This is a question I’ve thought about often, but I’ve never really come up with an answer I’m satisfied with. Including only fights, which took place in the 1930s who was the second best heavyweight of the decade behind the Brown Bomber, Joe Louis? There are a good number of men with relatively similar resumes, achievements, and in some cases championship reigns. While I do think that Schmeling may have beaten them all I have never been able to really separate them out. What say you?
here is an EBU 1939 World's Ratings. it is the end of the Decade, but most of the Fighters Rated have been around at least a few years prior. This content is protected
This is very interesting, not only for the heavyweights, but for the other classes as well. I haven’t even heard of the heavyweight from New Zealand. Not that I’m an expert on 1930s boxing but I’ve heard of most of the good guys. I think that one of the things that makes the 1930s so difficult is that almost all of the heavies including Louis we’re only very good or great for part of the decade. No one really was top-notch throughout the decade. Thank you very much for posting this.
very interesting choices. You have Braddock, the Cinderella Man, given the nickname for his lack of success before he won the belt and two guys who were never champion. I’d love to know your reasoning for these choices
I know what you mean. I can't really place anyone above those two guy's (apart from Louis obviously) in that era . I find it hard to separate them tbh.
My take, only for fights in the decade; 1 Louis 2 Schmeling 3 Sharkey 4 Carnera 5 M.Baer 6 Loughran 7 Schaaf 8 Stribling 9 Hamas 10 Braddock 11 Pastor 12 Uzcudun 13 K.Levinsky 14 M.Walker 15 Mann 16 Ramage 17 Godoy 18 Nova 19 Farr 20 Lovell 21 Rosenbloom 22 Lewis 23 Lasky 24 Fox 25 Retzlaff 26 Neusel 27 Poreda 28 B.Baer 29 Burman 30 Risko 31 Galento 32 Toles 33 Griffith 34 Gains 35 Trammel 36 Blunt 37 O.Walker 38 Barlund 39 Adamick 40 Ettore 41 Reddish 42 Haynes 43 Massera 44 Knox 45 Paycheck 46 Winstone 47 Dudas 48 Strickland 49 Godfrey 50 Hankinson
Quite the list you've made. Ernie Schaaf usually flies under the radar but, in the 1930s, he had a lot of good wins and very few losses. Excellent list.
Braddock was fighting underweight most of his career and was terribly mismanaged. Braddock finished his career 7-1 with the Louis loss and wins over 3 of my top 5. If Braddock was fighting at 195 pounds he could have been the guy between Tunney and Louis. Braddocks career is kind of WLW. He had two great runs with a bad run in between. Its very easy to compartmentalize his career into 3 chapters. While John Henry Lewis was the LHW champ hes probably got the 2nd deepest HW resume of the era and was kinda a psuedo champion during the Braddock years with many of his HW fights designated 15 rounders. Tommy Farr is more of a potential pick but I still think he showed enough to edge out Max Baer for 5th. I would pick him over a Baer or Schmeling. He was arguably the best British HW of the century before Lennox. Schmelings resume if you take away the Louis win has a lot of problems that normally get called out. But the Louis win makes it all go away.
now that's commitment, I can't comment beyond the list above for 39, though I loosely thought 'possible' Farr and I always wondered about Toles, Burman and Nova.