2 judges scored round 9 for Davis, the round where he got knocked down

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MetalLicker, Mar 2, 2025.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ive tried my best to help you in this situation.

    You asked why there was outrage, i explained why.

    You incorrectly remembered a time something similar had happened before, i examined why it wasn't the case.

    Despite all that, you still disagree with the ref and still believe Roach would have won with the correct call.

    So you aren't aren't disagreeing with me any more, you're arguing with your own points and then projecting back onto me.
     
    kriszhao and Young Terror like this.
  2. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    No, I’m not disagreeing with myself, you’re just confused because your not able to comprehend that I may think it was slightly incorrect but understand and accept what happened in real time.

    I didn’t incorrectly do such a thing, I drew a comparison where you refuse to see any similarities. Obviously we can do that with every scenario as no 2 scenarios are exactly the same.

    I don’t need your help, I think you need help, but I’m not going to provide that.

    this is not arguing about points about boxing, this is just a case of me asking you to leave me alone, saying goodbye etc wishing you luck but you still persisting with an argument about nothing.

    are you accepting the refs call or are you still saying it’s an injustice?
    This is the issue with forums, someone just derails and takes thing personal.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    I try to explain everything as cordially as can to deal with your misconceptions, but there's only so much I can do.

    No, it was the wrong call. He should have counted.
     
    kriszhao and Young Terror like this.
  4. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    It’s ok, don’t worry. I need no explanation from you.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    I didn't mind mate. Always here to help.
     
    Young Terror likes this.
  6. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Didn’t help me one bit as I needed no help.

    if it helped you, good on ya.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    As you said. It was the wrong call.

    Atleast now we've settled on that.

    Enjoy your day good sir.
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  8. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    That didn’t take settling, something to that effect was In my posts from the start.
    I thought it should have been a kd but understood a miscommunication with ref and tank caused this.

    This why you needed help understanding, you can try explain it to yourself from now since you like explaining things.

    good luck
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's fine mate, we're only human.

    We've settled on it now, it should have been a kd, meaning Roach should have won.

    Have a great day mate.
     
    Young Terror likes this.
  10. Young Terror

    Young Terror ★ Griselda ★ Full Member

    7,412
    7,155
    May 9, 2012
    @lufcrazy

    This content is protected


    He shoots.. He scores...
     
    lufcrazy likes this.
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    That and Liverpool are up there with my favourites.

    I also Beckford knocking the scum out of the FA Cup
     
    Young Terror likes this.
  12. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    If we changed the facts then yes, roach wins.
    but we can also change them so tank wins.

    sticking to the facts, tank kept his belt.

    having a lovely day hope you are too.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well boxing is a subjective sport, so facts are changed all the time. Im sure there are results you disagree with, even though the facts will disagree with you.

    But the main thing is you've now agreed that it should have been a knockdown so Roach would have won on your cards.

    Have a good day sir.
     
    lobk and kriszhao like this.
  14. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Parts can be subjective, but the records are not. The title holders are not (tank being one).

    I said from the start I think it should’ve been scored a knockdown. nothing in my view changed.
    If we applied that one change in the round in a vacuum to the rest of the fight, roach would win on my cards.

    however, if we applied that change we would also have to take into account the changes the fighters would make in response to that change during the rest of the fight, where again tank would probably come away with the belt.

    When changing reality, we sometimes need to think about the chain reaction that is caused by said change.

    if we stick to reality, tank comes away with the belt. Do you agree with this?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,153
    20,801
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah so like you said, Roach should have won. I agree with you.

    Cheers mate.
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.