupid comment. Almost all objective people says Crawford legitimately won a close fight. The majority think he won. Nothing like Haney/Loma. Keep Crawfords name out of that list of privileged A side fighters, the score cards were just fine. They were close and reflected the fight correctly.

115-113
116-112
115-113

 

There are quite a few who don.t like Bud but maybe the reason why some had Madrimov winning is b/c he fought a much better fight than what many thought he was capable of.
It was his 11th pro fight after all and he did make the Crawdad look human at times.... which is something he hasn't looked in a while.

 

I havent seen the fight but maybe it a case of "Madrinov wasnt expected to do much so we are giving him more credit than he deserves?" like when Hagler and Leonard fought in my case. I thought Sugar Ray was at risk of actually dying there, his eye and all.l And I ended up scoring it for him that night, 118-111.

Now Im more in the 114-114 range.

 

You beat me to it!

 

Yeah you're absolutely right. He was only feinting all night, he doesn't want to engage and people said he won. Yeah, they won't re-watch the match but they'll argue with you a million times more.

Any one objective enough knew whenever madrimov came out of his shell, Crawford made him pay. Apart from the single straights , I never saw anything special. He got wobbled several times but clinched immediately