Gerry Cooney vs Bonecrusher Smith

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Saintpat, Nov 21, 2025.


Who wins and how?

  1. Cooney decision

    2 vote(s)
    10.0%
  2. Cooney KO

    10 vote(s)
    50.0%
  3. Bonecrusher decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Bonecrusher KO

    8 vote(s)
    40.0%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,237
    20,843
    Jul 30, 2014
    On paper, Smith has the better record, but based on the eye test, Cooney showed me more in his performances against Young (his career best performance) and Holmes, than Bonecrusher ever did in his career. Bonecrusher did far worse against a noticeably declining Holmes.
     
  2. newurban99

    newurban99 Active Member Full Member

    1,299
    2,035
    Apr 24, 2010
    Gerry Cooney at age 69 has a good life. He lives in a beautiful house in Scotch Plains, a tranquil town in central New Jersey. He has talked about belonging to Shackamaxon, a rich man's private golf country club. He also has talked about his great love for his wife. He's been sober and clean for many years. I'd say life has treated Gerry very well, thanks largely to the big payday he got fighting Holmes. I think his managers were a pain in the ass for promoters but they did well by Cooney.
     
    Saintpat and Brian1980 like this.
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,648
    9,715
    Jul 15, 2008
    The debate really isn’t that complicated. Eddie Lopez was a club fighter. The ST Gordon fight speaks for itself — Gordon was an eight-fight cruiserweight who tired quickly. Norton was selected because historically he struggled with punchers, and he didn’t have a meaningful win against one. And the comparison to a young Norton against a light-punching Ali doesn’t really apply here. Norton was 38 when he faced Cooney, and the style dynamics were entirely different. Lyle before him was around forty. Those were the types of opponents he was matched with.

    The facts are straightforward: Cooney was promoted more as a marketable attraction than developed as a complete fighter. He logged less than four minutes of ring time in the twenty-four months leading into the Holmes fight. That lack of activity is simply part of the record.

    Regarding his management, they certainly accomplished their goal if it was to maximize his earnings while minimizing risk. But that approach didn’t necessarily serve his long-term development in the ring. They were focused on protecting a valuable asset, and naturally, they benefited financially from that strategy. The downside is that Cooney entered the Holmes fight without the activity, seasoning, or range of opponents he needed. His career was shaped around opportunity rather than progression, and it showed when he finally stepped in with an all-time great.

    As for the claims about drugs or alcohol, most of that is pure speculation. The more documented issues surfaced after the Holmes loss, when he fell into a period of depression and struggled with substance abuse. There’s very little verified evidence that those problems were affecting him during the buildup to the Holmes fight.
     
    USFBulls727 likes this.
  4. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,743
    27,391
    Jun 26, 2009
    If you dismiss the possibility that his fight cancelations (leading to that inactivity) were due to reasons they were trying to keep out of the public eye (which were absolutely a reality later, and you can do some research and find usually people don’t start drinking alcoholically overnight) … then you’re left with inactivity due to injury as claimed at the time.

    And if they were trying to protect him completely, does signing to fight Mike Weaver fit your thesis? To me that doesn’t look like a move to keep someone protected. (Shavers either, for that matter — older and had holes in his game but still very obviously dangerous.)
     
    USFBulls727 likes this.
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,648
    9,715
    Jul 15, 2008
    I don't even understand your point. What are you trying to say , in a sentence ..
     
  6. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,743
    27,391
    Jun 26, 2009
    There are a few:

    1. You say his management kept him overly protected and were 100% risk-averse. I ask are you dismissing that he signed to fight Weaver or do you consider Weaver to be a no-risk or low-risk opponent?

    2. You point out his low degree of activity going into the Holmes fight (citing number of rounds in a period of time). I pointed out that he had multiple fights canceled and posited that it might have been due to alcohol/drugs given his later issues (and not years and years later). You dismiss that. I point out that the stated reason for the cancelations was injury in training. My question: Are you saying it would have been better management to put him in the ring injured/unable to train due to injury?
     
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,648
    9,715
    Jul 15, 2008
    I’ve always felt that if Cooney had truly been injured—and not just “conveniently” pulled from tune-ups—and if his management had been genuinely focused on developing him into the best fighter possible, they would have matched him more competitively in the lead-up to Holmes.

    Even with the cancellations, he still fought twice in those 24 months, but the opponents were hand-picked pushovers. That supports the idea that his team chose the most risk-averse path they could. The result was a very talented fighter with a fragile psyche being thrown into a massive, global event without the proper foundation. He took a loss in front of the world and never psychologically recovered.
     
  8. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,743
    27,391
    Jun 26, 2009
    You seem determined to completely ignore that he signed to fight Mike Weaver after Norton, before Holmes.

    So:

    1) Is that not exactly the kind of step up in competition that you say his management was unwilling to take?

    2) Wouldn’t that be the biggest stage he could get short of fighting Holmes? A fight for a world belt when he’s already a media magnate (not as big as young Mike Tyson would later be, but pretty similar with Sports Illustrated covers and national TV every time he sneezed, to the point that they’d lasso him into interviews and commentary if he was in the building) is a big deal. And he did main event in Madison Square Garden on some big shows so he wasn’t fighting ‘off Broadway’ in an armory in Topeka all the time, lol.

    Also, you are saying that his management was deliberately signing fights they had no intention of following through with, of which there is far less evidence than my suggestion that maybe he had drinking/drug problems. (In the latter case, we know that he DID disclose that he was struggling with addiction in a period just a couple years after this).

    Not sure if you know how drug addiction and alcoholism works, but a perfectly fine person doesn’t have a career setback and wake up the next day craving drugs and alcohol — it’s progressive and develops over time so the idea that he lost to Larry and within weeks or months he was a full-blown alcoholic/addict doesn’t hold water.
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,648
    9,715
    Jul 15, 2008
    Dude this is boring. I’m dealing in facts, not alternate scenarios. If you want to keep debating hypotheticals, that’s on you, but it doesn’t change what actually happened. I’ve already laid out the verified points clearly. You want to keep going to keep going in circles, knock yourself out.
     
  10. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,743
    27,391
    Jun 26, 2009
    Cooney vs Weaver was signed. It’s not a hypothetical.

    https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/25/sports/weaver-appears-about-to-lose-title.html#

    You want to dismiss actual fact — Cooney’s management was not only willing to have him fight Weaver, but signed him to do so — to hang on to your narrative that they weren’t wiling to put him in more challenging fights.

    You also hold onto your made-up ‘truth’ that Cooney’s management signed for other fights with the intention of pulling him out rather than accept more plausible scenarios (injury, as claimed, or perhaps drug/alcohol problems, which I suspect).
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,478
    25,989
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agree. And Smith lost quite a few fights in his prime to guys I’d favor Cooney against, Marvis Frazier, Adilson Rodriguez, and possibly even Tony Tubbs. I’ve heard claims that the Rodrigues fight might have been a hometown robbery but I don’t know.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    27,166
    18,170
    Apr 3, 2012
    Bonecrusher put away Weaver and Witherspoon early, and Bruno late. He went the distance with Tyson.

    Cooney never even went the distance in a championship fight nor won a notable fight late.

    This ends with Cooney in a heap and his handlers would go nowhere near signing up for it.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,478
    25,989
    Jan 3, 2007
    Weaver - shot and always a slow starter
    Witherspoon - threw the fight
    Tyson - Smith clinched
    Bruno - was kicking his ass before being caught against the ropes late
     
  14. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,015
    33,508
    Jan 14, 2022
    I wouldn't say Weaver was shot.

    Weaver was coming off a KO win over Carl Williams.

    Weaver also went the distance with Razor Ruddock straight after the Bonecrusher loss. And Weaver actually wobbled Ruddock quite badly and only lost a split decision.

    Witherspoon didn't throw the fight he came in unprepared and Bonecrusher did what he had to do and swarmed all over his opponent. Witherspoon did get his tooth knocked out so I don't believe he threw the fight.

    Yes Bonecrusher was losing to Bruno but he proved he could take punishment from a hard puncher and comeback.

    Cooney is not battled tested like Bonecrusher so I wouldn't favour him over a big durable puncher.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2025 at 2:41 AM
    he grant likes this.
  15. SouthpawsRule

    SouthpawsRule Active Member Full Member

    1,120
    1,364
    Jul 2, 2025
    Who knows, Cooney was a talented guy but they threw him in there with Holmes before he had a chance to hit past the “gifted, inexperienced prospect” phase and he was never the same.

    Smith was visibly a worse fighter but he was a grizzly old vet who fought against some of the highest-level HWs you’ll ever find and even pulled the win in unlikely situations a few times.

    I think Cooney would be winning this until Smith suddenly catches him out of nowhere and bombs him out.