Better P4P Fighter - Naz or Froch?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by TNSNO1878, Jan 17, 2026.


Froch or Naz?

  1. Hamed

  2. Froch

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. boxberry92

    boxberry92 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,621
    2,649
    Jun 22, 2008
    True, Froch was beaten and outclassed by Ward, and outboxed by Kessler first time, whereas Naz tripped over his ego on the way to the fridge.

    So many parallels between Toney and the Prince too. When Naz was kept busy like he was in those first couple of years after winning the belt (96–97), he rode the wave, similar to Toney. Once the gaps between fights got longer, so did all the traps and trappings of what they’d become. For the Barrera fight Naz “made weight” and that was pretty much it, and the documentary shows it clearly, no structure, no discipline, and no one willing to tell him no.

    Total delusion and ego running wild.
     
    VanBasten likes this.
  2. Kwabz

    Kwabz New Member Full Member

    7
    3
    Aug 8, 2025
    Froch
     
    yazooUK likes this.
  3. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,825
    2,983
    Aug 12, 2012
    Froch although Naz was far more talented.
     
  4. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,626
    20,684
    Jul 25, 2015
    Don't usually comment here but I just want to say that, in my personal opinion, Hamed is well overrated whilst Froch is slightly underrated.

    Hamed has a lot of unfavourable context regarding his wins (such as Kelley and Vasquez being active for 15+ years at lower weight classes by the time he fought them,). The best fighter he fought, Barrera, beat him clearly when Marco himself was past his absolute best. Whereas Froch fought a lot of top fighters in or near/just past their prime, winning nearly all of them and only decisively losing to a legitimate ATG.

    In a h2h sense, Hamed is massively vulnerable and would likely lose to nearly every single prime historical elite around his division h2h, whereas Froch has insane attributes that give him a chance with any man around his weight. Froch's intangibles also far outclass Hamed's. I just see him doing so much better against other elites around his range than Hamed does his.
     
  5. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Boxing Junkie

    10,077
    10,476
    Jan 20, 2010
    I'm a little bit biased towards Froch mainly because I followed his era a bit more closely then Naz's. Even to this day I struggle to comprehend how impressive Froch's resume is. I know he lost to Ward and the first Kessler fight, but damn! What a career he had.

    Jean Pascal (UK)
    Jermain Taylor (USA)
    Andre Dirrell ( UK)
    Mikkel Kessler (DEN)
    Arthur Abraham (FIN)
    Glen Johnson (USA)
    Andre Ward (USA)
    Lucian Bute (UK)
    Yusaf Mack (UK)
    Mikkel Kessler (UK)
    George Groves (UK)
    George Groves (UK)


    Ridiculous run, most of his Super 6 fights were on the road as well. Only one gimme and that was Mack.
     
  6. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran

    11,469
    14,958
    Mar 24, 2019
    An impressive list although i thought he lost to Dirrell
     
    Fisty_Cuffs_21 and ZiggyBowie like this.
  7. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,858
    9,271
    Apr 25, 2008
    In terms of consistently taking on the best around, that's as good a resume as most in the sport. A good few of those fights, Froch wasn't even favourite going into the fight, and outside of Mack, and to a lesser extent, an old Johnson and Groves I, most of the rest were either 50/50 or Froch being a slight favourite.

    He was an warrior!
     
    sniffmybadger likes this.
  8. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,858
    9,271
    Apr 25, 2008
    I had someone winning by one round, but I can't remember who now.

    I can understand Froch getting the nod, though. Defensively, Dirrell was brilliant that night. He highlighted all of the flaws in Froch's offense. Unfortunately, he barely let his hands go. It's all well and good making your opponent miss, but if you don't make them pay for their mistakes then it's hard to win rounds.

    My feeling after the fight was that Dirrell threw the fight away rather than Froch won it.
     
  9. boxberry92

    boxberry92 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,621
    2,649
    Jun 22, 2008
    Come on bro, you’re doing Marco a disservice. He went into the Naz fight fresh off Morales I, one of the greatest fights ever where plenty, me included, thought he was robbed, and he avenged that loss after Hamed, so he was right in his physical and mental prime. HBO even picked Barrera over Morales for that date for a reason.

    Are you British or a refugee from the General board?

    Beyond that, who’s better out of Froch or Hamed is totally subjective.
     
    Fisty_Cuffs_21 and VanBasten like this.
  10. ZiggyBowie

    ZiggyBowie Active Member Full Member

    602
    716
    Sep 17, 2022
    This, Froch was very very lucky that night.
     
    Noel857 likes this.
  11. Bob Flaps

    Bob Flaps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,452
    6,350
    Mar 30, 2019
    I thought it was a fair point to say neither of them are ATGs but were top class in their day.
     
    Noel857 likes this.
  12. ruffryders

    ruffryders Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,749
    1,235
    Oct 7, 2010
    Both multi times world champs with defences, if that doesn’t make you world class what does?
     
    Noel857 likes this.
  13. Special one

    Special one Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    1,180
    Mar 20, 2019
    Froch all day on chin alone!!
     
  14. delboy82

    delboy82 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,574
    6,454
    Feb 18, 2014
    If you are the best in the world at your weight your world class at that weight regardless of what that level was in different eras or different weights
     
  15. delboy82

    delboy82 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,574
    6,454
    Feb 18, 2014
    ignore mark, he also thinks that both beterbiev and bivol are average boxers.
     
    Noel857 likes this.