Would Manny Pacquiao at featherweight have beaten Prince Nasim Hamed?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mike_b, Sep 5, 2025.


  1. Mike_b

    Mike_b Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,909
    2,554
    Jul 9, 2020
    Exactly what the title says: I wish these two were around in the same era
     
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    244,717
    239,668
    Nov 23, 2013
  3. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,257
    5,873
    Oct 5, 2009
  4. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Active Member Full Member

    511
    960
    May 5, 2025
    He would've obliterated him. Naseem was amazing to watch and a true entertainer, but the only actual decent fighter he came up against, he lost pretty comfortably, and Pacquiao was better than Barrera. Kelley had him on the deck multiple times, so Pacquiao would've switched his lights out, pretty early as well.
     
  5. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    45,875
    13,700
    Mar 5, 2006
    Sounds weird but I gotta favor prince hamed. His movement would have bothered Manny.

    too bad fighters peak at different weights etc.
     
  6. d4n1elc

    d4n1elc New Member Full Member

    80
    58
    May 27, 2025
    PacMan in quick fashion
     
    Mike_b likes this.
  7. ipitythefool

    ipitythefool Prediction ? Pain Full Member

    6,706
    12,008
    Mar 17, 2017
  8. BoxingWarrior

    BoxingWarrior Member Full Member

    156
    148
    Jun 5, 2021
    In a hypothetical featherweight fight at their primes (Hamed circa 1997–2000, Pacquiao circa 2003), Manny Pacquiao would likely win by late stoppage (TKO in Rounds 10–12) or unanimous decision. His relentless punch volume, speed, and ability to recover from knockdowns would overwhelm Hamed, whose balance issues and lower output could be exploited.
     
    Smokin Bert likes this.
  9. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,254
    11,310
    Jan 6, 2007
    Pac would be heavily favoured here, probably by stoppage.
     
    Boxingfan2 likes this.
  10. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,393
    28,932
    Feb 25, 2015
    A lot of people dont realize this, but Featherweight was actually Manny Pacquiao's best weight.

    He would crush Hamed.
     
  11. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,424
    31,993
    Jan 14, 2022
    People in hindsight will pick Pacquiao but forget he was still raw at Featherweight and hadn't reached his prime and was still a bit one dimensional being left hand happy.

    Yes Pacquiao is a much greater P4P fighter but a more raw version of Pacquiao coming straight forward against one of the hardest hitting Featherweights of all time in Hamed is a dangerous tactic.
     
    Reinhardt, oldcanvasback and Mike_b like this.
  12. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,583
    687
    Aug 23, 2010
    Pacquiao would have sent Naseem to the shadow realm
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2025
  13. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,957
    12,418
    Jun 21, 2015
    Is this a trick question?
     
  14. KO_King

    KO_King Horizontal Heavyweight Full Member

    730
    1,573
    Apr 16, 2023
    I would pick Manny, but I do feel Naz is being really undersold here. He was prime in '95\'96 and, at his best, an awkward, unorthodox big-hitter with great reflexes and timing. He was definitely NOT prime in the Barerra fight, by that time overly reliant on punching power and had fallen out of love with training. He was very good at his best, it's just that his best didn't last long. By the end he was a bit of a car crash waiting to happen.
     
    Dorrian_Grey and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,112
    21,646
    Sep 15, 2009