Jeffries vs Wills

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vutcatus, Apr 26, 2025.


Jeffries vs Wills

  1. Jeffries Ko/Tko

    4 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. Jeffries decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Wills Ko/Tko

    3 vote(s)
    37.5%
  4. Wills decision

    1 vote(s)
    12.5%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Vutcatus

    Vutcatus New Member Full Member

    47
    85
    Sep 6, 2024
    The best Jeffries against the best Wills.
    25 rounds, rules and gloves of their time.

    Jeffries was highly regarded by his contemporaries, for his athleticism and character.
    A short career, but full with many victories against highly rated opponents, zero defeats before his unfortunate return, aged and out of shape.
    Wills was a 'king without a crown', never having been able to fight for the title of world champion, even when he was the opponent no. 1.
    A long career, many prestigious victories, some draws and defeats even against non-top opponents.

    Who wins and why?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,690
    47,424
    Mar 21, 2007
    This would be a wonderful fight. Harry Wills has an absolute masterclass in handling pressure and aggression and Jeffries basically knows one way. Wills obviously doesn't have the advanced control of such fighters as that employed by Johnson but he'd do very, very well early exacting the toll and keeping out of trouble, he's proven it. Twenty-five rounds is a long time in there with the animal Jeffries though and he knew how to exact a toll of his own, even early I say. Oooft 25 rounds probably perfectly pitched...I think - I think i'll pick Wills to understand the urgency early and do enough damage to be able to suffer his way home to a decision scored as we understand it - but in reality this would be chased out a draw.

    Who knows how a trilogy might pan out? A finish fight is the stuff of nightmares though, tell you that.
     
    Greg Price99, dmt and Vutcatus like this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,822
    44,846
    Feb 11, 2005
    Good lord, if old, part-timer Corbett was able to turn Jeffries' face to hamburger employing the some rudimentary boxing, Wills would be serving tartar after 4 rounds, if Jeffries made it that long.
     
    Mike Cannon likes this.
  4. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,177
    3,640
    Jan 6, 2024
    I don't think Jeffries can touch anyone mildly resembling an elite HW from Wills era.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,690
    47,424
    Mar 21, 2007
    Wills himself struggled desperately with Sam Langford, who had already boxed a career by the time Jeffries retired and was directly discussed as a potential opponent for Jeffries while they were sorting his post-retirement mess out.
     
  6. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,217
    1,592
    Sep 13, 2006
    Until small 5’7” Langford was really old, he twice walked down Wills and knocked him out late. Jeffries was even bigger naturally than Langford (who said he would fight anyone but Jeff, for he would have no chance), and could and did at times employ the same style, walk him down, and get him out late. People forget that Jeff could box too when he wanted as well. Competitive fight, and Jeff might possibly even be behind on points, but he’d get him.
     
    cross_trainer and Vutcatus like this.
  7. RockyValdez

    RockyValdez Active Member Full Member

    579
    302
    Jun 9, 2013
    Wills was too advanced for Jeffries.
     
  8. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society New Member Full Member

    43
    35
    Feb 14, 2023
    Jeffries is a king with 25 rounds. He would have a chance.
    But prime Wills is asking alot.

    I think he could maybe avoid being knockout out maybe. I wouldn't bet on him winning.
    But in 10 bouts with Wills he could win a couple.
     
  9. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,177
    3,640
    Jan 6, 2024
    The fat slow version of Langford was able to walk down Bill Tate, Andre Anderson and George Godfrey. The size of someone like Jeffries meant nothing to Langford. Jeffries couldn't stop Tom Sharkey in 45 rounds of action and these were competitive fights.

    Langford was a kid fighting at MW when he said that and Jeffries was the undefeated GOAT of the sport. Langford being scared of the man means nothing in this context. Foreman was scared of Frazier too look how that turned out.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  10. Vutcatus

    Vutcatus New Member Full Member

    47
    85
    Sep 6, 2024
    1) Sharkey was a very good boxer, appreciated by others of his time, including Johnson who called him among the best he had seen;
    2) the second fight with Sharkey was fought by Jeffries with his left arm, his best, injured in training. It is extraordinary that he won, in these conditions.
    3) Sharkey showed in the second fight exceptional qualities of resistance, with two or three cracked ribs protruding from his rib cage, a swollen ear and other injuries ...
     
  11. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,177
    3,640
    Jan 6, 2024
    Of his time. Hes older than the sport of gloved boxing is. I'm not discounting his place in the first era. Tom Sharkey might have been the best pure boxer of the 19th century, certainly top 2 or 3. But he was a small guy that was nowhere near as dangerous as Langford.

    In the first decade of the 20th century Lang was probably the best combination of size and power HW had. Langford obliterated him when weighing 165 pounds. That Bill Lang probably beats Jeffries.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2025
    cross_trainer likes this.
  12. Vutcatus

    Vutcatus New Member Full Member

    47
    85
    Sep 6, 2024
    1) Tom Sharkey and Sam Langford fought almost in the same era, for some years they were both active at the same time.
    2) Small Tom Sharkey? For a heavyweight, yes. But Sharkey was 174 cm, Langford 171. Langford's weight varied from 135 to 185 lbs, while Sharkey fluctuated between 172 and 205. Sharkey was taller and bigger than Langford.
    3) Lang's career is: 27 W; 1 D; 14 L. With 14 losses in 42 fights, some of which against unknowns: Fraser; Williamps, Curran, McMahon and others. He was a good boxer, but absolutely not on the level of Jeffries or even Sharkey or Fitzsimmons or McVey or other leading fighters of his time.
     
    cross_trainer and Greg Price99 like this.
  13. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,177
    3,640
    Jan 6, 2024
    Its Sam Langford possibly the GOAT of boxing and Wills did win the H2H. It was the 200 pound fat version of Langford too.


    Langford was a teenager fighting at MW when Jeffries retired. In 1910 he was an alternative opponent to Johnson because Langford was a HW title claimant. But any chance Jeffries had against a Jack Johnson he didn't have against Langford because Langford would get him out of there quick even as a MW.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,690
    47,424
    Mar 21, 2007
    Right, but you’ve said that “nobody” from Jeffries time would even been competitive with Wills and what I’m saying is, there’s a meaningful overlap between Sam’s career and Jim’s which makes this statement untrue.

    This thing about him being 200lbs and fat - that’s not true. He did fight overweight later on, but he also fought Wills at a rock solid 185. But so what if he was fat? All it would prove was that a Jeffries peer was competitive with the best heavy of the following era while fat.

    Right. Which is exactly what I said. What’s amazing is that even in 1909, people didn’t like Sam’s chances against Jeffries - including even Sam himself apparently.

    The idea that the difference between 1905 and 1915 is so massive that completion couldn’t exist between fighters from the two eras is demonstrably untrue.
     
  15. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,177
    3,640
    Jan 6, 2024
    1)They weren't good in almost the same era. Langford was 13 years younger than Tom Sharkey. And era to era that is the single biggest jump boxing ever had. Its not just any 10 year jump its that particular one.

    2)Sharkey was taller but Langford was Langford. And Langford weighed around 200 pounds for a decent chunk of his career so he did not top out at 185 pounds. Sharkey might have had a 90% KO rate as did Armstrong on the other side of the height spectrum but again look at his era. He let Jeffries survive for 45 rounds. Langford would never let that happen. Neither would the better versions of Schreck or Burns.

    3)Lang was a top 5 HW in the 1907-1912 period. But the thing that stands out with him is that era was very small and he was the biggest most dangerous guy. Him Johnson and Kaufman were really the only top HWs north of 6 ft in this era and Langs the only one whose power was noteworthy. Thats why Langfords dominant win over him is such a highlight.

    Lang did not have good luck. The Curran loss was a DQ loss in a fight he otherwise would have won and that Lang avenged twice. Curran was not an unknown either he was one of the best fighters in the UK. Lang also blew a lead in a 20 rounder to Lester another loss which he avenged. . Finally he lost a 6 round decision to Kaufman by 1 round. Langs 14 losses also include Tommy Burns twice, Langford, Jack Johnson, McVea,Dave Smith and Jim Barry and he lost to a prime version of that whole group. Jim Barry IMO is the greatest HW ever with a sub .500 record and Dave Smith was an ATG caliber fighter. Tom McMahon beat Lang in his final fight and he wasn't an unknown either with wins including Willard, Morris, Jack Dillon and Kaufman. Every fighter I just named except Curran would beat Jeffries fairly easily IMO.

    Lang had an insane SOS its just not appreciated because people don't know as much about the Australian fighters and Lang mostly stayed in Australia and mostly relied on top non Australian fighters coming to fight him. In 1914 when Lang got his final win over "white heavyweight champion" Arthur Pelkey, Pelkey was the 2nd worst opponent Lang had fought since 1907. It was several months after Pelkey had lost said title to Gunboat in 1914.


    Among Langs wins Squires, Mike Williams and Cripps were great opponents and Jim Griffin was a pretty good one. Felix was old but he was the best black Australian HW after Peter Jackson. Lang also stopped a very old Bob Fitzsimmons.