Prime Crawford vs prime Pacquiao and prime Trinidad @147

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Nov 24, 2024.


Who wins ?

This poll will close on Aug 22, 2027 at 12:03 AM.
  1. Crawford beats both

    34.4%
  2. Pacquiao beats Crawford

    36.1%
  3. Trinidad beats Crawford

    11.5%
  4. Both beat Crawford

    24.6%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    made no difference in how the fight went. his cheating was equivalent to using old glove laces, when the rules say they should be new.
     
  2. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,692
    3,580
    May 17, 2023
    You`re biased.
     
  3. Dannymita

    Dannymita Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,999
    9,761
    Jan 21, 2019
    Crawfords almost 40 and I still don't know how good he was or is lol.. I'll take Felix n 2009 pacman
     
    BoxingIQ likes this.
  4. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,692
    3,580
    May 17, 2023
    Bud is a better finisher than Manny was at 147 and he`s a good switch-hitter.
     
  5. Dannymita

    Dannymita Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,999
    9,761
    Jan 21, 2019
    And 2009 manny was a force of nature...id fancy him to batter crawford
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  6. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,692
    3,580
    May 17, 2023
    Batter? He never beat a dangerous welter like Bud, Bud has a 74 inch reach and Cotto only had a 67 inch reach, Manny was an extremely small welter.
     
  7. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    towards what?
     
  8. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,692
    3,580
    May 17, 2023
    Your attitude towards Bud compared to Antonio isn`t based on logic it sems, you don`t like Bud, I don`t see anything special in Antonio, maybe you liked that era better.
     
  9. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    of course i liked that era better, im a boxing fan. that doesnt mean im gonna make up stuff to shape a narrative one way or the other. if you disagree on certain points, fine, it doesnt surprise me. you believe that guy fouts is a boxing genius, i think hes an idiot that dksab. we learned boxing from completely different sources.
     
    MagnificentMatt likes this.
  10. Dannymita

    Dannymita Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,999
    9,761
    Jan 21, 2019
    Yeah batter, crawfords a good fighter..but I can't say more than that because hes at the end of his career and I couldn't tell you how good he even is in an all time sense...n manny was a small welter because he wasn't a proper welter..ill take manny that battered cotto,battered margarito, battered dlh etc ..over Crawford ..100 times out of 100

    N Bud might have massive reach over him but even gamboas hobbit ass with his t rex arms could get to him
     
  11. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,692
    3,580
    May 17, 2023
    Have to disagree, I think figt fans are blinded by nostalgia.
     
  12. wayne189

    wayne189 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,215
    859
    Jul 8, 2013
    think tito could get up off the canvas and stop him in a thriller
     
  13. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,559
    2,194
    Nov 11, 2006
    You think Fouts is an idiot that dksab boxing because he doesn’t.

    Find me a successful coach with a strong pro or amateur team who talks about boxing like that ****ing dork (and many other Instagram/youtube boxing personalities)…..

    Clearly people who don’t understand what the pressure of competition and combat feels like or how real fighters prepare.
     
    bandeedo likes this.
  14. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    i agree. you have to be really clueless about boxing, to not see that he is completely clueless about boxing. and if you cant tell, that should tell you how much you really know about the subject.
     
  15. Eternal

    Eternal Active Member Full Member

    549
    402
    Aug 10, 2024
    Felix Trinidad is one of the most overrated fighters of all times, no way Crawford ever loses to that guy. The jr middleweight version of Trinidad was however better than the welterweight one.

    As for Manny Pacquiao, size does matter so that's why Crawford would win. You also have to consider that Pacquiao somehow did manage to lose to lousy Eric Morales so Crawford might even beat MP without a size advantage.