No, Usyk should not have to keep fighting these British giants twice or more he's already had to rematch Belly and AJ after soundly beating them, on a deck heavily stacked in their favour in AJ's case, and he beat Dubois even more conclusively than he beat either of them. They were going to give AJ a third crack at beating Usyk had he got past Dubois and talk of Usyk vs Belly III started not long after the final bell. If you want to talk controversial moments look no further than Dubois vs Lerena and Dubous vs Hrgovic and neither of those were offered rematches. He should've been DQ'd against Hrgovic for the 20+ billy goat butts he carved Hrgovic's eyes up with and the fact the fight was stopped on cuts which were sure as hell caused by the butts only makes it more disgraceful. That got completely ignored by all but a handful on forums as did round 1 of Dubois vs Lerena ending 10 seconds early when Dubois had been down x 3 and was in desperate trouble. The British boxing media were as silent as church mice about that And look how eager the ref was to wave it off right at the end of the round when Lerena had been hurt and was in trouble and one of those shots landed after the bell too IIRC. Had the roles been reversed the ref would've sent Dubois back to his corner and given him a chance to recover during the 60 second interval so spare me they need to run it back after the blow blow incident, of which their were many. Usyk completely dominated Dubois and then when he put his foot on the gas and upped the pressure he dropped him x 2 and simultaneously finished him with a JTFO KO and a No mas which are the two most prestigious forms of victory there is. I don't care if Dubois has earned a rematch with his current run of wins. Go give Hrgovic and Lerena rematches first before you dare knock on the King's door. Usyk is the real champ not the paper one who was gifted his belt And how dare you climb into the ring and disrespect the King during his post-fight interview whilst he was paying tribute to his sons. We already had AJ steal Usyk's moment from him with his post-fight meltdown after Usyk had just achieved his dream.
I mean ... who else? No need for AJ or Fury or Wilder Beat Hunter in CW It's time to start clearing out the kids, but, Wardley? He's just not earned it man, he's a baby. Zhang? Sure, just because he hasn't done it to Zhang yet that makes that a better fight? Pretty sure Danny's a spot faster than Zhang, has better stamina, and youth. He can do a uni with Pulev but that's not a better fight either. Bakole? Kabayel? Maybe, but like Wardley that's a bit early for those dudes. Usyk has no challengers. All these challengers are a farce. There's not really any name that can be brought to the table that should have anyone question if Usyk can wear them down. ... ... Maybe Parker but honestly beating two old bruisers who basically just stand there to be hit isn't much gauge for Usyk. IMO, Usyk should have fun. Go take BW because you can. See if you can get a catchweight with Canelo or Beterbiev or some such. Retire a belt just to pick it back up and technically be a x2 champion that never lost ... ... ... I don't hate that. I like it more than him going to CW or BW or doing a catch with a name from the lighter weights. I love Beter, 0 chance in hell he can beat Usyk. Danny doesn't have much chance, but all things considered, I think he's the best chance to pull the upset. The dude has just dominated on that Marciano level and like Marciano he hasn't much to do so he'll go fight the lessers. Today a world fighting a regional is unheard of but also today we have regular for that. I promise Rock wouldn't have fought Cockell if there was a HW worth fighting left. Usyk's there man. No one left in boxing.
I don't want to see it again. It's not like the first time they fought it was close. Usyk dominated him. Only reason people still talk about that fight is because of the controversy around the punch that put Usyk on his backside. Everyone and there mother knows it was a low blow now. Saying that it would be a easy way to earn some money so if the fight does happen I'm for sure going all out on the Usyk win.
Yeah but Golota was dominating Bowe even before the low blows it was clear at that point in their careers Golota was the superior fighter. In the 16 rounds Bowe fought vs Golota he won about 3 without the low blow point deductions. Dubois on the other hand got pretty much dominated by Usyk and quit after a jab and at most Dubois won 1 round if that. I'd rather see a new opponent a new stylistic challenge for Usyk rather than rematching another British fighter for the 3rd time who he already beat comprehensively.
If he beats Parker and that's a big if because i make that close to a 50/50 match up. But I am bit tired of seeing rematches honestly so I'm kinda hoping Parker wins I want to see a new fresh contender face Usyk.
The only people that want the rematch are the ones still complaining about the "low blow" controversy but keep ignoring the fact that the fight itself was one sided and Dubois folded after a jab. Unless Dubois beats Parker I honestly don't think he's more deserving of a shot against Usyk over anyone else. The results would certainly not be anymore different should they fight again and I think Usyk will most likely batter Dubois even worse.
But that fight is happening next isn't it. Dubois v Parker. So the winner of that is easily the best fight for Usyk to make. Next best is winner of Kabayel v Zhang.
Which he's been doing his whole career. A Dubois rematch is only necessary if he beats Parker. But I don't blame anyone for not being overexcited to see another fight between the two given the one sided nature of their first fight. At least Parker is a different fighter that Usyk hasn't faced yet.
Yes and Parker would be the best if he beats Dubois which I'd rather see as Parker is a new opponent who we don't know how well Usyk matches up with hence its more of an intriguing match up.
I'm 50/50 on it, there really is not an obvious better choice Assuming Dubois beats Parker w/o controversy Reasons for: Dubois would have the best run of any heavyweight especially if he stops Parker. He would be IBF champ, a lucrative opponent in SA or UK, and the fight can be sold w/ the controversy of the first fight (not weighing in on the blow) but there is buzz and dubois has looked great since the loss. Also, despite Dubois being well behind on the cards and stopped I felt he performed well and brings attributes to the fight that can make him interesting. Also, Usyk is on his way out and Dubois is a young star where a victory could build a next generation champion rather than a retirement scenario. Reasons against: Usyk is a clear favorite, sure I felt Dubois did good and has improved and is worthy but I still think on top of all of that, Usyk is still the clear favorite here. Do I want to see a "maybe he does better the second time" fight, not really. I am not that enthusiastic about the fight but it sort of is a who is out there? If not Dubois? Kabayel and Zhang are tied up but certainly the winner is very deserving Bakole is high in the WBA and beat Anderson but is that really enough to be next? WBC has Okolie 4, no real interest from me WBC has Hunni and Itauma in the top 10 neither are ready Ajagba is still rated highly, no one wants to see that Pulev, no way Fury III no thanks So w/ that said I would have to favor Dubois as next in line with Kabayel-Zhang as next best. However, if Parker beats Dubois which is very possible, I think his streak of Wilder-Zhang-Dubois is the trump card and he should be next. Honestly that is probably the best result as to avoid rematches.