Rico Verhoeven vs Oleksandr Usyk official for WBC Heavyweight Championship — May 23 in Egypt (DAZN)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxerMaurits, Feb 2, 2026.


Who would win?

  1. Rico Verhoeven

    10.6%
  2. Oleksandr Usyk

    89.4%
  1. Joeywill

    Joeywill Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,292
    3,118
    Aug 2, 2021
    This would be like an employing coming in 10 min early everyday, winning employee of the month every month, and then stealin 1 million dollars.
     
  2. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,485
    2,177
    Nov 23, 2014
    Any boxing fan would take an Usyk that fights 3 times a year over one that fights once a year regardless of deck stacking or ped allegations

    That surely would be enough to compensate for shenanigans in terms of deck stacking which often don't work anyway
     
  3. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    83,837
    139,178
    Jul 21, 2009
    What an absolutely ridiculous analogy :risas3::facepalm:
     
  4. mrbigshot

    mrbigshot Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,713
    1,177
    Oct 29, 2021
    Its a forum full of usyk fanboys and nothing more . Nothing is honorable if he does not perform a drastic course change .
     
  5. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    14,446
    11,236
    Jul 30, 2012
    Usyk requested this farce against a 1-0 opponent be for the WBC title. He specifically requested it be for the title!

    WTF?
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.
  6. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    15,124
    19,430
    Mar 17, 2018
    I dunno, there's 1 huge hater on here
     
  7. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    15,124
    19,430
    Mar 17, 2018
    I just read about that

    Oh dear
     
    like a boss likes this.
  8. Pepsi Dioxide

    Pepsi Dioxide Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,296
    13,859
    Oct 22, 2020
    The WBC sanctioning this is so funny

    So if Verhoven drops out can we have LeBron James fight for the WBC title? He's accomplished so much in his sport and he's 6'9 250 pound giant.
     
  9. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,413
    42,261
    Jul 4, 2014
    I've never understood this logic. Why wouldn't it otherwise be for the championship? Uysk is the champion. He's fighting a boxing match. If Verhouven beats him, why wouldn't he be champion?
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2026
    kirk likes this.
  10. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    14,446
    11,236
    Jul 30, 2012
    You don't know what a non-title fight is then?
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.
  11. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,413
    42,261
    Jul 4, 2014
    I know what it is, but I don't approve of the concept. If Verhhoeven beat Usyk, why wouldn't he be the champ? So now you have a champ that isn;'t as good as someone else?
     
  12. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    14,446
    11,236
    Jul 30, 2012
    Non-title fights have been around a lot longer than you or I have. They are what they are and Usyk could have fought a non-title fight with his 1-0 challenger. Instead Usyk REQUESTED it be a title fight. It's on him.
     
  13. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,413
    42,261
    Jul 4, 2014
    So were slavery and human sacrifice. I don't approve of those, either.
     
  14. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    14,446
    11,236
    Jul 30, 2012
    A non-title fight was a valid option and that's what a 1-0 challenger should have received but Usyk REQUESTED it be a title fight. It's on him.
     
    mrbigshot likes this.
  15. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,413
    42,261
    Jul 4, 2014
    sure, but what is on him? Insisting that a guy who is fighting him has a shot at being champ? I fail to see how that is dishonorable, or how not giving him the shot would be honorable.