I don't get it. He did not get ko'd until he was past his prime. Not all 35 year old's are past it since different fighters age differently. But Jones had been competing at the top level for a decade and age was bound to set in at some point. Tarver was a big hitting southpaw and the fact that he was a left hander just made him more dangerous. Other than Stevenson, its hard to think of a bigger hitting leftie at 175 lbs. Jones did take some big shots of Tarver in the first fight and if he was as glass jawed as people claim, he would have been ko'd in the first fight. I just saw someone in general pick Bivol to stop Jones. Jesus Christ. I know its just one poster but i don't get it. Jones did not have a great chin like Ali, Canelo, Usyk and certainly not an elite one like McCall or Hagler. But he was far from glass jawed.
He was only terrible when he was shot, the move back down in weight after the Ruiz fight ruined him for some reason, before that his chin was rock solid
Everyone gets KOed if they fight on long enough .People were convinced that alverez would ko 40 year old ggg in their 3rd fight but ggg only survived cos Alverez is past his best too an like Pacquiao in his latter days of his career can’t ko anyone anymore
I don't think anybody questions his chin per se, but are merely pointing out, had he had to engage in the greats of the past he would have met a good few Tarvers along the way and sooner. that's not saying he had a bad chin at all.
For many years Roy Jones was not even getting HIT he was in compubox terms the most untouchable boxer that ever lived. Nobody really talks about that. Nobody could hit him. For a while no one could lay glove on this guy, much less any kind of flush meaningful punch. For a stretch Roy's chin was ironclad, if you couldn't so much as glance it.
His chin is not good. He ran off reflexes and the fear his opponents had of getting popped in the schnozz at light speed. Once people started landing on him it became apparent that he could be hurt.
It's considered terrible because it's the only visual, clear indication that he might not be one of the best fighters in history. Therefore it becomes the battleground over which his head-to-head prowess will be determined. Leading to a solidification of opinions on either side of the debate enabling them to take a definitive position on a controversial figure. It cuts through requirements for any nuanced thinking or shades of grey and is therefore comforting.
Agreed, not a glass jaw but definitely not world class. He relied on his reflexes too much the whole no jab thing etc Relying on reflexes worked for Ali to a point but he had a great chin. Not so with Jones. I saw him get flattened in person against Glenn Johnson not a big puncher.
I completely agree. I don't think his chin was granite, but it was perfectly acceptable during his prime. It's become a bit of an obvious - and tiresome - argument against him, lacking in nuance in my opinion. People forget that he was a near 50 fight veteran when he was eventually stopped, and 34 ... old for a speed and reflexes based fighter. There was no evidence of a bad chin prior to that. The fact he was then KO'd multiple times BEYOND 34 shows you there is a clear difference before getting older, and a clear difference after. I read, multiple times, that he was still 'in his prime' or just past his prime when knocked out by Danny Green - this is ludicrous. It's clear he was finished as a top force after the Johnson KO in 2004. I think it's perfectly reasonable to hold a position that his chin wasn't amazing all along, or that he might have been caught against a historic murderer's row. But to just dismiss him as 'chinny' all along IMO shows a lack of nuance and appreciation of what he was before he went on for too long ,,, as many do, of course
When a fighter slows down a little we learn how tough, (or not so) he is. Jones Jr had ATG talent, and against the fighters he faced he consistently demonstrated it. But none of them, outside of an old Mike McCallum or lazy version of James Toney could actually be considered "great" . ( Yes that does include Hopkins, who's very overrated in my opinion) Jones Jr beat who he was supposed to beat. But when he slowed a little he lost to some very average competition. And I mean devastating losses, losses in a manner that can't be explained by a fighter who just lost a step or two. It suggests those weaknesses were always their. Just hidden by Jones Jr's almost supernatural prime abilities. It makes me wonder how he would've done against a patient and calculating Monzon, a rampaging Hagler, or a fighter that would've matched him in natural ability, but much tougher Robinson. Or even a fighter like D.Tiger, that would always be in his grill, chopping at him him until he got him , especially over 15rds Jones Jr. Unlike Ali proved to be very fragile without his super human prime abilities. That must be taken into account when judging him.
Bingo. It's the one grey area for those that want to attack, to attack. He would have whooped Tarver a year or two earlier. Instead Tarver is the anti Jones messiah.
Jones barely took any damage throughout his career. We can hardly say his chin was good or that it severely deteriorated when he almost never got hit flush by heavy punches to begin with.
I’ve brought this up before elsewhere, but I’ll never figure out how people connect ‘great chin’ with ‘toughness.’ If the punches aren’t hurting a fighter with a great chin (Chuvalo, Cobb, LaMotta, Laporte, whomever you’d like to put in that category), are they really tougher than others who aren’t blessed with great chins? Why would we think so? If the punches aren’t doing damage, there’s no reason to think the guy taking them is doing something exceptional by still standing and taking more of them. I think Joe Frazier was tougher than a $2 steak. He did not have an ATG chin. But Foreman kept putting him down and couldn’t keep him down, and he kept coming hard every time he got up, knowing what kind of wrecking ball he was facing … to me, THAT is toughness. Ali is a great example of a fighter with an ATG chin AND toughness. But not because his chin didn’t betray him — he stood up to incredible body punishment just as well, as the Frazier and Foreman fights demonstrated. Durability =/= toughness imo. I think Roy was plenty tough. I think he had a good set of whiskers but not an ATG set of whiskers, fwiw. I didn’t see any dog in him after his supernatural physical abilities began to diminish. Roy Jr definitely fought on WAY too long for reasons only he understands. One would think it wasn’t money. But so did SRR. So did Ezzard Charles. I don’t judge them by the end of their careers.