2 judges scored round 9 for Davis, the round where he got knocked down

Im ignoring all the nonsense.

We agree it should have been a knockdown.

 

Ok you do that

 

No worries. Im happy we agree.

 

It’s good to be happy

 

It's.

As per thread discussion, we agree it should have been a knockdown.

I'll let you have the last word now, i think you need it.

 

There is no “we” about it, I have my opinion which I stated early on and nothing has changed.

You wanted me to say that roach should have won, but since I made you you realise there are more assumptions that go with that which make it a far reach, you backed off that and changed your stance to simply the one round KD situation, which i never disagreed with fully.

Tank kept his belt for now as the official referee supersedes anyone else’s opinion.

glad to hear you finally concede

 

I know

But the blows not being landed by you this time lol

 

You already agreed Roach would have won on your card had the right call been made.

 

What blow?

 

I'm not getting involved any further lol

 

So you’re a liar and not stopping now?

as I’ve explained several times, IF (can I make this IF bigger) it was as simple as changing that ONE round is the ONLY way, but as you have accepted already, “OF COURSE” that is unreasonable.
The only option is change the round and it becomes a NC and guess what, tank keeps his belt.
The only opinion this drama you made has changed is that you now accept how you can’t just change rd 9 and keep the rest the same.

Either way, Tank keeps his belt, end of story!

 

I was happy to give you the last word, but i wanted to point out you've already agreed with me that Roach would have won on your card.

 

But you conveniently missed out my qualifiers for that to happen….which is why you are either lacking comprehension or just agenda driven like mad and selecting parts of my comments to remove context.

So;
1) you call me a troll and hater, then try condemning me for insulting you.

2) you select parts of my comments to intentionally take them out of context to further your narrative

3) you accept that if rd9 had the result we both stated from the start that it should have, this doesn’t automatically mean the remaining rounds would be the same, therefore the controversy you suggest surrounding the result is heavily reduced.

4) your initial argument was that it should have been a roach win, but when you realised this didn’t make sense you have backtracked your argument to just zone in on the KD.

5) you lie and have backtracked on your word.

Well done!
You’ve achieved a lot

 

See this is the white noise i ignore.

We agree it should have been a knockdown. We agree Roach should have won on your card.

Have a great day.

I'm glad we've resolved this cordially.

 

Hahaha. Ignore your a liar any only quote part of my posts to intentionally take things out of context to try suit your narrative!!

Liar and deceitful.

keep ignoring the truth.