I've seen a few folks over the years gush about the incredible performance Joshua gave in the second Usyk fight. Did we watch the same fight? It looked to me like Usyk continued to dominate in the center of the ring, impose his will, hurt Joshua, and comfortably outbox the lesser boxer. It kind of reminded me of, and this may shock some of the Joshua fans...Usyk-Joshua I. Please explain to me how this is a great performance. Some folks say this was "peak" Joshua, and that he would have beaten any man other than Usyk that night. What does it say if your best performance was a 10-2 loss where you could neither get the smaller, better man on the ropes for more than 30 seconds the whole fight, nor outbox him in the center of the ring? I've always been perplexed at fans latching on to this particular fight as an example of "peak" Joshua. It's a wide points loss where he couldn't do what he wanted to do because he wasn't allowed. Surely there's a better example? This content is protected
AJ's connect percentage was 19% in the first fight, and 25% in the rematch. Which is a marked improvement. It also helped that he wasn't badly rocked, whereas the first fight he was stunned countless times and almost KO'd in the 12th. Aside from Briedis, it's probably the best anyone has looked against Usyk. With AJ managing to outland him in three rounds and stay close in a few others. No one is saying he deserved to win or was amazing, but there's 80/20 dominant losses and 65-35 competitive losses. It was more the latter.
I thought he did better in the rematch though still lost cleary. It's true that you can still have a losing performance that can be commemded - especially against a true ATG. Though most, if not all fighters would prefer the win.
Exactly this. We saw his peak in a loss against an ATG. Any previous iteration of AJ was not ‘peak’ was it? It was raw and unafraid. II saw a more balanced and concentrated effort. This is probably what led to that outburst after. He had put so much into it, and still nothing!
Not amazing as he was soundly beaten again, but doing better in a rematch against a master technician like Usyk is no easy feat, ask Fury and Dubois.
Imho aj1 and aj2 were usyk,s best achievements in his hw career. Usyk faked a lowblow at aj1 , but beyond that it was a great performance .
I did, but in the context of it was amazing for a Joshua performance, I made no comparisons to anyone else. Tactically he improved tremendously and came in with a smart gameplan. That was Joshua at his absolute peak, he has never boxed a better fight in regards to technique and tactics - I will 100% die on this hill.
AJ improved his game plan from the first fight and managed to hurt Usyk a few times. Even though he still fell short he won more rounds and was competitive throughout. Just so happens that Usyk always finds a way to win even when he's in a closely fought match.
Joshua was rocked in the 10th, would've been very bad had it happened earlier in the fight. The performance in Usyk II was not better than the Fury fights (Usyk himself is very clear on this). Fury gave Usyk the toughest spell of his pro career in their first fight. You could even argue Chisora won more sloppy rounds than Joshua. People are indeed saying that Joshua's losing effort in Usyk II was amazing. It's fine to say he's slightly improved from the first fight, but to view a losing effort as some h2h beast "peak" version of a fighter is absurd. It's not like this is Vitali's loss against Lewis.
It wasn't amazing, but it was very good. Better than Fury did in a rematch, maybe even better than Fury in the first fight, since he wasn't bounced around like a pin ball. He actually outlanded Usyk in the first 9 rounds. But it doesn't matter anyway. Usyk let him gas out and whooped him good in the 10th, 11th and 12th.