Jeffries vs. Zhang

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:24 PM.


Who’d win?

  1. Jeffries

    7 vote(s)
    41.2%
  2. Zhang

    10 vote(s)
    58.8%
  1. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,872
    23,229
    Jul 21, 2012
    Bang presents a style of boxing Jim has never seen before. He'd get obliterated.
     
    MarkusFlorez99 and Seamus like this.
  2. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,518
    1,669
    Aug 18, 2012
    Zhang is unskilled and untrained.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,928
    24,838
    Jan 3, 2007
    This is one fight where I’d favor Zhang. But it’s not exactly a practical matchup. The rules and conditions of the two eras were so different to the point to where you’re almost looking at two different sports.
     
    MarkusFlorez99 and greynotsoold like this.
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,031
    45,259
    Feb 11, 2005
    The Olympic silver medalist, bronze WC medalist is unskilled. No, he was old when he turned pro.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,640
    28,918
    Jun 2, 2006
    And how many super heavyweights of any class did he prove his chin against?
     
  6. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    89
    88
    Aug 6, 2025
    I think Jeffries figures out how to get inside and stay inside. Wear down Zhang over twelve rounds and likely stop him.

    If someone can explain the greatness of Agit Kabayel who KO'd Zhang earlier this year or Jerry Forrest who fought him to a draw in 2021 I might be swayed to reconsider.
     
  7. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,756
    4,648
    Apr 20, 2024
    Zhang doesn’t just have a straight left. He is very much a two-handed puncher and probably one of the biggest punchers at HW of all time. His right hook KO of Joyce was a thing of beauty against a massively proven chin. Even him sleeping Wilder the way that he did is impressive since we’ve seen Wilder take loads and loads of huge shots throughout his career, especially against Fury and Ortiz. Zhang even had Hrgovic stunned a fair few times, who we’ve seen as well has a very good chin. Zhang is a bonafide puncher and has two bricks for hands. Trying to outlast artillery like that is strategic suicide.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  8. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,518
    1,669
    Aug 18, 2012
    Zhang is untrained. Can’t take body blows. Can’t fight at any distance. One - Two body blows ends it.
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,395
    9,332
    Jul 15, 2008
    Somebody is a Jeffries believer ! Let's keep in mind Zhang is forty plus ... that's up there ..
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,640
    28,918
    Jun 2, 2006
    Ever wonder how a 42years old Marciano would have fared against Kabayel?
     
    Seamus likes this.
  11. Bronson666

    Bronson666 New Member Full Member

    89
    88
    Aug 6, 2025
    No I haven't. Not sure what Rocky has to do with this mythical match up. Zhang had only 29 fights before fighting Kabayal, so not a very battle-worn 42.
     
  12. Alexandrow Vids

    Alexandrow Vids Active Member Full Member

    500
    233
    Oct 28, 2014
    I really like Zhang but I think Jeffries would win here.

    Jeffries had Tons of Stamina , was built like a Tank and by far tougher than most competition today.
    Sure he would take a lot of Bombs from Zhang, it depends on the referee how long he lets the fight go
    but I think Jeffries would overtake him in the 5th or 6th round and knock out Zhang in the 8th round.

    It doesn't matter if Zhang has better skills, Jeffries has the durability and was also quite fast
    to make Zhang miss a few times and every hit that zhang misses plays into Jeffries' hands, while
    Jeffries in turn can easily go 20+ rounds.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,640
    28,918
    Jun 2, 2006
    It's for purposes of comparison ,actually I ****ed up I meant to type Jeffries,ie a 42 years old Jeffries v Kabayel.

    Must have been thinking about the Rocky v Wilder thread.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,640
    28,918
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jeffries against a super heavyweight top end puncher is unproven.We simply don't know how his chin would hold up.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  15. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    16,795
    27,567
    Aug 22, 2021
    Not to dis Jeffries and size isn’t everything but it still is something and it’s significance varies in accord with how much a fighter incorporates his greater size to advantage into his overall style.

    I think Jeffries did rely heavily on his greater size, strength and relatively greater durability as compared to somewhat smaller opposition.

    Therefore, I see Jeffries directly losing those size related advantages as he begins to face opposition of equal or greater size.

    When he first defeated Fitz, Jeff basically said that it was his size, durability, strength and youth that won the day.

    Now it’s documented that even old, so much lighter Corbett somehow managed to wobble Jeff - which might be a possible red flag as to the true resilience of Jeff’s whiskers.

    As to power, Jeff could not KO Sharkey over a total of 45 rounds - yet spindly Bob Fitz turned the trick twice over less than 10 rounds in total?

    Zhang is your classic under/over betting prospect. Big danger for Jeff in the early rounds - a sniper like, selective super power puncher - but IF Jeff survives same then his own chances of winning naturally increase with each passing round.

    Suffice to say, being assigned by CompuBox to tally Zhang’s punches during a fight isn’t exactly going to see said operator incur RSI. Lol.