Boxers or ex boxers who are terrible analysts

Tim Bradley n Sergio mora come to mind

 

Only a clown on a boxing forum thinks they know more about boxing than boxers ffs lol

 

Tim Bradley instantly comes to mind

 

It’s not about knowledge or experience , commentating is about communication

 

On the other end Paulie was great the few fights he did for sky in UK love to know why he doesn't get more jobs

 

Lennox Lewis

 

Me too. Think we're in the minority on here though.

 

Tarver is a good broadcaster tho, I always liked him. He is good at play-by-play but not so much at color commentary.

 

George Foreman. Lennox Lewis. Love George but he said so much obvious stuff or nonsense.

 

Nonsense lol

 

Spencer Fearon. A guy who has certain bias and doesn’t really try to hide it, let’s just say.

 

Shout out for David Haye who Is both terrible and incredibly annoying.

 

Back in the Box nation days, he wasn't that bad

 

andre ward always starts rambling about weird pseudoscientific arm chair psychology. 2 guys are fighting and he starts talking about big brothers and little brothers and sigmund freud like he didnt just beat people in the balls his entire career

 

I think some former fighter broadcaster, announcer, analysts etc have their niches

I don't like Tim Bradley as an announcer but I like his articles on ESPN

I like SergioMora better on the on the Mannix-Mora podcast than as a ringside commentator

I saw Tarver mentioned, I thought he was pretty good on SHO and is still good on his YT channel. (I don't watch it religiously)

I saw Malik Scott on this thread, I thought his break down on Ring Mags YT channel was pretty good for Stevenson-Lopez

I am not really a fan of Sugar Ray Leonard's commentary and Ray Mancini who I respect as a fighter was not the best either

Lennox Lewis was prone to making gaffes but I thought when he called major heavyweight fights his analysis and insight was interesting to me