Best heavyweight fighters by attributes currently

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Aug 25, 2024.


  1. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    He was a tank back then and you have no idea how he would fare in the pros against Cammarelle because the later never turned pro.
     
  2. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    He was far thinner, you can`t tell anything from a three round amateur fight, most olympic matches are crap.
     
  3. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    He had to stay close because of the difference in reach, he had a hard time hitting Fury to the head and landed most of his shots to the body.
     
  4. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    Thinner but he was still a huge unit back then and evidently you can tell something from a three round amateur fight because you managed to deduce that Big Bang would destroy him now from that

    Cammarelle stopped him with big gloves and headgear on
     
  5. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    You're just talking out of your ass again, mark. You've been doing it throughout the thread and the stench of it in this thread is so bad now I can even smell it on other threads on the front page too

    Usyk stood right in front of Belly and walked him down, this was not the usual elusive Usyk
     
  6. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    No way could he beat Fury on the outside, too tall, long plus he has speed.
     
  7. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    Zhang is proven in the pros, very few olympians could have beaten the pro version of him.
     
  8. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    You have no idea what you're talking about. That's like saying Big Bang could never have beaten Big Joe Joyce and The Dosser had he never turned pro like Cammarelle didn't. You're the only one who is talking about Big Bang vs the amateur version of Cammarelle who beat him
     
  9. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    Belly would struggle to land much at all on the mobile much more elusive version of Usyk. The reason he was able to land on him as much as he did is, again.. for the umpteenth time, is because of the tactics Usyk employed and Usyk's legs might not be what they once were
     
  10. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    Well in my opinion you`re wrong.
     
  11. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    I don`t think the amateur version of Zhang could have beaten those two.
     
  12. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    The stench of your ass has not only spread to other threads on the front page but I can even smell it in some of the other subforums on here too now, such is the amount of poop you've been chatting
     
  13. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,636
    130,142
    Jul 21, 2009
    And Big Bang wouldn't be fighting the amateur version of Cammarelle if they fought now
     
  14. Power_tek

    Power_tek Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,739
    6,684
    Sep 22, 2018
    I definitely saw him on his back holding his nut sack, you are right that it was ruled low and I can see it being called legit on another day, but he wasn’t hit anywhere near his sack, not that it’s relevant here like
     
  15. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,528
    3,499
    May 17, 2023
    What was Cammarell`s main combo?