Tyson Fury > Wlad Klitschko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Redbeard7, Oct 24, 2025 at 3:47 PM.


  1. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,160
    28,001
    Jul 26, 2004
    39 year old Wlad > prime Haye
    (gifting the notion that 39 year old one fight away from being kod into retirement Wlad is better than a prime Haye and that Haye wouldn't have beaten this version too)

    Wilder < Povetkin
    Chisora = Byrd (gifting this one too)
    Wallin < Peter
    Ngannou < Pulev
    Shot Whyte < Chagaev
    Cunningham < Ibragimov
    Johnson < Brock
    UD'ing 33 yo Pianeta < KO6 28 yo Pianeta
    Hammer < Thompson
    Seferi < Mccline

    Fury opponents edged 2 out of 11.

    Is there any combination of these names where Furys list edges out Wlads?
    I dont see it.
     
  2. Redbeard7

    Redbeard7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,418
    2,493
    Oct 9, 2022
    39 Wlad (UD away) Germany and Wilder 2 (TKO7 away) are better wins than any on Wlad's record. Wlad was never winning fighter of the year by backhumping Povetkin for 12 rounds.

    I'd argue that Fury at his best was better than Wlad at his best and a harder man to beat, especially without A-side advantage. Wlad was much more consistent and disciplined than Fury but not as good. Fury's had sh*t fights, going life and death with lesser opponents but he always found a way to survive and do just enough. I also find it disgusting when a "great fighter" snatches defeat from the jaws of victory and then says "I won by losing". But these things are subjective.

    My argument isn't based on a list of decent opponents beaten, otherwise Wlad would be universally regarded as far superior to Vitali but this isn't the case, to put it mildly.

    Wins:

    Byrd 1 (UD12)
    McCline (RTD10)
    Williamson (STD5)
    Peter 1 (UD12)
    Brock (TKO7)
    Ibragimov (UD12)
    Thompson 1 (KO11)
    Chagaev (RTD9)
    Chambers (KO12)
    Haye (UD12)
    Povetkin (UD12)
    Pulev (KO5)
    Jennings (UD12)

    Losses:

    Puritty (TKO11)
    Sanders (TKO2)
    Brewster 1 (TKO5)
    Fury (UD12)
    Joshua (TKO11)

    13-5

    It's very questionable whether Wlad would've beaten Williamson, Peter 1 or Povetkin without help from the referees, any of the three could have been another stoppage loss.
     
  3. Redbeard7

    Redbeard7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,418
    2,493
    Oct 9, 2022
    This content is protected


    Being in top condition with Emanuel Steward in your corner, getting knocked down three times by Peter and grappling almost as much as he did in the Povetkin fight to a 114-111 decision isn't the stuff of greatness.

    18-0 isn't many pro fights, especially when your best opponent by a clear margin is a similarly green Whyte. Wlad had been the full 12 rounds on 8 occasions, Joshua hadn't been past the 7th once. Wlad had been a big event fighter arguably since the 1990's. Joshua was new to this, certainly to an event of that magnitude. When the green fighter starts gassing badly after 5 rounds and gets dropped in the 6th by the vastly more experienced "great", the great is supposed to close the show (as Ruiz and Dubois did), not choke for 5 rounds and get stopped.

    Joshua would have a puncher's chance against 35 year old Wlad, though I'd favour Wlad. But the problem with alternative reality hypotheticals is we know Wlad got TKO'd by a green Joshua in actual reality. Perhaps if Joshua had been less green, he'd have won more easily or beaten better versions of Wlad etc. In any case, it turned out to be a significant stain on his record. Any version of Wlad may have an opponent for the taking and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory because he was overcautious by temperament, even when he had every reason not to be (Joshua badly hurt, demoralised and gassed, possibility that Joshua could recover and stop him, probability of an A-side robbery in London).
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  4. Redbeard7

    Redbeard7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,418
    2,493
    Oct 9, 2022
    "Wlad's Hollywood tart of a wife was feeling sad, that's why he lost"

    This is a "grown man" writing, apparently. If Wlad asked you to top him off you'd drop to your knees.

    "instead of winning a boring, nothingburger of a fight."

    It's more entertaining than the majority of Wlad's defences, many of which were hybrid box-wrestling matches.
     
  5. Redbeard7

    Redbeard7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,418
    2,493
    Oct 9, 2022
    On title defence stats or "top 10 opponents fought/beaten", Wlad is going to automatically register as one of the few greatest HW champions ever. My feelings and beliefs here go beyond how many contenders Wlad beat on paper.

    I don't think he's as good as Fury, just as many if not most think Wlad isn't as good as Vitali or Bowe. I think Fury showed a higher level at his best (Chisora 2, Wlad, Wilder 2) and was less beatable (at least when he took fights seriously), hence he never had a Puritty/Sanders/Brewster fight, despite often being out of shape, overconfident and unmotivated, and he didn't require the same level of A-side bias (or any) to make his style work.

    I was disgusted by Wlad's loss to a green Joshua: Joshua being badly hurt, gassed, demoralised, just been dropped hard in round 6, Wlad chokes for 5 rounds and gets stopped, despite the risk of Joshua recovering to stop him or a London robbery. Ruiz and Dubois then do what he couldn't.
     
  6. peter_uk

    peter_uk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,278
    3,724
    Sep 11, 2022
    Wlad first won a world title in 2000, and from then until the end of his career he fought 33 times, and in each fight he either defended a title or fought at world level. Fury first won a world title against Wlad in late 2015; from therein he had twelve fights, three of which were against certifiable no-hopers, one was against British level Chisora who he had already beaten twice, one was against a boxing novice (which he could (should?) have lost to. During that period Fury's only creditable wins are against Wallin, Whyte and Wilder. It turns out by consistently fighting world level opposition, one runs the risk of coming unstuck; if Fury fought Wlad's opposition from after the Brewster defeat, all the way up to Fury himself, then I'm sure Fury would have one or more losses.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and kostya by ko like this.
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,117
    81,602
    Aug 21, 2012
    i bet that mental image got you excited
     
  8. OldSchoolBoxing

    OldSchoolBoxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,899
    3,328
    Sep 30, 2021
    lol
     
  9. Salty Dog

    Salty Dog globalize the Buc-ees revolution Full Member

    10,445
    6,112
    Sep 5, 2008
    there's an argument here, granted. i just stopped in to say both are amusingly overrated. like neither was actually very good relative to the company some wish them to be included in. lummoxes...did i say that right? lummox? with chins as questionable as their stamina.
     
  10. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,939
    4,295
    Jan 6, 2024
    The point was to retort the talking point that Fury always won or didn't lose his embarassing epiodes when Wlad lost.
     
  11. Joeywill

    Joeywill Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,569
    2,454
    Aug 2, 2021
    Fury didnt do enough

    He had the potential to be greater than Wlad but he chose drugs
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  12. OddR

    OddR Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,013
    2,153
    Jan 8, 2025
    Well to be fair Peter fought fairly rough too he hit Wlad at the back of the head quite a few times which was resulted in the sequence to some of the knockdowns.

    But it would have looked better Wlad not being down sure.
     
  13. Csonnyliston

    Csonnyliston Sam Langford P4P GOAT Full Member

    309
    483
    Feb 25, 2020
  14. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,117
    81,602
    Aug 21, 2012
    When you put it like that the difference in class is enormous.
     
    kirk likes this.
  15. CooperKupp

    CooperKupp “B.. but they all playin NBA basketball again!” Full Member

    2,280
    4,854
    Aug 28, 2022
    As far as total career body of work… it’s debatable imo. He didn’t have a solid 10 defenses of the WBC belt. But from a H2H standpoint… I absolutely think peak Vitali is an ATG. He’d be a serious problem for anyone.