Good big man always beats good little man

Except that time that he didn't.

 

A good big man never beats an exceptional little man!

 

But last time good big man lost to good little man?

 

If Fury wins, there will be a 3rd fight, which will make Usyk and Fury even richer.

This is professional boxing, right? The fighters aim for maximum profit. Thus, I think Usyk will take a dive, or judges will rob Usyk.

This is Fury's endgame. Fury will win tonight by decision.

 

Why be so negative when you don't even know the result yet? Wait for the fight and then analyze if Usyk was robbed or not. Otherwise, this kind of narrative will prevent Fury from getting his flowers if he wins on points, even if he won fair and square.

 

Fury is good Usyk is great that's the difference.

 

You do realize this fight is a rematch and that usyk, the little man, beat the big man the first time out. Please, explain how you can make a post like you did. Where's the logic?

 

Looking forward to this aging like milk in the hot sun.

 

So that I can say "I told you so" after the fight, if my theories come true : )

 

I agree, a good big man “should” beat a good small man but in this case it’s a good big man against a great little man, the outcome changes in that case.

 

So Fury had these same advantages last time and got his **** rocked. Lol he may win but it will be because he learns from the last fight and not because of his physical stature.

 

Except when he didn’t, right?

 

Another hyperbolic statement from an account that's still wet behind the ears

 

Except when the big man partied too much