Fabio Wardley’s Last 4 Results Paint a Far-Better Picture of Him Than The Fighter He Actually Is

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Franko_Haggis, Oct 25, 2025 at 4:45 PM.


  1. Franko_Haggis

    Franko_Haggis New Member Full Member

    19
    16
    Sep 10, 2025
    DISCLAIMER - this will rub some people up the wrong way and will probably come across as needlessly reactionary, but try and stay light hearted, and I’m 100% up for friendly debate.

    Fabio lost the first Clarke fight IMO (albeit it being a fairly close fight). He got away with a draw.

    Fabio then beats Clarke in the rematch after spinning Clarke around into the ropes and throwing shots before the ref should’ve stepped in to reset the action which started the knockout sequence.

    Fabio then gets his arse handed to him for 9 rounds against Huni (who isn’t even a top 10 heavyweight), before he lands a good shot that puts Huni down; and the broadcast conveniently switches away from the action as Huni is being counted out so we can’t assess whether Huni was counted quickly, or what his condition looked like as he was getting up.

    Fabio then gets a dodgy stoppage in the 11th round whilst he was anywhere between 9-1 and 7-3 down against #2 ranked Joseph Parker.

    To give Fabio his due credit, he is 100% an overachiever, and is obviously an incredibly tough man. He also seems to be a genuinely nice lad. But there is an issue with each of his recent wins, and the fact that this white collar fighter is now going to get in the ring with Usyk is such a bad look on boxing.
     
    oldcanvasback likes this.
  2. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Active Member Full Member

    684
    1,286
    May 5, 2025
    I don't think Wardley is any worse than Wilder, technically speaking; he's actually more likable and more marketable, too. Wilder had no jab, couldn't fight on the back foot, and people thought he was the second coming of Foreman. Wilder might've won a medal as an amateur, but he was just as crude and just as bereft of technique at the elite level as Wardley is. It does showcase how poor the HW division is, except for Usyk.
     
    oldcanvasback likes this.
  3. Aburius

    Aburius Suspected Zurdo sympathiser Full Member

    4,328
    3,293
    Nov 24, 2017
    Well, I would give Wardley a 5% chance against Usyk, at best, assuming Usyk doesn't age overnight, so yeah, you are probably right. However, at least he won't be a guy pathetically trying to beat him at his own game, which can never work.

    A complete physical freak, doing things which are basically unprecedented, at least adds an element of chance to proceedings. He certainly won't persuade himself, as Fury, and especially Joshua, did, that they were winning the technical scoring battle early doors. He will be looking for destruction from the first minute to the last minute, which means you couldn't entirely rule it out.
     
  4. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,753
    32,995
    Jan 14, 2022
    I thought Wardley clearly beat Clarke by atleast 2 or 4 points he was by the more active fighter and landed considerably more punches.

    Wardley was not 9-1 down to Parker come off it most in the RBR had it 6-4 and Wardley was coming off his best round of the fight.

    Wardley is not an overly skillful boxer no but he's a warrior who doesn't give up. And he has the power to turn a fight around at any moment which makes him a live threat to most Heavyweights not named Usyk.

    I don't see how it's a bad look for boxing for someone who didn't have an amateur background who's found success from hard work and determination winning tough fights to make a name for himself.

    Good luck to him I don't see what's so wrong about that TBH.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2025 at 8:32 PM
  5. DaRealJT

    DaRealJT Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,447
    6,250
    Sep 26, 2021
    True. And can also say the exact same about Joseph Parker.
     
  6. oldcanvasback

    oldcanvasback Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    1,229
    Jan 26, 2018
    I think Wardley looks a better boxer than Wilder already. I think Parker is a bigger scalp than Ortiz too.
     
    Brighton bomber likes this.
  7. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,323
    29,532
    Apr 4, 2005
    You might be right. I was thinking it during the fight, that he had improved since the Huni fight, not by much but his jab and defence were better last night than against Huni and with this win albeit with some controversy he has a better win than any Wilder win already.

    For all his flaws Wardley makes up for them with an iron chin, unwavering self-belief and KO power. He kind of reminds me of Froch, not in style but how despite clear technical flaws he is able to overcome his limitations via will, durability and power. Just like Froch you can't ever right him off.
     
    oldcanvasback and kostya by ko like this.
  8. kostya by ko

    kostya by ko Boxing Addict

    5,620
    4,439
    Feb 18, 2005
    He's taken 2 tough fights in 2025 ... so at least any assessment is on current form based on actual performances.

    So many assessments of current HWs are either based on the distant past or hypothetical speculation.

    Going for him additionally, is he will (like Parker) probably take on a challenge as soon as an opportunity arises, rather than duck and weave outside of the ring.
     
    oldcanvasback likes this.
  9. Boxing Gloves

    Boxing Gloves Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,533
    1,614
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wardley for me is the new version of Wilder.
    He's quick, awkward, explosive, huge power but not the best technically.