Do you consider Floyd Patterson still the youngest Heavyweight Champion? Personally I see him as offically the youngest Lineal Heavweight champion and Mike Tyson as the youngest Heavyweight Title Champion. Is there a difference? If Tyson had fought Michael Spinks in 1986 could he have become the youngest Lineal Heavyweight Champion? Spinks refused to fight Tony Tucker for the IBF Heavyweight Title so it became vacant and him and Buster Douglas fought it and later Tyson beat Tucker for the IBF title.
John L. Sullivan was younger than Patterson when he (sorta) TKO’d the reigning champion Joe Goss in the second round of their April 1880 bout that was framed as a gloved exhibition. I don’t think I’ve ever seen it used as a claim in these debates, though.
That's quite interesting. He won the American Heavyweight title beating Paddy Ryan in 1882 but didn't offically become World Heavyweight Champion until beating Dominik MCafferey in 1885? some historians don't have him as offical World Heavyweight Champion until he beats Jake Kilrain in 1889 and then loses the title to James J Corbett in 1892. https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php/Lineal_Heavyweight_Champion
Boxrec’s all over the place with regard to that era of boxing history, the McCaffrey fight didn’t add much if anything to Sullivan’s claim. The latest you could say he won the world title is 1883 imo; when he beat Charlie Mitchell to combine the American and British belts. Still, I think his win over Ryan 1882 and his kinda-sorta win over Goss solidified who the world champion was. Well, aside from the Australian belt which is a whole other story lol
I'm like you mate, I see Floyd as the lineal champ, Tyson the youngest to hold an official title. I think Tyson could have definitely defeated Spinks in 86 too.