Buster Douglas was not a one fight wonder and the "Tokyo" label is borderline disrespectful

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by HistoryZero26, Jan 30, 2025.


  1. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,508
    32,232
    Jan 14, 2022
    I've said this for ages that Douglas was in red hot form 1986 to 1990.

    During that period he beat Berbick, McCall, Page, and had a stand out performance vs Mike Williams knocking his opponent down 3 times with a jab which was arguably as good as his performance vs Tyson.

    People label Douglas as some type of journeyman who peaked vs Tyson its utter rubbish he was a top 10 contender who was in good form for 4 years prior to the Tyson fight.
     
    Brian1980, Pat M, bboyrei and 2 others like this.
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,435
    9,421
    Jul 15, 2008
    he wasn’t a journeyman but a talented underachiever who for one fight gave and performed at 110% and scored an all time upset.
     
    Jackomano, swagdelfadeel and Jakub79 like this.
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,128
    10,539
    Jul 28, 2009
    Listen, this reminds me of an old boxing riddle they used to have about just what you're talking about. It went: Of brothers and sisters, this man has none, but this man's father is his father's only son. And the answer was "The Tokyo version of Douglas." I never understood it until today but it does rhyme and that is generally what we want out of our boxing riddles.
     
    kingfisher3 likes this.
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,561
    Apr 27, 2005
    The thread is a train wreck. Tucker beat one single contender in the 80's and a great many thought Buster quit, including his father. Tucker spent most of his career fighting nobodies. He's not even a top ten 80's fighter. Did Tucker even defeat a contender in the 90's? Without even digging i'm going to say no. That would mean Tucker beat one single top 10 contender in his life. He's remembered for beating Douglas and losing to Tyson. That's all he's got really. Oh, he went the distance with Lewis. The OP's infatuation with him is bizarre.

    I mean, "Douglas was an amazing and consistent heavyweight", excepting White and Holyfield. Uh, NO.

    "If Douglas never gets up from the Tyson KD and never wins the lineal belt he would still be up there with your Tuckers, Witherspoons and Thomas's as one of the best HWs of the late 80s." Uh no and what on earth is Tucker doing in that lot?

    "His record is great especially for the 80s and 90s standards." NO.

    "Bey was a great fighter it really doesn't matter." NO. Bey was on debut!!! Bey was 271 pounds!!!! He dropped 34 pounds for his next fight less than 3 months later. Bey was never great.

    Douglas has "a remarkable resume". NO. Well it has a remarkable win.

    To cut it short and seal the double deal, here's is KO's list of the top 12 heavyweights of the 80's. It was generated mid 89. Neither are even in the top 12. Well, Tucker couldn't possibly be! He beat one freaking contender. Douglas beat Tyson after the 80's and in reality not having him in the 12 is hardly unfair. Buster is a guy who did indeed have great promise but he simply never consistently wanted it bad enough. It is what it is.

    1. Larry Holmes
    2. Mike Tyson
    3. Michael Dokes
    4. Mike Weaver
    5. Pinklon Thomas
    6. Tim Witherspoon
    7. Greg Page
    8. Gerrie Coetzee
    9. Trevor Berbick
    10. Michael Spinks
    11. Tony Tubbs
    12. Carl Williams
     
    Glass City Cobra, zadfrak and Sangria like this.
  5. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,018
    2,212
    Nov 7, 2017
  6. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,453
    6,690
    Feb 27, 2024
    Imagine what would have happened if he wasn't sick and hadn't had outside drama at the time. He might have been even more impressive!
     
  7. People's Champ

    People's Champ Member banned Full Member

    109
    98
    Jan 27, 2025
    I certainly would hold him in higher regard than the likes of Andy Ruiz. People forget he even had his own Sega Genesis game
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  8. Unique Way

    Unique Way Active Member Full Member

    1,001
    1,898
    Sep 6, 2023
    Yes, I agree. He looked fantastic against Mike Williams and completely schooled very solid opponents in Oliver McCall and Trevor Berbick. Looked very good again Greg Page as well
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  9. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,246
    28,167
    Aug 22, 2021
    As well performed as Douglas might’ve been in other fights, they don’t hold a candle to his performance against Tyson.

    Therefore, “Tokyo Douglas” simply defines and identifies the rarefied and best version of Buster - not so much in terms of skills upheld - but in terms of oft missing, complementary true heart and absolute commitment to win.

    Would any other version of Douglas managed or even tried to scrape himself up off the floor after the vicious KD in round 8 of the Tyson fight?

    I tend to think not.

    In H2H fantasy, “Tokyo Douglas” is your man by a long way.

    Certainly one wouldn’t be proffering “Tucker Douglas” or “Holyfield Douglas”.

    All versions otherwise appear to fall well short of the winner by way of “ToKyO” Douglas.
     
    swagdelfadeel and JohnThomas1 like this.
  10. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,508
    32,232
    Jan 14, 2022
    I like @HistoryZero26 because he's always respectful but I just don't get his fascination with Tucker in all honestly no disrespect to him.

    Tucker never fought any of the notable 80s Heavyweight contenders, titlists, and his resume was heavily padded for the most part.

    I'll give Tucker credit for his durability and going the distance with Lewis, Tyson.

    But in reality Tucker's whole resume in the 80s is beating Buster Douglas and that's pretty much it in regards to notable wins unless you count James Broad who was more like a C class Heavyweight to me.

    I'd have Tucker below....Tyson, Holmes, Witherspoon, Thomas, Page, Tubbs, Weaver, Bonecrusher, Dokes, Berbick.

    So for me Tucker wouldn't even be in my top 10 for the 80s Heavyweights based on what they actually did in the decade.
     
    JohnThomas1 and HistoryZero26 like this.
  11. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,508
    32,232
    Jan 14, 2022
    I think Douglas's performance against Mike Williams was also superb knocking down an opponent 3 times with a jab is unheard of.

    Obviously Williams is no Tyson but the performance in regards to the eye test was pretty damn good.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  12. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,748
    4,170
    Jan 6, 2024
    I'm not infatuated. You've underrated Douglas so bad a solid defense of his actual capabilities makes it look like that. How in gods name does Douglas not make that top 12 when hes undefeated(3-0) against the top 12? Played themselves by leaving Tucker out. That list is a contradiction of itself. Holmes is number 1 and is 4-3 against the list members and Tyson is number 2 whose 6-0. Just incredible well thought out list.

    Douglas is clearly one of the 10 best HWs of the era and should generally be rated 5th through 7th.


    "Tucker beat one single contender in the 80's and a great many thought Buster quit, including his father." Carefully worded there and still wrong. This is why I think we should sort fighters by age or debut date or something.

    "Tucker even defeat a contender in the 90's?" He beat McCall who like Douglas was a champ and older Jimmy Young. He also beat Broad in the USBA title fight that could be viewed as the start of his IBF lineage. Broad was in the top 10 at the end of 1984. Anyway we're talking about Buster who beat 5 contenders not counting Tangstad. We're not here to relitigate Tuckers very divisive resume.

    Douglas going into the Tyson fight was 28-4 with 2 of his losses being stoppages of fights he'd have otherwise won and a third being a close loss to Ferguson. He was 9-1 his past 10 fights 14-2 since the White fight. He'd only lost to Tucker his whole late 20s. How is that not consistant? It might seen silly to use being green as an excuse when Tyson was champ at 20 but generally that is a solid reason given for losses. Theres no evidence of Douglas of being this inconsistant fighter who could never get it together its a mythology. Especially for an era defined by such inconsistancy. All these inconsistant guys and the only one that actually beats Tyson gets their name turned into a verb for inconsistancy.

    Buster beat 5 contenders not counting Tangstad who he only drew cause of deductions. Thats more than Pinklon and Tucker less than Witherspoon. That does compare well for the 80s. Very well.

    Bey wasn't one of the top 10 HWs of the era but he beat Page and was USBA champ. He was a top HW. A very high caliber opponent for ones 6th fight even if he was a debutant. Patterson and Tyson Fury were both knocked down by debutants and while they won they were champs.



    Holmes and Tyson are obviously on another level resume wise. But lets compare the rest to Douglas. Heres your lists and some others records against HW contenders over their whole careers. Theres records are devoid of a lot of context but Douglas does compare well regardless. When you look at the context hes even better. He did this while throwing away his whole early 30s.

    26-5 Holmes
    20-5 Tyson
    9-9 Page
    8-5 Bruno
    8-8 Witherspoon
    7-4-2 Dokes
    6-3 Tubbs
    6-5 Oliver McCall
    6-9-1 Weaver
    6-12 James Smith
    5-5 Carl Williams
    5-5-1 Buster Douglas
    5-5-1 Coetzee
    5-6 Berbick
    4-1 Michael Spinks
    4-2 Marvis Frazier
    4-4 Biggs
    4-6 Tucker
    3-1-1 Tangstad
    3-3 Cooney
    3-4-1 Pinklon Thomas
    2-4-1 Leon Spinks
    2-5 Cobb
    2-5-1 Snipes
    2-8 Bey
    2-12 Tillis
    2-13 Jesse Ferguson
    1-5 Broad
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2025
  13. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,748
    4,170
    Jan 6, 2024
    I knew our alliance couldn't last lol. Can't help but question each others rating of Tucker and Weaver.

    Reasons for my rating Tucker high are his consistant performances against the 3 lineal champs he fought, valuing the USBA/NABF double and his consistancy IE not being stopped until 95 etc. Also theres the whole Michael Spinks getting the shot over Tucker with no fights at HW thing. People rate Spinks in their top 5 for 4-1 well Tucker was 40-1. Boths 1s are to the same guy and are very different.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,561
    Apr 27, 2005
    Yeah he is a good fellow.

    Tucker's resume is ordinary. There's no honest way around it. He should be in no-ones top 10 list of 80's heavyweights. He simply doesn't belong! The guy turned pro there in 1980 and didn't fight a contender until 1987!!!!!! How in gods name does that work? After that one contender in mid 87 he fought Tyson 3 months later then an absolute nobody in December 1989. He'd be lucky to be top 20. He didn't make Ring's top 12. You can add multiple fighters above him on your list.

    Gerrie Coetzee KO'd Dokes, whooped the crap out of Snipes in a robbery and had good fights with the likes of Weaver and Page. Heck, add a draw with Thomas and a win over Tillis. He's miiiiiiiiiiles ahead of Tucker. Tucker is barely a blip on the 80's radar. One suspects the build up of Douglas is aimed at raising the status of Tucker quite frankly.

    Broad axe had been pole axed in 2 rounds by Witherspoon and beaten by Marvis Frazier before he even fought Tucker. Francesco Damiani all but shut him out immediately after Tucker beat him. He's a C level win indeed.
     
  15. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,748
    4,170
    Jan 6, 2024
    Circumstance. Eddie Lopez for example stopped fighting after Tucker. Tucker used the same pipelines all American fighters of that era used. He won his states title and he won both the NABF and USBA. The fact that he got these distinctions easier than some others isn't really his fault. When he got his first 3 title shots he encountered Douglas, Tyson and Lewis and gave a good account of himself. It all evened itself out.

    Rating an opponent high because they beat someone who beat someone else is how things typically go. Theres nothing nefarious or underhanded about that. I'm not the one who created these narratives about Douglas being a one fight wonder.

    Tucker despite being underrated by Ring made the Ring top 10 5 times in a stacked era and top 5 twice. He wasn't on Rings 1989 list. Ring instead put in Gary Mason. Are you going to tell me with a straight face that wasn't an arbitrary decision and Mason deserved that spot more? In 90 he was left off in favor of Damiani. In 1993 despite doing well against Lennox he was left off in favor of Bentt and Hunter. Do you agree with those decision? At the end of 1994 despite being the IBFs top contender he was left off the Rings top 10 in favor of Gonzalez and Lionel Butler.