Tyson Fury vs George Foreman - that time again?

It actually is an RPG.

You start off with a certain number of points in each category: power, stamina, speed, technique, chin, accuracy, etc. Some guys are more naturally predisposed towards certain categories than others. One beginner may already have a great chin, but poor footwork. Another beginner has good accuracy, but lacks in power.

As you train, you level up. You can choose to focus on 1-2 things to put your xp into, or try to be well rounded. Running and skipping rope raises stamina, hitting the speed and double end bag can help with timing. Hitting mitts improves combination ability, etc.

Tiers exist. An ATG h2h monster is usually untouchable by boxers 2 entire tiers blow him like a fringe contender. And even a fringe contender is often untouchable by a beginner with less than 10 fights. Styles do matter, along with how you choose to put your xp into your different category points. Generally speaking, the best h2h fighters have superb "overall ratings" just like in 2K games, you rarely see ATG h2h monsters who have poor, below average ratings in any of the main stat categories.

 

Fury wins two out of three, gets stopped badly in one.

 

Pat said Canelo beats Rocky and thought Jarrel Miller would've beaten Fury and Wilder, I'm not sure why you keep sucking up to him. Some of his analysis make sense in terms of boxing mechanics and training methods, but he also has an equal number of truly baffling and absurd opinions many trainers or boxing historians would laugh at.

 

This might be the most nerd emoji thing I've ever read in this forum..........

 

Certainly seems plausible Miller could beat Wilder. Canelo beating Rocky is maybe less likely but not beyond the realm of possibility.

 

And yet you haven't explained how it's wrong. You do understand it's an analogy, right?

How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?