Ezzard Charles vs Bernard Hopkins

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Oct 15, 2025.


Who wins and how

  1. Hopkins KO/TKO

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Charles KO/TKO

    20.0%
  3. Hopkins Decision

    6.7%
  4. Charles Decision

    73.3%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,440
    11,864
    Sep 21, 2017
    This content is protected


    The video man picks Charles to win. Who do you pick to win?
     
    Devon and Journeyman92 like this.
  2. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,153
    7,006
    Sep 8, 2013
    Charles all the way. Bernard is pretty cagey, so, he likely lasts the distance.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,122
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007
    Charles and Hopkins match up fine for size. Charles is the only man of Hopkins's size I would pick to get him out of there.
     
  4. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,893
    36,692
    Jan 8, 2017
    Charles wins by decision
    Possible close fight,8 rounds to 4 .
     
  5. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    6,531
    Jan 22, 2009
    Bernard was not a great 175 pounder. Ez was. Bhop stands no chance at 175 but might last the distance.
     
  6. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,486
    8,022
    Dec 21, 2016
    I think Charles would be the hardest, smartest and most powerful fighter he would have faced, I don't think he gets away with a spoiler contest, he might last it out, though I think he'd meet with a tko or ko.

    Bhop to me, is one of Boxing's 'jammy' champions, in a purist's world he might not see the title.

    as always, who knows.

    But not with Charles is he having fun.
     
  7. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,645
    21,609
    Sep 22, 2021
    Ezzard Charles might be the P4P best of all time, Charles has already beaten guys a lot better then Hopkins, Charles turns him and basically any 175lber since the 90s onwards into a punching bag.
     
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,440
    11,864
    Sep 21, 2017
    Who are the guys "a lot better than Hopkins'?
     
  9. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,645
    21,609
    Sep 22, 2021
    Walcott, Moore, Burley, Bivins etc…
     
  10. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,802
    4,551
    Jul 14, 2009
  11. slash

    slash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,680
    2,935
    Apr 15, 2012
    That's it. Exactly what I was going to post.
     
  12. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,571
    5,775
    Dec 31, 2018
    At 160lbs, Hopkins.

    At 168lbs or 175lbs, Charles.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  13. Ike

    Ike Member Full Member

    448
    687
    Feb 20, 2025
    I'm going for Charles by decision after a close fight. Hopkins's ability to control the distance, his obstructive style and his ring IQ would have made life difficult for any of the best middleweight and light heavyweight boxers of all time. But Charles was a true phenomenon and would have beaten the Executioner, even if he suffered.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.