Why can fighters fight at older ages today but not in the past?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Feb 23, 2025.

  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    3,735
    Loads and loads of boxers with 100+ fights since Duran. There have even been fighters who reached the 300-fight mark, since Duran retired! But if they weren't globally televised, I guess they don't count.
     
    OddR likes this.
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    41,857
    Likes Received:
    11,164
    I read his comment, and automatically thought that he was talking about a top level fighter.

    I doubt we’ll ever see a world level fighter have a 100 fight career again.

    Yes, there’ll be loads of journeyman. But they take fights at less than a week’s notice many times, and they’re normally 4-6 rounders, fought at a low level.
     
    OddR likes this.
  3. fencik45

    fencik45 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2022
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    3,034
  4. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Messages:
    11,466
    Likes Received:
    10,699
    That's how you interpreted my post?
     
  5. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2017
    Messages:
    3,936
    Likes Received:
    6,359
    Let's get real. It's just PEDs.

    What does 'sports science' even mean. It's some ambiguous magic apparently.
    What we're talking about is the ageing process, which is biological.
    Nutrition has zero impact as everyone now has abundance of fortified food, vitamins etc., some fad diet isn't going to make you young.
    Special training methods/routines don't change the ageing process.
    The only thing that has really changed outside of PEDs is 'sports surgery', and that is actually a pretty big factor but even now if injuries are serious the athlete likely won't be the same again, so will decline.

    The reality is that the fighters who are fighting for a long time and don't seem to be declining much, these guys are likely on serious PEDs. When Beterbiev is also getting abnormal tests for youth drugs like HGH and testosterone and also happens to show little decline post 35, it's obvious what is happening. Pacman also likely a PED cheat and his performance against Thurman was highly suspect for a 'natural' athlete around forty. Mayweather a PED cheat, also fought for a long time.

    As for Golovkin, we can't be sure anyone is clean, but he actually shows a far more natural decline where he became slower and less effective and was relying on skills/experience/power to be competitive. The difference could be seen in his Canelo trilogy alone.
     
    MarkusFlorez99 likes this.
  6. CroBox29

    CroBox29 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2019
    Messages:
    6,106
    Likes Received:
    7,147
    Before, fighters fought more often, had far more fights per year due to less earnings, and more damage was inflicted on them...
     
  7. MrPook

    MrPook Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,343
    Likes Received:
    3,369
    1. They don’t fight as often

    2. Better healthcare/recovery/food
    3. Better PEDs

    I think 1. Is by far the most important.
     
    Jakub79 and OddR like this.
  8. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,895
    Likes Received:
    2,227
    Performance Enhancing Drugs.
    It's 100% just better drugs.

    A full natty brah would be shot by mid 30s...no, a full natty brah would not even ever compete at a world class level. If an athlete is 100% lifetime natural, then his ceiling is local high school level. Once you get to the university level there's too many drug users for a natural to have a real chance.
     
  9. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    83,924
    Likes Received:
    139,351
    There might not have been PEDs as we know them now back then but there also wasn't any drug testing so god knows what kind of performance enhancing, energy boosting, pain suppressing etc. drugs and substances they were taking which were around back then, especially in the US.

    And let's not forget whilst they might have had hundreds of fights the majority or vast majority of them were against vagrants, winos, and peg-leg cripples they literally pulled off the street or if they were actually registered pros they had records like we see North of 140 in the women's divisions today, as in 1-0-0,1-2-1, 2-9, 7-16-3. They weren't even club level amateurs who actually knew how to fight.
     
    OddR and Bukkake like this.
  10. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    3,735
    So very true!

    Looking over the records of some of the top old-timers, can sometimes be horrifying reading!

    For example, Sam Langford, at the time a veteran of over 250 fights, scored 4 quick ko wins in 1922-23 against one Rosco Hall, who was engaging in his 2nd, 4th, 5th and 10th registered pro bout! Needless to say, something like that would never be allowed today. And you can find these grotesque mismatches all over the place, back in the "good old days".
     
    Serge likes this.
  11. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    83,924
    Likes Received:
    139,351
    Yeah, the rose-tinted goggle wearing boxing nostalgists and paleontologists will try and have you believe the greats from back then fought 200-300 killers but these 300 fight amateur greats of more recent times fought 280 bums.

    Like I said, even regional level amateurs know how to fight, whereas, many of the dregs they dragged off the street back in the good old days wouldn't even know how to throw a punch, defend against one, or possess the stamina to make it to the end of the 1st round.
     
    OddR likes this.
  12. MuffinTop

    MuffinTop New Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2025
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    10
    The last time I checked Foreman, Holmes , Archie Moore , Hopkins, etc all fought until the were almost 50
     
  13. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2021
    Messages:
    7,164
    Likes Received:
    10,807
    Eh. BHop. Foreman. Holmes. Holyfield. Duran. Moore. Hell, Bugner iirc. There have always been a few guys blessed by a combo of genetics and luck in avoiding injury to be able to fight well into their 40s.

    Beterbiev has taken superb care of himself and his best trait is his power. His issue is injuries. If he could avoid more injuries, he could be an elite for a few more years (even if probably unable to get past Bivol), and still a top level fighter for a few more after that. Now, he can’t avoid injuries, that’s always been his issue, so I’d bet he does the trilogy fight and that’s it for him.
     
  14. MuffinTop

    MuffinTop New Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2025
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    10
    Beterbiev rarely gets in the ring
     
  15. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    3,735
    Yes, so many rose-tinted opinions... but then again, on a Classic forum that's to be expected.

    There will always be people in a place like this, who are adamant, that the real old-timers (like from 100 years ago, back in the 1920s) were these gallant warriors, who were battling it out 10-12 (or more!) times a year. And often in long, hard fights - where they only survived thanks to extraordinary heart and bravery, that modern (sissy) fighters can only dream about. Jesus!
     
    OddR and Badbot like this.