Joseph Parker gets sent to the 1960s, does he clear the lot ? (Boxing Evolution Theory)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, May 11, 2025.


Would Joseph Parker overwhelm the 1960s ?

This poll will close on Feb 6, 2028 at 7:15 PM.
  1. Parker destroys those outdated heavyweights

    12.7%
  2. He beats everyone but Ali

    7.9%
  3. No

    79.4%
  1. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,176
    36,225
    Jul 4, 2014
    Neither hear nor there. Again, he was fighting much smaller, less physical fighters.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,033
    45,277
    Feb 11, 2005
    And Parker was fighting candy-asses with Insta pages. Neither here nor there.
     
  3. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,176
    36,225
    Jul 4, 2014
    Sure, man. You keep arguing when I have told you I don't really have a dog in the fight. If you want to believe that Liston could have beat these guys today, go right ahead.
     
  4. Joe.Boxer

    Joe.Boxer Chinchecker Full Member

    7,586
    1,084
    Jan 8, 2011
    Parker shouldn't be anywhere near 270lbs. His conditioning has always been garbage.
     
  5. The Cryptkeeper

    The Cryptkeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    5,455
    May 9, 2023
    You keep contradicting yourself. Therefore it’s difficult for those of us trying to “debate” with you to hit a moving target.

    It has been pointed out to you that the smallest of today’s heavyweights rules the division. You conveniently dismiss this because it doesn’t suit your flimsy argument. The only concession that you make is that Usyk is special.

    Well chum, as much as you don’t like it, Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Holmes and Liston were also special. And every single one of them would beat Parker like a red-headed stepchild.
     
  6. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,521
    8,669
    Apr 25, 2008
    Parker is on a good run, but he has become a low output fighter (approx. 250 punches thrown against Wilder and 350 against Zhang). Can he even fight at a decent pace these days with his age and added muscle?

    Those punch stats just aren't good enough for the 60s-70s guys who threw punches all night long for 15 rounds.
     
  7. LenHarvey

    LenHarvey Active Member Full Member

    697
    1,143
    Oct 8, 2024
  8. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,471
    3,231
    Oct 19, 2006
    In New Zealand we have had one of the best Rugby teams in the world for over 100 years.

    In the 1970s were some of the greatest legends the sport has ever seen

    And yet there is no-one who would even begin to argue that the 70s team would beat today's team.

    It is all about SIZE and MOBILITY and ATHLETICISM. Today's boys are bigger, stronger, faster, better trained.

    Every single sport has this pattern. And boxing is no different.

    Today's players simply WIPE THE FLOOR with those old guys. And it is OBVIOUS.
     
    Kiwi Casual likes this.
  9. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,471
    3,231
    Oct 19, 2006
    Let me repeat - It Is OBVIOUS.
     
  10. OddR

    OddR Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,725
    1,799
    Jan 8, 2025
    He used to come in a lot lighter.

    He seems to be carrying the extra weight well but he should definitely be lighter for Uysk.
     
  11. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,471
    3,231
    Oct 19, 2006
    Can anyone explain to me

    Why SIZE and Athleticism have mattered so much in Rugby over the last 50 years (a heavy contact sport)

    And yet somehow Boxing is immune??

    We know that today's Rugby players wipe the floor with even the legendary teams of 50 years ago.

    Why can't we admit this is the case with Boxing too?
     
    MarkusFlorez99 likes this.
  12. The Cryptkeeper

    The Cryptkeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    5,455
    May 9, 2023
    You are conflating two different things which is a simpleton’s way of arguing.

    How did George Foreman come back and win the undisputed, lineal HW title 20 years after winning it the first time? Phil Mickelson won a major golf title weeks before he turned 51 if you really want to go down your silly path of comparing sports.

    But really, all you need to do is draw a formline through the Holyfield/old Foreman era to completely disprove your argument. Hell, George Foreman shatters your argument straight up, in worse fashion than he shattered Michael Moorer’s chin.
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2025
  13. The Cryptkeeper

    The Cryptkeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    5,455
    May 9, 2023
    Bob Beamon held the world long jump record for 23 years. He has held the Olympic long jump record for 57 years.

    So, no it is not OBVIOUS at all.
     
    Wizbit1013 and Loudon like this.
  14. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,471
    3,231
    Oct 19, 2006
    Michael Moorer was only 6'2" tall. He was literally a blown-up LHW.

    Very lucky that Big George was able to face someone an inch shorter than him to gain the title.

    If that fight is your "proof" then you are in real trouble.
     
  15. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,471
    3,231
    Oct 19, 2006
    If only we could see today's SHWs standing next to all these guys, we would suddenly see the truth-

    "Liston's best opponents were pretty undersized compared to Joe and the guys he fought:

    Patterson- 6'0", 189, World Champion
    Patterson- 6'0", 194, #1 NBA contender
    Foley- 6'1",198.5, #3 NBA contender, #1 Ring Magazine
    Williams- 6'2", 215.5 Unranked
    Willlams- 6'2", 210, # NBA 10 contender
    Machon- 6'0", 196, #2 NBA Contender, #3 Ranked Ring Magazine
    Valdez- 6'3", 211, #2 Ring Magazine
    Summerline 6'1", 201, Unranked
    Summerline 6'1", 206, Unranked
    Marshall, 6'0.5", 18, Unranked
    Marshall, 6'0.5", 179, "Honorable Mention" at LHW
    Wepner, 6'5", 228, Unranked
    Clark, 6'3", 215, #5 NBA contender
    Rischer, not listed, 200, Unranked
    Bethea, 6'0", 204, #8 Ring magazine
    Westphal, 5'7.5", 195, Unranked
    Besmanoff, 5'11", 201, Unranked
    Harris, 6'0", 195, #6 NBA, #7 Ring Magazine
    Dejohn, 6'2.5", 202, #9 ranked NBA, #8 Ranked Ring Magazine"