George Foreman Versus Alexander Povetkin

How do you define cheater? Would you consider Ali a cheater? Floyd? Ward? Hopkins?

 

For his time he'd be considered big for the modern day he'd be around Usyk’s size shots considered a small heavyweight really shows how much size has changed over 40-50 years

 

They should be, but they weren't, and I don't even know what a clean Povetkin would look like in the ring. Also, if they're fighting on Foreman's home turf of the 70s, I don't think they tested for anything. Nor were they even illegal in the States.

 

AI spits out what it is fed, that is not credible. I doubt D'Amato ever used the word "swarmer." It is not a gym term. It is a message board term that came along long after D'Amato was dead.

 

Its a styles and size thing. Usyk style allows him to make up for his size but fighters like Foreman and Frazier were reliant on their size for their success so it would be harder for them to do well when they don't have a size advantage over their foe

 

Frazier wasn't reliant on his size wtf ? Foreman relied on his high tier power, jab, ring cutting, timing and strength, but he beat every large heavyweight available and beat Savarese as a old ass man

 

In the last week I heard Foreman never had any ability to cut off the ring and the term swarmer was invented on message boards.

 

Frazier struggled with ever larger fighter he fought while he ran through every smaller fighter but I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
Name any good large heavyweight Foreman beat.......

 

Losing to Foreman isn't a good example Foremans an all time great with more power than lennox lewis lol and he used framing tactics. Take it up with Holyfield who actually fought both prime Lewis and an old ass middle aged George

He didn't struggle with Mathis who was a skilled 240 pound contender, and if you disagree explain why Mathis doesn't posses good fundamentals and speed. He beat Bugner clearly while Bugner was always a solid. The Bonavena fight was more competitive than either of them and he was smaller than both of them. There weren't many super heavyweights in Foremans era that i agree with, most of the bigger guys couldn't compete with the top 10 though, so who's fault is that ?