Not always, but usually. And pardon me, but it's not really what you know Ajagba is capable of - it's what you think/believe... Without the evidence, there is no "know", only hunches, gut feelings and speculations.
I see with my own eyes Ajagbas tools and he has good ameture experience, you said the exact same thing about Wardley until he beat Parker, that he was "unproven" and that Parker is "levels above" which is why you favored Parker lol. He's good enough to be a top 10 contender
It's all speculation, at best, until it's proven. The eye test is only as good as the level it's been proven at. Amateur pedigree is often a crapshoot - some storied amateurs make great pros, and some make relative nobodies.
It's called foresight. In the end the top 10 constantly changes it isn’t a set level. Wardley was always world class even before the Parker fight
I agree, the division is packed with similar level fighters ,bunch of C+, B -- types. Fortunately I believe Fury belly has unofficially hung' em up so we'll miss out on another Fury Wilder fight,,,lol!
In terms of rounds it would likely be competitive as Big Fabio and Ajagba can both be outboxed by slick technical movers but head to head it would likely be a good competitive high-octane scrap whilst it lasted but once Big Fabio completely cracks that chin that the Georgian Cruiserweight journeyman semi-cracked then it's game over. Ajagba is a born specimen Wardley is a born fighter.