Tyson Fury > Wlad Klitschko

He refused the rematch because he was not confident he could do it again so he ran and lied like a coward. Just like his sprained ankle he claimed to stall the rematch just to be seen dancing at a club on the said injury.
He

 

are you that stupid by your rules Fury not rematching Wladamir must be a huge ding on his resume then? But you already claimed the opposite that rematches dont matter in this same thread. so you are a joke and a clown.

 

no they weren't he even fought Povetkin in Moscow as well as several title fight in America.

 

his batshitcrazy wife had just given birth and wanted to off herself?

"Again" Love the imaginary myth that Furystans try to push that he boxed some masterclass instead of winning a boring, nothingburger of a fight.

Fury was amazing at beating Chisora every Tuesday, I am sure it added greatly to his legacy

 

The Peter fight? He came back from getting knocked down 3 times? Wlad won 19 fights in a row after that and 22 in a row after the Brewster loss. But somehow less forgiveable then the Ngannou fight.

"But Wlad losing to a green Joshua who hadn't been past 7 rounds or had more than one real fight was pathetic."

Joshua was an 18-0 alphabet* champ with an 100% KO rate. He was 15 years younger then Wlad. And Wlad got a knockdown and made a spirited comeback. I don't get looking at that fight and thinking AJs got a chance against 35 year old Wlad.

 

The examples you cite of Wlad fights not happening are all rematches. And Fury did his level best NOT to fight Usyk, even though he eventually caved in. Beyond those losses, Wlad, and fighting the same guy three times (in admittedly exciting fights) his resume is pretty bare. The rest of the stuff you bring in are things I never mentioned (eg the greatness of Vitali and Bowe).
Listen, I said I find your take interesting. It's not without merit, even though I don't completely agree. Wlad fought a lot of poor opposition, and his in-ring tactics were pretty shameful a lot of the time. I genuinely think he is hugely overrated as an ATG. I just think Fury did not do enough in his own career to prove he was better, in a historical sense, even though I think he was capable of it.

 

Absolutely embarrassing, revoke this mans boxing fan license immediately.

 

Add to that, Wlad was fighting near prime Joshua at 41 (I think), and was doing pretty well in there.

If Fury is so great, why isn't he taking on Agit Kabayel, Dubois, even Joshua, at 37, to earn another shot at Usyk?

 

And yet, Fury still "got depressed" when he needed to rematch a guy who he soundly beaten, lol. Duck, duck, duck. He knew he caught Wlad at the right time, and that really, he couldn't even lace his gloves. He proved it by being shyte of the champion.

 

While I think prime for prime Fury always beats him, he's nowhere near Wlad in terms of overall greatness. Way less depth to his resume, nowhere near as long and dominant a reign, missed out on way too many names in his era.

 

Make every excuse for Fury not rematching long reigning champion Wlad but then criticises wlad for not rematching Sanders.

Standard phallus hopping from Neet

 

The idiot does not even know that Brock was undefeated and ranked in the top ten when Wlad beat him, and had to retire due to an eye injury soon after.