"Tommy Morrison being the object of all your sporting affection and plaudits" This is my first ever thread about Morrison and likely my last. I haven't searched your posts but judging from this thread you have posted vastly more about Morrison over the years than I have. Ironically, the obsessive energy of Morrison's detractors helps to keep him far more relevant than the likes of Izon, Melito et al.
The only place Morrison is "relevant" is in the most niche of circles, kept alive by people like you, who can't seem to find a better human being to cheerlead. Dude is a never was to boot. Stop propping him up.
Hey man, this is a boxing forum yeah? This is a thread that asked people opinions on Tommy Morrison...and people are doing that. Was he a flawed human being? Undoubtedly. But the OP didn't ask that, did he? Will we only discuss human beings with flawless personalities, because brother, it would be slim pickings believe me. Hey, you don't like him, and don't rate him, and that's cool. Your opinion is as relevant as mine or anyone else's. But nobody is 'propping' him, or looking for someone to cheer..we're only answering a question about a boxer. On a boxing forum. Because we are boxing fans. Have a wonderful day brother man, peace and love, gbn x
"a better human being to cheerlead." I have merely stated the facts as I see them but this is funny considering that Jake Paul is considered the "bad guy" by most boxing fans in a matchup against a convicted sex criminal and ear mutilator.
Paul is new age garbage, doing anything to make a quick buck and get "clout". Tyson has never advertised himself as anything particularly positive, and has admitted to all sorts of awful ****. But what do either have to do with Morrison?
Foreman fight was his best win now, as far as his career goes, had a little talent, but he wasn’t elite so he was a glorified titleholder which isn’t bad.
It's easy to make a case for Morrison not being a top 10 heavyweight at any point in his career as rankings are highly subjective and based on guesswork. His best win Foreman had controversial wins over Savarese and Schulz that many feel he lost and nobody considers either world class Dominic Breazeale was briefly ranked in the top 10 but most would dispute that rating
The Schulz fight wasn't close, it was an outright robbery. Foreman brought in too much money during his comeback to fail against someone like Schulz.
"Tyson has never advertised himself as anything particularly positive" I'm not a Tyson expert but I recall this not being true. The media, with Tyson's co-operation, were very keen to portray him as a "former street kid with a heart of gold". My point is that boxing isn't the place to look for high ethical standards and most boxing fans are inconsistent here. Morrison being a bad guy (and no one forced those women to have unprotected sex with him) has nothing to do with his boxing ability or accomplishments.
I'd say it's easier to make the case that literally ten of his contemporaries who were also top 10 ranked had less right to be there than he did. Those fights were about 2+ years later and after Foreman had jumped to No.1 in the rankings when he beat Moorer. The anti-Morrison invective generally isn't coming from a rational position, it's because he was a "bad person" or whatever.
Challenge accepted (I think you can make a good case for the following guys ahead of Morrison for the following years based on ability) 1991 Holyfield Tyson Lewis Bowe McCall Mercer Foreman Witherspoon Ruddock Moorer Tubbs Tucker Sanders (1992) Bowe Lewis Holyfield Ruddock Holmes Mercer Moorer Tucker Tubbs Bruno Sanders (1993) Lewis Holyfield Bowe Tucker Sanders Bruno Akinwande McCall Hunter Moorer (1994) Lewis Holyfield Bowe McCall Moorer Akinwande Hunter Zolkin Bruno Witherspoon Foreman (questionable, beat Moorer but seems to have been fluke based on his other performances) (1995) Lewis Holyfield Tyson Bowe McCall Akinwande Witherspoon Zolkin Sanders Donald And I feel I'm giving Morrison the benefit of the doubt here in assuming he's better than Izon, Savarese, Schulz, etc.
Tucker was basically relevant until losing to Akinwande in 1995. Seldon was also a lock for 95 after beating Tucker. Golota also has a case for 95. And you forgot about Holmes, who would've wiped his ass with Morrison in any of these years.
Morrison was no different than all the other WBO Heavyweight titleholders in the early and mid 90’s. Not elite but also not terrible. Somewhere in the middle.
A glass cannon similar to Wilder and Shannon Briggs. Would probably put him below both in terms of levels, definetly below Wilder.
Briggs is one of the most overrated HW's imo: https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/shannon-briggs-career-analysis.729096/