Michael Nunn vs Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez at 160lbs and 168lbs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Devon, Dec 20, 2020.

  1. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    11,655
    Likes Received:
    4,380
    Canelo would not even fight him. Too much of a risk. He already lost twice to GGG, he would lose more badly to Nunn
     
    surfinghb and Smoochie like this.
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    26,235
    Likes Received:
    17,194
    Your feelings.
     
  3. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,108
    Likes Received:
    5,698
    Nunn at both weights, but at 160 easier.. he got more flatfooted and used his angles less at 168 out of laziness probably.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  4. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2021
    Messages:
    14,183
    Likes Received:
    16,245
  5. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Messages:
    13,096
    Likes Received:
    12,545
    Canelo would have a shot at Super middle.
    But middleweight Nunn would box his ears off and stop him late.
    Nunn was what 6'2 southpaw who was lightning fast.
     
  6. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    21,934
    Likes Received:
    6,105
    Nunn, easily.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,614
    Likes Received:
    43,953
    Nunn gets a little overrated for mine at times and people forget how many disappointing spotty performances he had. When he was good he was good tho. I think i'd favor him over Canelo at 160 and i'd probably favor Canelo at 168 strange as it might seem.
     
  8. jont

    jont Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,115
    Likes Received:
    338
    I agree...Nunn was never the same after losing to Toney... the higher weights were where the majority of Nunn's laziness was observed
     
    Smoochie, Loudon and JohnThomas1 like this.
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,614
    Likes Received:
    43,953
    Absolutely.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    40,832
    Likes Received:
    10,205
    Nunn would have been a significant favourite at MW.

    Canelo wasn’t prime then, and it would have been a very bad stylistic match up him.

    At 168, Canelo is now in his absolute prime. He looks more confident and composed, with better stamina. And although it would still have been a tough match up stylistically, Nunn had slipped at SMW, where he wasn’t as consistent, losing to guys like Steve Little. I have to believe that he’d have respected Canelo enough to get into the best shape possible, but he wasn’t the fighter he’d been in his prime at MW. I could definitely envisage Canelo beating him at 168.

    So: Nunn at 160, Canelo at 168.
     
    Smoochie, Thread Stealer and Devon like this.
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    26,235
    Likes Received:
    17,194
    Canelo’s 160 resume is better than Nunn’s. Nunn fought a great aggressive counterpuncher in Toney and ended up getting stopped.
     
    Devon likes this.
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    40,832
    Likes Received:
    10,205
    It’s not really about the resumes for me.

    Nunn was much sharper and more focused at 160.

    I don’t think Canelo would be able to get as close as what Toney did.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2021
    Smoochie likes this.
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    26,235
    Likes Received:
    17,194
    Canelo is a lot like Toney, but he cuts the ring off better. It would be a tightrope walk for Nunn, even at 160.
     
  14. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    18,159
    Likes Received:
    28,331
    Nunn easily at 160.
    Canelo most likely beats Nunn clearly at 168.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  15. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,126
    Likes Received:
    44,867
    I agree Canelo is a clear fav at 168, but I don't think Nunn does win so easily at 160. Making him favourite is fine, but I think Canelo would likely work on firing straights to the body, and looking to land a left hook below Nunn's jab. Something interesting I've noticed in MMA, is that often guys will choose not to cut the ring early in the fight, and let their opponent ware themselves out.

    I think Canelo would likely do something similar with Nunn, and it'd be very cagey and close decision imo.
     
    Smoochie, JohnThomas1 and Flo_Raiden like this.