It was William Edgar (W.E.) Harding, and it was in March 1885. https://archive.org/details/sim_national-police-gazette_1885-03-21_45_392/page/10/mode/1up And the write-up contains BS claim that Harding "has witnessed more prize fights ... than any man in this country". Harding was born in 1848. Joseph Elliott (NY Herald) and Mark McGuire (NY Sun) had seen and reported fights that were held before Harding was even born. Both were still alive.
I think Harding was a stooge for Richard Fox. I have seen his name bandied around a lot of fights at this time. Strange to rate Fryer that high as the Kilrain fight had not occurred at that point.
Yes, he was the sporting editor of NPG (from 1880) and of New York Daily News (from 1867 allegedly, can't confirm; he often quoted NY Daily News in his sporting column in NPG, ie quoting himself) at the same time.
Revised end of year ratings for gloved contests,in the decade, if bare knuckle fights were included then the greatest beneficiaries would be Jem Smith, Kilrain, Mitchell and Sullivan in terms of rank and longevity. The reason I am dealing exclusively with gloves is to try and show that the decade was a vibrant period of marquis of Queensbury rules. It is often that we see the decade excluded when dealing with the glove period. The ratings are a bit iffey for 1880/1881 but I'm reasonably happy with the later years. 1880 1-Goss 2-Miller 3-Ryan 4-Foley 5-CC Smith 6-Greenfield 7-Elliott 8-Sullivan 9-Dalton 10-Stewart 1881 1. Ryan 2. Sullivan 3. Miller 4. Farnan 5. Greenfield 6. Hadley 7. C C Smith 8. Dalton 9. Wilson 10. Stewart 1882 1-Sullivan 2_Farnan 3-Hadley 4-Godfrey 5-Kilrain 6-C C Smith 7-Mitchell 8-Cleary 09-Elliott 10-Ryan 1883 1-Sullivan 2-Mitchell 3-Godfrey 4-Kilrain 5-Miller 6-Farnan 7-Cleary 8-McCaffrey 9-Greenfield 10-Foley 1884 1-Sullivan 2-McCaffrey 3-Kilrain 4-Burke 5-Mitchell 6-Farnan 7-Cleary 8-Godfrey 9-Cardiff 10-Thompson 1885 1-Sullivan 2-McCaffrey 3-Burke 4-Mitchell 5-Kilrain 6-Fryer 7-Cleary 8-Cardiff 9-Godfrey 10-Lees 1886 1-Sullivan 2-Kilrain 3-Cardiff 4-Mitchell 5-Nolan 6-Burke 7-McCaffrey 8-Killen 9-Godfrey 10-Lannon 1887 1-Sullivan 2-Kilrain 3-Cardiff 4-Killen 5-Burke 6-Nolan 7-Mitchell 8-Godfrey 9-Jackson 10-McAuliffe 1888 1-Sullivan 2-Jackson 3-Killeen 4-Kilrain 5-Cardiff 6-Godfrey 7-Burke 8-Slavin 9-McAuliffe 10-Ashton 1889 1-Jackson 2-Sullivan 3-McAuliffe 4-Godfrey 5-Slavin 6-Killen 7--Cardiff 8-Kilrain 9-Ashton 10-Goddard
Here are the ratings from sportsratings. Or its earlier site can't tell what the name is because I'm using wayback. I added the losses bit myself. 1881 Sullivan Hadley McCaffrey Mike Donovan Jack Davis Morris Grant Jack Burke Mitchell George Rooke Charles McCoy 1882 Sullivan Hadley Peter Jackson Jack Davis Mike Donovan George Godfrey Cleary Kilrain Jack Burke McCaffrey 1883 Sullivan McHenry Johnson Virgo Small CC Smith Hadley Gus Lambert George Taylor Godfrey Jem Goode Kilrain 1884 Sullivan Billy Wilson Tom Hinch James Dalton Mervine Thompson CC Smith OH Smith McHenry Johnson Dave Campbell Jack McGee 1885 Sullivan George LaBlanche JW Curtis Cardiff Tom Lees CC Smith Lannon Billy Wilson Jimmy Doherty OH Smith 1886 Sullivan Conley Jack Dempsey Killen Cardiff Kilrain Denver Ed Smith Peter Nolan Joe McAuliffe CC Smith 1887 Killen Sullivan Conley Cardiff Kilrain Joe McAuliffe Jack Dempsey Bill Bradburn Peter Nolan Denver Ed Smith 1888 Killen Peter Jackson Joe McAuliffe Sullivan Slavin Conley Cardiff Denver Ed Smith Jack Dempsey Jack Fallon 1889 Peter Jackson Joe McAuliffe Sullivan Killen Slavin Fitzsimmons Denver Ed Smith Goddard Jack Fallon Corbett
Interesting at least! I'd love to hear the arguments for Viro Small, O H Smith, Jack McGee, J W Curtis, Jimmy Doherty, George Taylor, and Dave Campbell before drilling down into some others!
https://web.archive.org/web/20091027001016/http://us.share.geocities.com/mgpaul2/Fights.htm They do a detailed breakdown of how each fighter got their ranking. The big flaw with these rankings is they include MWs(and later LHWs) who weren't really combo fighters and didn't fight at HW. But I think only 2-3 got into the top 10 in these years.
Aw, these are the ratings compiled by the late, great Mike Paul, a good friend. They were computerised rankings, a precursor of the likes of Boxrec. They got more accurate as the years went on and the data base got bigger.
Foley's Hall in Sydney was the scene of near weekly boxing shows in the 1880's featuring an unreal amount of talent eg on August 16 1886 Dooley, Fitz, Newton, Jackson, Slavin and Billy McCarthy all appeared. Jackson, Fitz, Slavin and O'Donnell were on another night and these are typical bills, not outliners. Hall, Foley, Lees, Buffalo Costello, Prof.Donaldson, Miller, Goddard all boxed there, incredible.
1880 - What had Elliott done with the gloves to be ranked? All I know is that he was outclassed by Ryan in 1878 in an exhibition, and then lost to Dwyer without gloves in 1879. - What had Foley done with the gloves to be ranked? He beat Abe Hicken bareknuckle in 1879 at middleweight, had he had any gloved fights or fought any heavyweights? - CBZ says that Jem Mace organised a tournament in 1879 in Australia, which was won by Bill Farnan - Do you know if that's right? Boxrec lists these fights but I can't find a mention of it elsewhere. If true then Farnan probably needs to be on the list for 1880. 1881 - Burke's win in the heavyweight competition should probably get him into the top 10 - Wilson (Collins) is presumably included for his draw with Greenfield, but this was without gloves.
As stated, the 1880/81 are iffey, for 1880 I included the top contenders that had had some glove experience, Foley had plenty of glove encounters, indeed his 1878 47 round clash with Peter Newton was one of the first chief glove battles. I have seen a lot of mentions of the tourney that Farnan won and a load more fights too. He certainly was close to an 1880 rating but its a matter of opinion, he had yet to score a signature win, similarly with Burke's win in the 1881 tourney, despite been a big advocate of Jack, I felt it was not of sufficient quality. Wilson was sparring a lot with gloves at this time, including with George Fryer, but in truth it is a poor selection.
Has anyone done a proper book on the Aussie scene in the 1880's-1890's? It was such a hotbed of talent... Fitzsimmons, Jackson, Chooynski, Young Griffo, Goddard, Slavin, Mick Dooley, Tut Ryan, Jim Hall... and much under the guidance of the above mentioned hard man Larry Foley.
Add in Owen Sullivan, Dan Creedon, Steve O;Donnell and you see the depth at the turn of 1890. It is interesting to see the best boxers by nationality for the decade. Some licence is taken with this list; America; Sullivan, Kilrain, McCaffrey, Killen, Nolan/McAuliffe Australia Jackson, Miller, Slavin, Goddard, Farnan/Lees Ireland; Burke, Cleary, Ryan, O.Sullivan, Elliott England; Mitchell. Greenfield, Fryer, Jem Smith, Ed Smith Canada; Cardiff, Godtrey, Lannon, Lambert, Fell New Zealand; Laing, Fitz, Matthews, Pettergell, Slade I actually think if you picked the top 10 Aussie fighters for the decade, that they defeat the usa,