Do you consider Fury toying with 10 year unbeaten Klitschko one of the best achievements in boxing ?

Belly, who it's hardly a secret is notorious for suffering from discipline issues and fighting down to the level of his opposition, had one bad performance in the previous 4 years, had knocked out of stopped 4 of his last 5 opponents, all of whom with the exception of one round, in completely one-sided dominant fashion. That run of form, Ngannou aside, is probably Belly's best run of form and certainly arguably so if not, not his worst run of form like Clenelo's was

Clenelo who does not and never has suffered from discipline issues and is always in top shape, literally hadn't stopped anyone in four years despite cherrypicking all throughout that time and many of those fighters he failed to stop have subsequently knocked out or stopped by fighters far from elite. Complete featherfists, 160 pounders making their 168 debut, and padded record C levels. That's a clear pattern over a four year period not one bad night at the office after taking an opponent lightly

And the one-dimensional Clenelo was a very favourable stylistic match up for Crawford and Crawford even admits such himself

Belly was not a very favourable stylistic match up for Usyk at all. Not only is Belly a highly skilled versatile boxer and way bigger than him but those enormous physical advantages he holds over him made it a far more difficult, risky and dangerous assignment for Usyk

And if you disagree then we can just refer to Crawford yet again because he himself believes size disadvantages are a big obstacle to overcome, let alone the obscene size disadvantages Usyk had to overcome vs Belly

This content is protected

"My thing is Benavidez is a big dude. Not to say I won't fight him (no you absolutely won't lol). I fought his brother and his brother was big when I fought him.

The only reason why I entertain Clenelo is because he's not a big dude. He might be thick but he's not a big dude. Benavidez is like 6'2'' and then he gonna come it at 190 . 200, probably. That's a big dude.''

Do I need to translate what he's actually saying here?

''You just size them up. Size them up. Especially when you go into a bigger weight class. You size them up and see your advantages''

“He got a little wider frame, but he’s a little shorter. But all in all, we’re around the same size. So, by y’all saying, ‘Oh, Canelo’s this massive size,' it was disrespect. Then, when y’all seen me weigh in, then y’all say, ‘Oh, well, they about the same.' It’s not a big difference.''

 

The only place he was COMFORTABLY ahead was the corrupt as hell scorecard of the paid off Canelo judges and the delusional fanboys of Canelo, like you. Any reasonable scorer had Saunders up. The biased DAZN scorer Chris Mannix had Saunders up. Even usually the A-side loving scorers on Boxrec had it dead even. And yes, it was a freak accident, plenty of fighters get hit with uppercuts, they rarely result in a broken eye socket. Sanders was probably more responsible for that than Canelo, because he leaned into it. But... but... but... that was his plan all along! Yeah... no it wasn't. If you argue otherwise, then what are you saying? Fighters who kill their opponents intended to? **** off with all of this nonsense.