Rocky Marciano at 32 (Moore fight) vs Jersey Joe Walcott at 33 (Louis 1 fight)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Devon, Jan 29, 2025.


Who wins?

  1. Marciano KO/TKO

    75.0%
  2. Marciano PTS

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Walcott KO/TKO

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Walcott PTS

    25.0%
  1. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,474
    5,657
    Dec 31, 2018
    Who wins this matchup?
     
  2. GRIFFIN

    GRIFFIN "Speak softly and carry a big punch" Full Member

    85
    109
    Nov 7, 2024
    At this point in Marciano's career he had mastered his offense and was able to keep Moore on the defense for the whole fight. Walcott would definitely win the first couple rounds but Marciano will inevitably land the shots he needs to to knock him out. Marciano KO round 12.
     
    VanBasten and Devon like this.
  3. CooperKupp

    CooperKupp “B.. but they all playin NBA basketball again!” Full Member

    2,256
    4,777
    Aug 28, 2022
    Rocky would find a way. Like he always did.

    KO9
     
    Frankus, VanBasten and catchwtboxing like this.
  4. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,166
    21,185
    Sep 22, 2021
    I mean Walcott isn’t as good as Moore? IMO.
     
  5. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,753
    37,135
    Jul 4, 2014
    I'm not going to pick but I will say that Marciano had accumulated some horrific injuries, including the split nose, chronically bad back, the Shkor cut above his eye, and a bad elbow, I think the right one.

    Conversely, those who want to say that Walcott would win because "look what he did in their first fight..." Marciano fought half that fight blinded, so it really is a meaningless metric.

    I don't know. To me it's hard to say. I think Rocky but Walcott was great.
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  6. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    4,205
    Jan 6, 2024
    Marciano never fought a fighter on 1947 Walcotts level IMO except maybe Moore.

    If he almost lost to the Walcott he almost lost to that is not a good sign.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef, mcvey and Reinhardt like this.
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,733
    21,986
    Sep 15, 2009
    Marciano ko. Next.
     
    VanBasten likes this.
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    No,at heavyweight he was better.
     
    Stevie G and Fergy like this.
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Not half the fight, and the blindness was caused by his own corner allowing medication to run into his eyes,when they tried to stop the scalp cut Rocky got from butting Walcott's eye.
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  10. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,517
    3,115
    Feb 17, 2008
    That bad back was plain to see in that Moore fight. It won't be getting better in subsequent fights, but worse.
     
  11. Pedro_El_Chef

    Pedro_El_Chef Active Member Full Member

    1,218
    1,925
    Mar 29, 2023
    Is anyone convinced Marciano beats a 1952 Walcott if there's a replay of the fight?
    If Walcott doesn't get tagged in the corner then he is clearly in control of the fight.

    Put him back in his prime and the advantage is greater.
    Now age Marciano a couple of years and the advantage is all the more skewed.
     
  12. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,166
    21,185
    Sep 22, 2021
    Maybe? There isn’t a “no” in terms of H2H it’s very debatable… Moore was a great fighter, one of the best and a much, much better boxer then Walcott that is not debatable.
     
  13. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,706
    36,358
    Jan 8, 2017
    The Marciano of the Moore figh was winding down.
    I always think if Moore had been a few years younger then Marciano might have ended up struggling to get a win.
    Anyway that Rocky verse that Walcott, I see Jersey in with a good chance of getting the win.
    He still had some good years ahead of him so he'd bring more to the fight.
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  14. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,753
    37,135
    Jul 4, 2014
    As much as you insist this is true, it is not known, and also completely irrelevant. The point it, it was a tough fight for reasons that did not have anything to do with Walcott's ability level at the time.