Floyd Mayweather Jr vs Ray Robinson's opposition, how would he have fared?

Over their whole careers, Floyd is more consistent because he didn't lose - but he also had 50 fights in 19 years. Robinson was much more consistent at his peak, hence why he was 133-3-2 over 12 years, having beaten all but one man with one of the longest win streaks in history. I don't even see how that's up for debate.

Dominance is just obviously Robinson. It's one thing to make someone miss and start looking foolish; it's much more dominant to knock the best in the world out.

There's 13 rounds of it against LaMotta.

 

50 and zero over 19 years and five weightclasses is more dominant than Robinson's numbers.

 

130 - 154 = 135 to 160. 133-2-2 in 12 years > 50-0 over 19.

Nothing about the counter punching? Coz it'd involve actually watching something?

 

Floyd's medal at 126 is worth more than whatever Robinson did at 135 (nothing).

 

Beating the #3 and #1 Lightweight in the world is nothing ? By today's standards such body of work would get you in the P4P top 10

 

Furthermore, Sammy Angott is a top 20 all time LW (#13 on my list).

 

Beat an ATG 3x mate. That's more than Floyd did at 135.

 

Your act must be even tiring for you at this point.

 

Let us not forget Diego Corrales got ranked top 5 P4P for beating the #3 rated Roberto Garcia and #2 rated Angel Manfredy. I don't recall Mayweather getting ranked top 5 P4P by winning a bronze medal.

 

Show me where he beat Angott at 135?