Tyson Fury's controversial tactics against Usyk exposed!

Yeah the fat archetype in that game doesn’t do Fury’s body justice, not enough of an emphasis on his egg-ness with skinny limbs

 

No man born of woman has quite the same shape as Fury.

 

Some clown who has never been in a boxing ring is SHOCKED that an orthodox and southpaw are having a lead foot battle!

Why is YouTube full of these dorks

 

I don't think anything you're saying negates anything I'm saying, nor would I disagree with any of this, off the top of my head. My comment wasn't true only to an extent though-it was just completely true. Patterson and Louis may've been very clean, but let's not forget they also punched the crap out of people. A lot of their victims would trade places with Fury's victim's any day, making them worse, to an extent.

 

Bob Arum confirmed the contracts were signed, but then Fury needed to back out and fight Wilder as he lost the arbitration. Fury announced the fight as well.

 

It was true only to an extent. I supplied greater/more appropriate context for due and more accurate comparative/relative measure.

 

Bob arum said as far as he knows everyone has agreed, but things still signed. That's all I could find. I never seen any proof that Aj signed an actual contract

Was there perhaps another report showing Ajs signature?

Anyway, it's ancient history, Aj isn't relevant right now. Maybe Fury will no longer be relevant either in a matter of days

 

Haha right on point! In the end I don't know why people blame Fury - it is part of the sport.

 

For some reason I can't post a link, but have a search for a Boxing Scene article "Report: Tyson Fury, Anthony Joshua Sides Have Signed Off On 2-Fight Deal; Date, Site TBD".

And then their fight will be relevant again, which makes AJ relevant as well.

 

Nobody but casuals care about a couple of losers fighting years past their best (at least in furys case)

Floyd and manny were still on top and that was much too late
Aj should have signed to fight Dubois, but he knows he will lose, so I'm guessing he will cash out

 

Well, if AJ beats Fury or the other way around, that kinda seals it when it comes to their all time rankings. I personally don't think this will ever take place and I would much rather see AJ against Wilder.

 

As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangst... wait, no wrong forum. Far as I remember stepping on someone's foot is not explicitly against written rules just generally considered gamesmanship.

It's an absolute must for skilled southpaws cause mirrored feet will naturally get tangled and you obviously don't want to be under and getting it, you want to be over and giving it. Bit like love making, just under Mauricio Sulaiman's supervision with three slightly bent judges scoring.

 

I hate fights when they fight past their prime

Floyd beat manny and all I ever hear or read, is what would of happened had they fought in 09 or 2010

I know the saying better late than never, but sometimes it's best left

Anyway, if Fury gets beat he may want to cash out vs Aj

 

Your context proved a level of correctosity that has no greater extent. They call this Boxed's Law. When something is at the greatest extent to which it can be on a forum, no parameters of extension may be placed on it, which denote likelihoods of further extension.

i thought everyone knew this, noob.

 

Pug’s Theory (PT) superseded Boxed’s Law (BL) some time back.

You should’ve kept your Ears out for it.

BL wasn’t bad but there were holes that PT puttied up, ultimately providing all the right answers every time, including those that BL notably failed to deliver.

They should still teach BL in schools alongside PT to illustrate the evolutionary progress in man’s improved thinking - but there will be no further steps beyond PT as it is the alpha to the omega - in laymen’s terms, PT is all she (he in this instance) wrote.