Battling Jim Johnson vs Jack Johnson Revisited

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bronson666, Aug 6, 2025.


  1. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    69
    70
    Aug 6, 2025
    No one truly knows. But quibbling about the weight of a fighter 100 years ago and whether he was lying seems fruitless. I have no reason to suspect Wills was lying about sparring Johnson.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    I was Ivich and I was banned for an inappropriate post ,nothing more.

    I'm not banned anywhere I posted on both sites this hour.

    You came here to dump on Johnson end of.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    Why don't you address the questions I asked.
    You have no reason to suspect Johnson was lying about sparring with Wills either have you?
     
  4. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,320
    3,790
    Jan 6, 2024
    Given the eternal rematch system this is very misleading. Most everyones got single wins over everyone even Wills. You can't really construct a case this way under the circumsances.
     
    Homericlegend03 and Bronson666 like this.
  5. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    69
    70
    Aug 6, 2025
    Johnson lied about a lot of things. His credibility is suspect. What did Wills lie about to call his integrity into question?
     
    Homericlegend03 likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    Q.Did Johnson lose to any of those they did?
    A.No.

    I asked you why you think that prime for prime.
    Jeannette and Langford beat Johnson,would you be good enough to give me your reasons?

    I can readily accept that a distracted ,ill prepared Johnson could lose to either,but why, prime for prime , do you pick them over him? Gunboat Smith beat Langford by just utilising the jab,Do you think Smith was a better boxer than Johnson?
    Langford also lost to Jim Flynn whom Johnson toyed with twice.

    Jeannette lost to Sandy Ferguson twice,Ferguson was cake for Johnson .

    Jeannette lost to JimJohnson twice ,a 35 years old Johnson, fighting with a broken arm still managed a draw.
    So you can see why I'm puzzled by your picks here.
    The OP of this thread once stated McVey was competitive withJohnson in all their 3 fights ,he wasn't ,he was never in with a chance in any of them and sustained cruel beatings in each fight.I posted the round by rounds reports of those fights and he dismissed them saying McVey was competitive because he went the distance twice and was ko'd in the last round of their 3rd fight.
    When I pointed out Jeffries went into the 15th rd , Burns into the 14th, and Ketchel into the 12 and none of those fights were competitive he had no coherent answer .
    Jeannette ,Langford ,and Mcvey were floored multiple times in their respective fights with Johnson.
    Johnson was never floored in any of their contests and never in any danger of being ,so you see my dilemma with your opinion.
    My inquiry is a genuine one,motivated solely by curiosity,and certainly not animosity.
    I look forward to your reply.
    ps Neither Langford or McVey have wins over Johnson ,and Jeannette only has one a disputed dsq,nor do Ferguson JimJohnson,Flynn,Thompson ,Black Bill,Martin hold wins over Johnson,so your argument fails.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2025 at 3:25 AM
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    Produce a primary source that says Wills embarrassed Johnson in sparring and I will readily accept it,otherwise its just one man's opinion against anothers.

    The quote by the way comes from Joe Botti's book on Jeannette pages 360/361.It cites no primary source except for Wills himself .
    The spar occurred in July1912 when Johnson was training for his 2nd fight with Flynn . Wills had had a total of 9 fights 5 of them against debutees and had been ko'd in2rounds by Johnson's sparring a partner Kid Cotton that year .
    Now you've continuously made a big play about how Langford,Jeannette, and McVey were green when they were outclassed by Johnson,that being the case do you think it likely that 8 fight Wills who had been ko'd by Johnson's sparring partner 6 months earlier would be able to embarrass Johnson?

    NB.Joe Botti is seriously off the wall on the subject of Joe Jeannette,and eagerly swallowed wholesale everything Jeannette is quoted as saying,including him weighing165lbs for his last fight with Johnson.He worships at the shrine of Joe Jeannette.
    Botti invited me to join his web site, I lasted about a day,any non-acceptance of his entrenched and totally biased opinions meets with a hellacious,hysterical over reaction.

    NB.Joe Botti used to post here until the Forum got wise to him. I must add Botti's record as a trainer is excellent.It's his authorship I take issue with.

    Below are two reviews on Amazon on Botti's Jeannette book.
    • This content is protected

      Mr. G. P. Shaw
      1.0 out of 5 stars Writing as if its Jeanette talking just doesnt work and reads like a lot of half remembered facts about the times ...
      Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 21 September 2015
      Verified Purchase
      Shame that the first book on such a richly deserved subject should be written in such an idiosyncratic way. Writing as if its Jeanette talking just doesnt work and reads like a lot of half remembered facts about the times he lived in interspersed with newspaper clippings of his fights. Really difficult to read. Clay Moyle's book on Sam Langford gets the feel just right. Could have been much better. Shame.
    • Peter
      1.0 out of 5 stars Fiction disguised as fact
      Reviewed in the United States on 6 February 2014
      Verified Purchase
      I was so excited to get this book, I have wanted to read the exploits of a boxing immortal like Joe Jennette for years.

      This man did virtually everything in the ring and was one of the best heavyweights of the day, quite possibly the equal of better of the great Jack Johnson.

      Imagine my surprise to find that this book was written in the first person as if Jennette had written it himself. I am sorry but this was not the way to have written the book. Jennette has been dead for over half a century so it is not as if it could be written as an As Told By...

      Now I don't wish to denigrate the writing ability of the author, he is very clever and the book did read well, but I simply couldn't take to a book that was fiction disguised as fact.

      Still waiting for a real biography of Joe Jennette.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2025 at 6:29 AM
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    You are still ducking my questions.
     
  9. PrimoGT

    PrimoGT Member Full Member

    340
    367
    Jul 20, 2025
    So many of the fights were "NO DECISION" in those days it's actually quite impressive to get a win at all.
     
  10. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    69
    70
    Aug 6, 2025
    This is your go-to tactic when cornered and unable to answer questions. Insist on primary source, even though most of your primary sources are 100+ year old obscure news articles from fringe newspapers without any writer or journalist credit.

    Now tell us why Wills would lie, what were some of his other lies? Jeannette said Johnson never gave him a title shot, now you’ll call him a liar. Langford said he never got a title shot from Jack either. Another liar right? It’s a pattern with you, everyone who was actually there and speaking from their own experience was a liar if their comments don’t align with your agenda.

    Meanwhile, Johnson had been caught in many a lie and dishonest deed but he is the one you give the benefit of the doubt to because you’ll defend him to your last breath.
     
    Homericlegend03 likes this.
  11. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    69
    70
    Aug 6, 2025
    A tipster has shared an interesting nugget with me. Turns out you were on BS denying Johnson struggled with Battling Jim. To the extent you insisted that poster provide you a primary source indicating he struggled. You wouldn’t let it go until he produced a post you made here stating Jack struggled with Jim. You just said it again here on this thread. So what type of man trolls a poster for a primary source (whenever you are cornered) about Johnson struggling with Battling Jim, yet he himself insisted and admits Johnson struggled. That is some very bizarre and unethical behavior. Shame on you.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jeannette said he weighed 165lbs for his last fight with Johnson.
    I asked you do you believe him? You haven't answered.
    Langford said he weighed 147lbs when he fought Johnson .
    I asked you do you believe him? You haven't answered.
    Why won't you address my questions.
    WERE THEY TELLING THE TRUTH OR NOT?

    YES?

    NO?
    It's that simple.
    Quack! Quack! Quack!
    Still pretending you aren't Ghost Of Dempsey from BS and that now you are getting pms supplying you with info from there ? lol

    You are one ****ed up individual do you know that!
    Why didn't I let you get banned and go into limbo with the other two on BS?

    That's one good turn that's come back to bite me in the arse ! lol
    Lesson learned.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2025 at 9:33 AM
  13. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    69
    70
    Aug 6, 2025
    I answered your questions, you didn't like the answer. Who is the definitive authority on what Jeannette weighed 119 years ago? Certainly not you.

    Again, Langford may have weighed 147 or 156, what was the name of the individual who weighed him, can we revive him from the grave with a heater and some strong smelling salts?

    Again, I'm not the Ghost, but I am obviously haunting you in your sleep. You are unhinged over a simple disagreement. Is this how you conduct yourself in real life? 97K posts and more than half of them are you arguing to the death with strangers. I feel sorry for anyone within earshot.

    Now why did you torment a poster on BS to provide a primary source claiming Jack Johnson struggled with Battling Jim...when you yourself said he struggled right here? That seems hypocritical and petty. Not surprising though, now don't duck this question.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,620
    28,886
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'll give you the same answer I gave you on BS Johnson did not struggle with Battling JIm,he struggled with a broken arm,

    How long is your ban Ghost?

    Nobody has mentioned you,it's as though you have disappeared into the ether, leaving not a trace of your bilious presence behind.
     
  15. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    69
    70
    Aug 6, 2025
    No, you said Johnson struggled with Battling Jim for another 7 rounds--an injured arm or not, he struggled and in your own words, all this as you insisted on a primary source from another poster. That is petty.

    You keep bringing up Ghost, not sure why. Sounds like paranoia, he is living rent free in your head while not even posting. I would call that a win for the Ghost.

    I see you went life and death with a poster on this thread...arguing weights and behaving like an angry Mr. Know-it-all as usual. You ducked his questions and then started crying victim.

    You argued the weight of Jeannette in the last fight with Johnson, where Jeannette said he was 165 or 162, coming down from a supposed 185 in their prior fight. You want us to believe that Johnson was only 185 for McVey in April of 1906 and packed on 20 pounds of muscle in just five months for his last fight against Jeannette in November of 1906. Must have been some magical PEDs back in 1906.

    You will quote an anonymous news article from 120 years ago as your "primary source", while stating "some reporter at ringside said"...really, what was his name? What was the name of the man who weighed the fighters on those days? Lets see how far we can drill down into the minutia of each fight.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2025 at 1:00 PM
    Boxing GOAT likes this.