Maybe Rubin Hurricane Carter isn't as innocent as believed

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Sep 4, 2023.


  1. Bronson666

    Bronson666 Member Full Member

    124
    143
    Aug 6, 2025
    It was easier to sway public opinion back then. People didn't have the internet to do their own research and vet what was being dished out be Hollywood and a biased media. The power of celebrity endorsements went a long way back then. Having Dylan as an ally helped to influence other celebrities who thought they were doing a good deed. Had they known all of the horrible things Carter had done in his life perhaps they could have made a more educated choice rather than rally behind an evil thug.
     
  2. Homericlegend03

    Homericlegend03 Member Full Member

    255
    334
    Jul 22, 2025
    Carter was an awful human being but there were some very underhanded and murky things going on with the handling of both his cases. The nature of his character is irrelevant in that, now I've wouldn't have gone up to bat for him but the truth of the matter is that he did not get a fair trial. He was a truly bad person though who may have been a psychopath but even bad people deserve fair trials.
     
    PrimoGT, Journeyman92 and Joeywill like this.
  3. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,270
    26,409
    Jun 26, 2009
    I would say that anyone who would lie on the stand to convict someone or coerce a witness to do the same, lie about/manufacture/plant evidence is an awful human being.

    There’s one Rubin Carter. There’s a bunch of people who conspired to do the things I described in the above sentence, so whatever kind of human being Carter was, in this case he was far outnumbered by other awful human beings.

    He lost a good chunk of his life. They lost nothing.

    That isn’t justice.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2025
    PrimoGT and Homericlegend03 like this.
  4. Homericlegend03

    Homericlegend03 Member Full Member

    255
    334
    Jul 22, 2025
    You right. I have no retort, using past transgressions or future transgressions is a slippery slope for convictions.
     
  5. AntonioMartin1

    AntonioMartin1 Jeanette Full Member

    4,723
    3,839
    Jan 23, 2022
    Id like to note that Denzel Washington was involved in another movie in which he played a highly fictionalized and somewhat sanctified version of a character (if you can call this movie a sanctification): American Gangster.

    The detective who was after Frank Lucas said that he and Frank Lucas being friendly afterwards was total BS.

    That is Hollywood for you sometimes. I wish many of those so called biopics presented the actual story, how it happened. But, also, a lot of times producers only have what the object (or their family, like in La Bamba) say that took place. And who does not want to be seen in a better light specially by the larger public?
     
  6. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,270
    26,409
    Jun 26, 2009
    Yeah hardly any Hollywood-ification of a ‘true story’ tells the true story. They mold the story not necessarily to obfuscate the truth (in most cases the screenwriter isn’t some kind of investigative journalist digging for the real story, but hack going off what he thinks he knows the story to be … then adding elements and even characters for drama. They’re making a movie, not depicting history as it happened.

    A simple example is the Iron Claw movie, which tells the story of the Von Erich family and how all but one of the kids ended up tragically dying (in part because their father was a horrible human being who drove them to it). In reality, there was even one more son who died tragically (I think another suicide) and when the filmmaker was asked about cutting him completely out of the movie the answer was along the lines of ‘Geez, don’t you think it’s bad enough?’ He was trying to get across the essence of this tragic family and thought that adding yet another sad, young death would just make it too depressing for anyone to even watch … when in reality that’s what happened.
     
  7. Bronson666

    Bronson666 Member Full Member

    124
    143
    Aug 6, 2025
    I think there was some sloppy police work, but I don't know if anything was intentionally done to frame him.
     
  8. Homericlegend03

    Homericlegend03 Member Full Member

    255
    334
    Jul 22, 2025
    I mean if you were ever in a situation were jail time was involved would you want to go to jail off the back of bad police work. The police were in this case so sloppy that it could be considered criminally negligent.
     
  9. davidjay

    davidjay Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,305
    884
    Feb 23, 2009
    Was he guilty of some serious crimes? Probably.
    Was he guilty of this murder? Perhaps.
    Was he guilty beyond reasonable doubt? I don't think so.

    I don't know about the States, but from the sixties until the early nineties corruption was endemic amongst British detectives and one of the most notorious examples was the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad. Some of them were decent men, others were of the opinion that a criminal was a criminal and if they needed to fabricate evidence to ensure a conviction, so be it. The suspect was guilty, if not of the crime he was being charged with then with something else, so may as well make sure he's locked up. Reuben Carter would have known all about that.
     
    Homericlegend03 likes this.
  10. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,098
    6,898
    Sep 8, 2013
    Another misleading part of the movie was making it seem like Carter got robbed against Giardello. Joey won the fight fair and square. The decision wasn't particularly close. But, why bother with facts when they get in the way of misguided sympathy for the protagonist?
     
  11. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,058
    21,086
    Sep 22, 2021
    Aye, I believe Joey / his family sued over that lol.
     
    Smokin Bert likes this.
  12. Lonsdale81

    Lonsdale81 Member Full Member

    385
    568
    May 19, 2025
    Giardello is a bit of an overlooked fighter imo.. he beat Dick Tiger, Tiger Jones & Billy Graham all multiple times .. & probably deserved better than a draw against Fullmer too.. just wasn't consistent enough
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2025
  13. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,121
    7,355
    Apr 29, 2020
    Hi Buddy.
    Overlooked fighter indeed, that said, it puts Downes in a good light in that he beat Joey on points, and Giardello went on to post wins over, Dupas, Hank, Tiger, and Carter, plus a fading Robinson.
    stay safe Lonsdale81, chat soon.
    Mike.
     
    Lonsdale81 likes this.
  14. Lonsdale81

    Lonsdale81 Member Full Member

    385
    568
    May 19, 2025
    Was just thinking about Downes.. beat Paul Pender too & went very close to a world title at LHW, troubling Willie Pastrano in 64 before suffering an 11th round stoppage.. in fact his win over Fullmer aged pretty well also..
     
  15. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,121
    7,355
    Apr 29, 2020
    Hi Buddy.
    Have met and spoken to him on many occasions at various boxing events or functions, he was a quite a character, and had many anecdotes and tales of his career, he said that the beating and stoppage administered by Tiger, paled as to the beating Spider Webb dished out to him many years later, he rated Webb as a smart boxer and a very accurate and hurtful puncher, and the aforementioned hiding he got, left him bedridden for days,and weeks before he felt able to contemplate training again, and again reiterated that he did not beat Robinson, just the ghost, he was a very modest, and unassuming man, that belied his public persona, not one of our greats, but a fighter who achieved plenty without being the most skillful, as he would always admit.
    stay safe buddy, chat soon.
    Mike.
     
    Lonsdale81 likes this.