The 1880's!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mattdonnellon, Aug 23, 2025.


  1. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,968
    2,411
    Jul 11, 2005
    It was William Edgar (W.E.) Harding, and it was in March 1885.
    https://archive.org/details/sim_national-police-gazette_1885-03-21_45_392/page/10/mode/1up

    And the write-up contains BS claim that Harding "has witnessed more prize fights ... than any man in this country". Harding was born in 1848. Joseph Elliott (NY Herald) and Mark McGuire (NY Sun) had seen and reported fights that were held before Harding was even born. Both were still alive.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  2. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    I think Harding was a stooge for Richard Fox. I have seen his name bandied around a lot of fights at this time. Strange to rate Fryer that high as the Kilrain fight had not occurred at that point.
     
  3. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,968
    2,411
    Jul 11, 2005
    Yes, he was the sporting editor of NPG (from 1880) and of New York Daily News (from 1867 allegedly, can't confirm; he often quoted NY Daily News in his sporting column in NPG, ie quoting himself) at the same time.
     
  4. SimonLock

    SimonLock Member Full Member

    395
    592
    Nov 15, 2018
  5. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Revised end of year ratings for gloved contests,in the decade, if bare knuckle fights were included then the greatest beneficiaries would be Jem Smith, Kilrain, Mitchell and Sullivan in terms of rank and longevity. The reason I am dealing exclusively with gloves is to try and show that the decade was a vibrant period of marquis of Queensbury rules. It is often that we see the decade excluded when dealing with the glove period. The ratings are a bit iffey for 1880/1881 but I'm reasonably happy with the later years.

    1880

    1-Goss
    2-Miller
    3-Ryan
    4-Foley
    5-CC Smith
    6-Greenfield
    7-Elliott
    8-Sullivan
    9-Dalton
    10-Stewart

    1881

    1. Ryan
    2. Sullivan
    3. Miller
    4. Farnan
    5. Greenfield
    6. Hadley
    7. C C Smith
    8. Dalton
    9. Wilson
    10. Stewart

    1882

    1-Sullivan
    2_Farnan
    3-Hadley
    4-Godfrey
    5-Kilrain
    6-C C Smith
    7-Mitchell
    8-Cleary
    09-Elliott
    10-Ryan

    1883

    1-Sullivan
    2-Mitchell
    3-Godfrey
    4-Kilrain
    5-Miller
    6-Farnan
    7-Cleary
    8-McCaffrey
    9-Greenfield
    10-Foley

    1884

    1-Sullivan
    2-McCaffrey
    3-Kilrain
    4-Burke
    5-Mitchell
    6-Farnan
    7-Cleary
    8-Godfrey
    9-Cardiff
    10-Thompson

    1885

    1-Sullivan
    2-McCaffrey
    3-Burke
    4-Mitchell
    5-Kilrain
    6-Fryer
    7-Cleary
    8-Cardiff
    9-Godfrey
    10-Lees

    1886

    1-Sullivan
    2-Kilrain
    3-Cardiff
    4-Mitchell
    5-Nolan
    6-Burke
    7-McCaffrey
    8-Killen
    9-Godfrey
    10-Lannon

    1887

    1-Sullivan
    2-Kilrain
    3-Cardiff
    4-Killen
    5-Burke
    6-Nolan
    7-Mitchell
    8-Godfrey
    9-Jackson
    10-McAuliffe

    1888

    1-Sullivan
    2-Jackson
    3-Killeen
    4-Kilrain
    5-Cardiff
    6-Godfrey
    7-Burke
    8-Slavin
    9-McAuliffe
    10-Ashton

    1889

    1-Jackson
    2-Sullivan
    3-McAuliffe
    4-Godfrey
    5-Slavin
    6-Killen
    7--Cardiff
    8-Kilrain
    9-Ashton
    10-Goddard
     
    mcvey likes this.
  6. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,654
    4,070
    Jan 6, 2024
    Here are the ratings from sportsratings. Or its earlier site can't tell what the name is because I'm using wayback. I added the losses bit myself.


    1881
    Sullivan
    Hadley
    McCaffrey
    Mike Donovan
    Jack Davis
    Morris Grant
    Jack Burke
    Mitchell
    George Rooke
    Charles McCoy

    1882
    Sullivan
    Hadley
    Peter Jackson
    Jack Davis
    Mike Donovan
    George Godfrey
    Cleary
    Kilrain
    Jack Burke
    McCaffrey

    1883
    Sullivan
    McHenry Johnson
    Virgo Small
    CC Smith
    Hadley
    Gus Lambert
    George Taylor
    Godfrey
    Jem Goode
    Kilrain

    1884
    Sullivan
    Billy Wilson
    Tom Hinch
    James Dalton
    Mervine Thompson
    CC Smith
    OH Smith
    McHenry Johnson
    Dave Campbell
    Jack McGee

    1885
    Sullivan
    George LaBlanche
    JW Curtis
    Cardiff
    Tom Lees
    CC Smith
    Lannon
    Billy Wilson
    Jimmy Doherty
    OH Smith

    1886
    Sullivan
    Conley
    Jack Dempsey
    Killen
    Cardiff
    Kilrain
    Denver Ed Smith
    Peter Nolan
    Joe McAuliffe
    CC Smith

    1887
    Killen
    Sullivan
    Conley
    Cardiff
    Kilrain
    Joe McAuliffe
    Jack Dempsey
    Bill Bradburn
    Peter Nolan
    Denver Ed Smith

    1888
    Killen
    Peter Jackson
    Joe McAuliffe
    Sullivan
    Slavin
    Conley
    Cardiff
    Denver Ed Smith
    Jack Dempsey
    Jack Fallon

    1889
    Peter Jackson
    Joe McAuliffe
    Sullivan
    Killen
    Slavin
    Fitzsimmons
    Denver Ed Smith
    Goddard
    Jack Fallon
    Corbett
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  7. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Interesting at least!
    I'd love to hear the arguments for Viro Small, O H Smith, Jack McGee, J W Curtis, Jimmy Doherty, George Taylor, and Dave Campbell before drilling down into some others!
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2025
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  8. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,654
    4,070
    Jan 6, 2024
    https://web.archive.org/web/20091027001016/http://us.share.geocities.com/mgpaul2/Fights.htm

    They do a detailed breakdown of how each fighter got their ranking.

    The big flaw with these rankings is they include MWs(and later LHWs) who weren't really combo fighters and didn't fight at HW. But I think only 2-3 got into the top 10 in these years.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  9. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Aw, these are the ratings compiled by the late, great Mike Paul, a good friend. They were computerised rankings, a precursor of the likes of Boxrec. They got more accurate as the years went on and the data base got bigger.
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  10. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Foley's Hall in Sydney was the scene of near weekly boxing shows in the 1880's featuring an unreal amount of talent eg on August 16 1886 Dooley, Fitz, Newton, Jackson, Slavin and Billy McCarthy all appeared. Jackson, Fitz, Slavin and O'Donnell were on another night and these are typical bills, not outliners. Hall, Foley, Lees, Buffalo Costello, Prof.Donaldson, Miller, Goddard all boxed there, incredible.
     
    Seamus and SimonLock like this.
  11. SimonLock

    SimonLock Member Full Member

    395
    592
    Nov 15, 2018
    1880
    - What had Elliott done with the gloves to be ranked? All I know is that he was outclassed by Ryan in 1878 in an exhibition, and then lost to Dwyer without gloves in 1879.
    - What had Foley done with the gloves to be ranked? He beat Abe Hicken bareknuckle in 1879 at middleweight, had he had any gloved fights or fought any heavyweights?
    - CBZ says that Jem Mace organised a tournament in 1879 in Australia, which was won by Bill Farnan - Do you know if that's right? Boxrec lists these fights but I can't find a mention of it elsewhere. If true then Farnan probably needs to be on the list for 1880.

    1881
    - Burke's win in the heavyweight competition should probably get him into the top 10
    - Wilson (Collins) is presumably included for his draw with Greenfield, but this was without gloves.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  12. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    As stated, the 1880/81 are iffey, for 1880 I included the top contenders that had had some glove experience, Foley had plenty of glove encounters, indeed his 1878 47 round clash with Peter Newton was one of the first chief glove battles. I have seen a lot of mentions of the tourney that Farnan won and a load more fights too. He certainly was close to an 1880 rating but its a matter of opinion, he had yet to score a signature win, similarly with Burke's win in the 1881 tourney, despite been a big advocate of Jack, I felt it was not of sufficient quality. Wilson was sparring a lot with gloves at this time, including with George Fryer, but in truth it is a poor selection.
     
    SimonLock likes this.
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,450
    45,953
    Feb 11, 2005
    Has anyone done a proper book on the Aussie scene in the 1880's-1890's? It was such a hotbed of talent... Fitzsimmons, Jackson, Chooynski, Young Griffo, Goddard, Slavin, Mick Dooley, Tut Ryan, Jim Hall... and much under the guidance of the above mentioned hard man Larry Foley.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'd forgotten Choynski fought there.
     
    mattdonnellon and HistoryZero26 like this.
  15. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Add in Owen Sullivan, Dan Creedon, Steve O;Donnell and you see the depth at the turn of 1890.
    It is interesting to see the best boxers by nationality for the decade. Some licence is taken with this list;
    America; Sullivan, Kilrain, McCaffrey, Killen, Nolan/McAuliffe
    Australia Jackson, Miller, Slavin, Goddard, Farnan/Lees
    Ireland; Burke, Cleary, Ryan, O.Sullivan, Elliott
    England; Mitchell. Greenfield, Fryer, Jem Smith, Ed Smith
    Canada; Cardiff, Godtrey, Lannon, Lambert, Fell
    New Zealand; Laing, Fitz, Matthews, Pettergell, Slade

    I actually think if you picked the top 10 Aussie fighters for the decade, that they defeat the usa,