But I did prove it. It's there, in black and white. I also showed you that you didn't display humility as you claimed - but at least you've replied - "yeah sure". I'm not trying to be cruel - I just have to highlight it when you're absolutely not making sense. I haven't been thoroughly bested, but if it placates you, who am I to stop you indulging in such fantasy. I don't need to read it again. I read you just fine - my reply was exactly on point.
Hardly MM. But you keep dreaming the dream in your head. Linking a video clip of another fight altogether is just about as on point as you have been throughout the discussion. Actually, a terrific example of good refereeing. The guy is obviously dead to the world, and even after he begins punching in the air, the ref persists with his count before calling it. Of course, the ref had the discretionary right to do so - therefore, it must have been the right thing to do. Great example. We know whose lights are actually OUT. Thanks for that.
We sure do. It's the guy falling about with no option but to double down on his litany of logical fallacies - doing again exactly what I have called you out for doing - and, so much so, it's not even worth defending against now. You're just punching at air.
I know you believe that, hence why I'm correcting you in as civil a way as possible. Nothing you do would be considered cruel, because of your nature. In that case I'm glad you agree and therefore I agree with your agreement.
As I said, keep dreaming the dream in your head. You are still trying to defend and just as unsuccessfully as you have been throughout the discussion. The lights went out on you and your position some time back.
Luf, you really do need to stop not making sense. One of my favorites is that the referee didn't intervene due to Fury being at risk of serious or permanent injury, but...because Fury didn't suffer serious or permanent injury, the referee was proven to have made the right call when he did intervene. Now that's thinking outside the box! Edward de Bono would be proud.
Defend against what, exactly? You’ve added nothing but the same empty rhetoric since the beginning. Looking back, I never really needed to 'defend' my position because you never once addressed the actual argument. In your last few posts, you’ve only reinforced what we already knew about your approach to debate. So, what’s left to defend? You’re just a wheel of nonsense spinning in free space. Well done, you’ve successfully knocked out arguments that only ever existed in your own imagination. A real masterclass in shadowboxing.
Oh bless you I realise your mistake now, it's a comprehension issue. Go back and read the posts quick before you go further into this hole. I've broken it down as slow as I can for you, in the name of civility, so give it a re read, understand your issue and then slowly back away like Homer.
Lots of refs stop a normal match by 1:19 of the video, let alone 1:34 - can't say Nelson was remiss in not stopping it, but he did give Fury benefit of the doubt beyond what many fighters would get.
Your lack of self awareness is simply astonishing. Multiple posters have already proven you wrong. Your inability to come to terms with that, along with your lack of humility, isn't my problem. But hey, it's not you who's wrong, it's everyone else right?
Well, yet again, that was a lot of hot air laced with your usual, acutely false narratives. Well divorced from the facts. Very desperate and still very much lost in the forest. Maybe you need to hug a tree.
Okay Luf, prove you wrong and your show of humility is blinding. You’ve haven’t broken anything down - but, by all means, keep repeating that you did, mantra like - if that helps you.
I’ve already answered and refuted the multiple poster claim - but just keep repeating yourself without meat - it’s what you do. Trolling in. You’re the last person to be talking about humility - as I’ve already highlighted in due detail.