James Toney vs 70s George Foreman (15 rounds) - challenger withstanding

Foreman will win, but he should work hard with Tony

 

Has anyone mentioned the ref yet? Foreman would be in deep waters if he weren't allowed to do the two handed shove, wing kidney punches, and measure with his left.

 

George Foreman knocks James Toney out in 3-4 rounds

I've never understood the hype James Toney gets by some on these forums as a heavyweight

He struggled in arguably the worst heavyweight era ever

He didnt move well at all and that shoulder roll isn't helping vs George Foremans ferocious body attack

 

Toney shows up out of shape and after the fight blames his his loss on his struggles in camp. Also complains that Foreman spent all fight running instead of fighting. Afterwards he gives a special shoutout to all of the underprivileged children in the world and to the Burger King on West Johnson Ave. in Detroit for staying open 24/7.

 

It’s says it all that you avoided using an in form Toney. Maybe Foreman would claim he didn’t have enough leg room on the flight over and that Jesus spoke to him in the showers.

 

Don't be ridiculous. If Foreman lost he would claim that he was poisoned.

 

If Foreman lost the fight would be changed to a No Contest shortly afterwards once Toneys drug test came back.

 

Better conditioned stronger Heavyweights ? Based on what exactly ?

John Ruiz, Samuel Peter, Hasim Rahman, is not exactly a murderers row.

And Toney lost a very one sided decision to Peter in their rematch who was far more crude than Foreman and a considerably lesser fighter overall.

 

Fight would have never happened. they were both good friends

 

Toney didn't school Peter the first time it was a close fight that Toney may of appeared to edge but it certainly wasn't a schooling and he lost a very one sided rematch.

For all of Rahman's supposed stamina like you're claiming glass chinned Maskaev stopped him twice in the 2nd half of the fight.

 

What do you mean by this?