Would this fight be a two sided, grueling battle, between legends? Or a one sided beat down, along the lines of Dempsey v Willard? Was Greb,a blown up middle, good enough to beat one of the most ferocious fighters of the early 1900s ?
Two made up fantasy characters we know little about in all honesty? Whatever you want man ... try doing it without relying on sycophantic fantasy writers. That would be something actually impressive
I do not see an attempt to explain either without relying on authors we know spread lies for profit. A hundred wolves and ten sheep can have a consensus on what they should eat, and you can choose to agree or disagree but if a man asks what do the vegetarians say a man should not expect to be told themselves
Dempsey tans his hide unmerciful. This content is protected You can see above the old age stance he fought out of.
Would have been stopped before the double digit rounds. Dempseys reach was only 2 inches longer but he was also used to knocking fighters out with a disadvantage.
All I can say is that Greb was much keener on the fight than Dempsey was. And that when they sparred it was Greb dishing out the smackdown, to the extent that he was chased out of camp. I am not necessarily saying Greb 'would' win, but the evidence is that he'd be a very live dog.
