A weird attempt at deflection. It's a win on Fury's record and crying won't change it. At the end of the day the judges and referees have the final, official, say.
"I'm not debating with someone that believes the fight was a draw or a Fury win that's a "you" problem with your biased take I'm afraid that I simply can't be bothered to get into because the scoring speaks for itself." Then you proceed to carry on for a few paragraphs. You know more than official judges then, your knowledge supersedes theirs, thatta boy.
It's not relevant. It just shows the argument that official judges always have more knowledge is not always correct.
I'd wager they're more knowledgeable than most here though as they're the ones doing it for a living.
I'm sure you check Fury's record on BoxRec daily in the hope a 2nd knockdown will magically appear against his fight against Ngannou. Good luck with that. In the meantime you will just have to keep on pretending.
No I just find it hilarious you and @Kiwi Casual cope so much defending Fury's knockdown vs an MMA fighter the dedication is real. The only Heavyweights I like are Zhang and Usyk I could careless about any of the others.
Yeah because the official scorecards are never wrong..... Lewis vs Holyfield 1, Whitaker vs Chavez, and countless other examples. Anyone who scored 7 rounds for Fury should never be allowed to judge another big fight end of.
Not defending the knockdown at all. Fury was knocked down from a left hook in the 3rd round. That you find it necessary to pretend there was a second knockdown is what you are getting push back on and rightly so.
No I'm disputing that a 2nd legit knockdown wasn't correctly called hence making a difference to the "official result"