Yes he beat him bad. But that has nothing to do with the “public hating him” agenda. back then he would stubbornly speak about unnecessary and unacceptable provocative things….then he cries when people react
Ortiz 1 7 Ortiz 2 7 Stiverne1 7 Arreola 7 Duhaupas 7 Washington 7 Breazeale 7 Szpilka 7 Helenius 7 Molina 3 Harrison 2 Liakovich 2 Scott 1
We did, I certainly did for his boxing. he was one of the brightest stars. but the public never hated him then, they just wasn’t bothered about him and he does like to be centre of attention.
IMO Ortiz 1 Ortiz 2 Breazeale Stiverne 1 Duhaupas Washington Helenius Szpilka Stiverne 2 Scott I would guess the order could be changed around in some arguments but would think the 2 Ortiz wins would be at the top
This content is protected Good topic Wilder's top 10 wins aren't that bad. But Wilder's 10 title defenses are not good enough for Wilder to be ahead of consecutive title defenses: Ali (first reign), Frazier, Tyson, Lewis, Vitaly. This content is protected Nobody will remember Wilder's reign.
I mean, his top ten is Okay..., but that WBC stamp of approval is doing a lot of heavy lifting on Wilder's resume Compare his top 5/10 wins to some of his peers, Povetkin: 1. Chagaev 2. Huck 3. Whyte 1 4. Byrd (old) 5. Rahman (old) 6. Chambers 7. Perez 8. Wach 9. Price 10. Boswell Whyte: 1. Parker 2. Rivas (undefeated) 3. Chisora 1 4. Chisora 2 5. Povetkin 2 (old) 6.Browne (undefeated) 7. Franklin (undefeated) 8. Helenius 9. Allen (undefeated) 10. Wach Joseph Parker: 1. Ruiz Jr. (Undefeated) 2. Zhang 3. Wilder 4. Takam 5. Chisora 2 6. H. Fury (undefeated) 7. Chisora 1 8. Dimitrenko 9. Fa (undefeated) 10. Kean
The fact that scrub Duhaupas is in his top 7 victories says a lot about his "reign" as paper champion lol
Ortiz 1 8 Ortiz 2 8 Stiverne1 8 Duhaupas 8 Washington 8 Breazeale 8 Szpilka 8 Helenius 8 Arreola 7 Molina 3 Harrison 2 Liakovich 2 Scott 2 Stiverne II 1
That is a good post, and I was thinking something similar A world title or Undefeated record does fool alot of posters on here If a fighter is continually taking on top or better opposition, there is more chance of losing rather than sitting back and letting everyone else battle it out and then just looking to face the victor. If you know what I mean?