Is Gennady Golovkins best win Daniel Jacobs or Canelo Alverez ?

Canelo doesn't count not because he didn't win but because even if he did win its still too debatable to be a "best win" your best win simply can't be debatable in any way shape or form. Even Jacobs was kinda debatable.

 

Anyone with a brain knows he beat Clenelo the first go around

 

Jacob's since he actually won. Regardless of my opinion that he won vs canelo in the first fight, he lost.

 

GGG's best wins were the Canelo 1 and Canelo 2 fights. That was Canelo at his peak, and GGG took him to school in both fights but in different ways. An absolute master class by GGG in those 2 wins.

 

And what makes me laugh is that people cry about the Canelo fights but forget the fights vs Derevyanchenko and Jacobs were close and controversial aswell.

I think people also forget the 1st Canelo fight was a draw which I don't think is the worst decision in the world. I had Golovkin winning 7-5 but its not out of the realms that the fight could legitimately be scored a draw.

 

I personally had Derevyanchenko edging GGG.

 

Canelo he clearly won that fight and should be given credit for it arguably the second as well but don't have a problem with the second fight since it could have gone either way. Also clearly beat Jacobs and Derevyanchenko not sure why people give him **** for those fights but whatever.

 

At the time a few people did I remember.

 

Canelo is the bigger name but put in context, beating Jacobs might be the better win, because Jacobs declined to fight for the IBF belt and as such was able to rehydrate freely and came in with a large rehydration and weight advantage. I had Golovkin beating Canelo 2x and losing the third.

Jacobs made it close but he lost. People need to stop crying about this. TLDR: Golovkin threw more punches and landed more at a higher connect rate, and he got the KD:

This content is protected

 

What rounds did you give to Jacobs?