The reality of Crawford's victory over Canelo explained in one minute

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MidniteProwler, Sep 23, 2025 at 4:34 PM.


  1. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,172
    28,505
    Sep 19, 2012
    Yes I picked Canelo and thought he would be too strong but it was evident from the first few rounds that he looked tired. Just like Mario Lopez said in the clip in my OP he thought tonight is the night Canelo gets old and I am saying that I agree with him.
     
    CooperKupp and Reinhardt like this.
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,027
    Jul 19, 2004
    Quickly on this point, I didn't necessarily mean the deck was stacked in an A-side privilege manner (although I think that is perhaps applicable here as well - after all, Crawford was never the darling of Vegas, Canelo was, even getting an unreasonably favorable card against Floyd, when Floyd won virtually every round). But I was more referring to the fact that Canelo was younger (even if he had more mileage), that he was the reigning undisputed king at 168 looking for his 10th title defense, and that most of his career was north of 147 whereas Bud only fought north of 147 once prior. Fighters jumping up two full weight classes are almost always inherently at a disadvantage. There is a reason that Canelo was the clear favorite going in, notwithstanding your predictive prowess that saw you best the oddsmakers on this one (and many other fights as well).

    I also generally disagree with your overall outlook about a fighter's ability to cut weight and rehydrate. You see it as "weight bullying", but that's not a real thing if a fighter makes the contractually obligated weight requirements. I see fighters with a greater ability to cut weight and rehydrate as an asset, no different than a fighter who has tremendous speed and reflexes, or another fighter who has devastating one-punch knockout power. Then there is always the flipside, that a fighter cutting too much weight could be detrimental to one's chances of success.

    A weight bully, in my eyes, is simply someone who FAILS to make weight, coming in over the contracted limit. I strongly (but respectfully) disagree with your entire line of reasoning on that one, but I know neither of us will change the other's mind, so we'll just have to continue to agree to disagree on that point.

    :thumbsup:
     
    Reinhardt, Pimp C and Serge like this.
  3. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,821
    16,871
    Jan 13, 2021
    Nah, you're just looking for an excuse because Crawford is better than you thought. I remember you mentioning Bud being 38 moving up 2 weight classes and looking poor against Madrimov when others told you that Canelo is on the decline

    if were being honest Canelo has been past it since 2022 which is why he looked the exact same against Charlo, Muguia and Ryder when he walked Crawford down, Stalking methodically but in educated matter, loading up on shots when he has them near the ropes, working the body and arms to break his opponents down. But unlike them Crawford neutralized Canelos jab and offense with his own lead hand and movement. This made Canelo look worse than he really was. Canelo is still elite
     
    Pimp C and Rumsfeld like this.
  4. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,172
    28,505
    Sep 19, 2012
    I think what Mario Lopez says in the video is valid and worthy of a thread. I posted it to show that an expert agrees with a lot of us on here. I feel the Berlanga fight showed Canelo declining even further than the 3 fights you mentioned. I am not looking for any excuses as I am no Canelo fan. I am agreeing with Mario Lopez's assessment of the fight. Do you think that Mario is looking for excuses?
     
    CooperKupp likes this.
  5. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,144
    9,874
    Aug 1, 2012
    Yes but how many of those fighters have the reach advantage Crawford had? How many fighters jumping up two full weight classes were P4P #1 or close to that? There's also a common thread between what SRL did and what Bud did. They didn't just move up multiple weight classes in a short period of time. They took their time, and they didn't take any tuneups. Charlo for example jumped up two weight classes pretty quickly. With Bud he had been planning this for years, and it took time for him to move up in weight safely, to retain his speed.
    I understand Serge's point, and to Serge's credit, he was one of the few who saw that Crawford wasn't as undersized as many thought he was. So what happened didn't seem to surprise Serge because he talked about how big Crawford was for a while. That said, I also agree with your point to an extent that if you make the weight that's that. Stylistically this version of Canelo is sort of tailor made for Crawford in a way, in that Crawford has the skillset and the range to get in and out without allowing Canelo to set and load up with big shots. Long reaches are always going to give Canelo fits because if you can pepper Canelo from the outside without allowing Canelo to get inside on you, then you don't allow Canelo to impose his will with his heavy hands, and he can be outboxed. We've seen it before, we've seen it in spurts even in fights he won. I would be interested to see if a rematch comes about, if a more motivated Canelo after having been in with Crawford would do better. Canelo really needs to find ways to get inside on Crawford, trap him on the ropes, and unload on him. It's easier said than done but Canelo is a very talented fight, and I think he learned a lot about Crawford and how to attack that style after being in with him. Maybe he wasn't as well prepared as he thought he was. But you learn a lot from a match like that.
     
    Rumsfeld and Serge like this.
  6. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,821
    16,871
    Jan 13, 2021
    Considering he says Canelo just got old overnight, yes. Canelo dominated Berlanga and he is way bigger than Crawford. Canelo is unbeaten at 168, undisputed with a good resume, so the win is still elite. Usyks overall resume is better than Crawfords but don't play the double standards. Fury was the same age as Canelo, has a far worse resume, cherrypicked even more and scraped by a 37 year old mma fighter with no professional boxing experience getting dropped in the process right before he fought Usyk
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  7. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,289
    131,608
    Jul 21, 2009
    Yeah I get that but despite the weight jump I never saw it as a fight between two fighters of vastly different size.

    For example, Haney came up from 135 and Rougarou was a career 140 pounder. The narrative we were supposed to believe was that Haney was the smaller guy who was daring to be great by going up to 140 to challenge the bigger Rougarou but that simply wasn't the actually realty at all nor even close. Haney had a 9lb weight advantage in the ring and was and is the bigger guy

    I'm not saying this was the case with Clenelo and Crawford but if Clenelo did have a weight advantage it would not have been much at all and, as said, Crawford's reach would've been a much bigger factor and it was a very stylistically favourable match up for him vs a Clenelo who has a lot more miles on his clock, has clearly declined a lot IMO, and just wasn't the force or threat he used to be.

    Loma might not have been jumping up more than one weight class at a time but he was giving away way more weight at 135 (and even at 126 and 130 sometimes) than Crawford ever has at any weight. And whilst simultaneously giving away huge amounts of reach too. But we're supposed to believe Crawford vs Clenelo was David vs Goliath because Crawford jumped up 2 divisions to fight someone close to his size. I don't see it that way.

    Loma routinely giving away 10-15lbs and often as much as almost 6'' in reach, and 20lbs vs Haney, is actually David vs Goliath

    Usyk at HW is David vs Goliath

    Floyd and Manny were very often fighting bigger or much bigger men when they moved up in weight

    Whereas, conversely, Crawford hasn't been doing that at all

    He weighed more at 135 vs Beltran than career 140 Postol weighed vs him at 140

    More at 140 vs Postol than career 147 Horn weighed vs him at 147

    And he weighed more for his 154 debut than career 154 Madrimov weighed vs him

    Crawford in his 4th weight class weighed more, albeit only a pound and a bit, than his career opponent at that weight did

    This is what I mean about weight bullying. We have weight classes for a reason and weight bullying makes a mockery of that.

    Multi-weight champs who actually are fighting opponents bigger, much or way bigger than them when they move up in weight and who actually are having to overcome physical disadvantages or big or huge ones >>> multi-weight champs who are often much or bigger than their opponents when they ascend through the weights or at worst are roughly the same size as them

    Just like road warriors fighting on a deck stacked against them >> have gloves won't travel warriors fighting on a deck stacked in their favour

    As said, it was an excellent win for Crawford and he's a great fighter he actually did better late in the fight than I first realized because I was posting or reading the RBR at the time too. He really didn't do much in many of the earlier rounds, neither did, and I wasn't impressed by the fight during those rounds :thumbsup:
     
  8. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,172
    28,505
    Sep 19, 2012
    I could say you are making excuses for why Fury lost to Usyk. Fury was the betting favorite in the first fight. We all know it is more common for heavyweights to come in out of shape as there is not weight limit so no need to cut weight also heavyweights age better and you know this. Fury looked like he didn't even train for the Ngannou fight.
    Fury came out firing in the first fight with Usyk whereas Canelo came out plodding against Crawford.
    Usyk becoming undisputed at heavyweight is more impressive than Crawford's whole career.
     
    Banana-Rama and CooperKupp like this.
  9. OldSchoolBoxing

    OldSchoolBoxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,835
    3,253
    Sep 30, 2021
    Canelo looked reluctant in both Skull and Crawford fights. It seems he doesn't want to be there anymore.

    He has tons of money, why keep training in the gym instead of spending his millions?
     
    pacas and Rumsfeld like this.
  10. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,821
    16,871
    Jan 13, 2021
    Came out plodding ? You mean Canelo fought like Canelo ? He's been flatfooted his whole career including all his high profile wins so that's just cope.

    The asterisks with Fury are far worse not to mention Canelo is far greater than Fury. Fury's best win was 9 years prior and Canelo never retired for 2 years ballooning up in weight. Fury was already past his prime in his comeback. Fact. Struggling with Scull doesn't come close to struggling with Ngannou. It's not comparable. Heavyweights aging better is only marginally true, there isn't even a strong correlation between size and longevity in boxing. People are claiming aj is shot at 35 lmao
     
    pacas and Pimp C like this.
  11. deadACE

    deadACE Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    1,012
    Apr 13, 2014
    Canelo looking old and tired in a fight where his opponent made him work hard to land anything of significance is actually downplaying Crawfords tactics and ability to make Canelo miss.

    Canelo never had an amazing gastank ever and still won his fights against Berlanga, Scull....not bad for a tired old man lol.
     
    pacas, Pimp C and Rumsfeld like this.
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,027
    Jul 19, 2004
    Now this is the REAL reality of Crawford's victory over Canelo, in under 60 words.
     
    pacas, Pimp C and deadACE like this.
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,477
    21,884
    Sep 15, 2009
    The more I think about this victory, the more I am convinced he's worthy of his p4p number 1 spot.

    In the immediate aftermath I went with Usyk, but actually thats just because I feel Usyk is a greater fighter overall, not because of what Usyk has actually done lately.

    This victory is worthy of a top spot. I was one of the few on here who predicted Crawford would good enough to overcome the size disparity, whilst also recognising who stacked the deck was in favour of Canelo.

    The only thing you can say negative about Crawford's career is he scraped by Madrimov during his LMW pit stop

    Crawford is a worthy p4p number 1, and ironically for all the reasons the TS has given before the fight.
     
    pacas and Pimp C like this.
  14. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,729
    6,127
    May 2, 2015
    Pretty ironic that the fight mentioned in the video (GGG/Canelo I which was 8 years ago, not 9 or 10) took place less than a month after Crawford had become the first undisputed champion in over a decade and 2 years after he became the lineal champion in his 2nd weight class.

    Yes, Canelo had more wear and tear. Especially those first 24 rounds with GGG, they'd take a toll on anyone. But It's still a fact that he was the undisputed champion 2 divisions north, was coming off of a win over an undefeated titlist, as mediocre as the titlist was, and had only been beaten by the very best in different weight classes before. He lost because his opponent was the better fighter, no amount of spinning and coping will change that.

    I do like p4p rankings, It's fun and educational to debate fighters accomplishments and levels at different weight classes. But that's just it, It's a list made for fun and promotional purposes. All this obsession and hissy fit over one guy being 1 place higher than the other makes no sense.
     
    Pimp C and Rumsfeld like this.
  15. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,729
    6,127
    May 2, 2015
    I still remeber the 30 days weigh ins for GGG/Brook, where Brook was 176lbs to Golovkin's 164 and looked like he wouldn't be at a disadvantage, we saw how that turned out.

    Same thing with Canelo/Charlo, who's younger and bigger than Crawford. Charlo looked in damn good shape at the weigh ins, maybe even better than Canelo yet it didn't help him being completely outclassed, overpowered and looking utterly out of his depth.

    Brook and Charlo lost to GGG and Canelo respectively because they were the inferior fighters, which was exactly the case with Nelo himself against Crawford.
     
    Pimp C and Rumsfeld like this.