I understand that it has to do with the way the rounds break out, but overall, the punch count does not support the idea that Rico was far ahead: Oleksandr Usyk landed 112 of 499 total punches (22.4%), while Rico Verhoeven landed 113 of 508 total punches (22.2%). Verhoeven held a narrow advantage in power punches (93 to 89), while Usyk held the edge in jabs (23 to 20) in the 11-round bout. And let's not forget that it was Usyk standing over Rico, tonight.
It wasn't as wide as the scorecard that the one guy had it from Ring Magazine. But I felt Rico was definitely ahead he was the effective aggressor and bullied Usyk along the ropes. I think Rico being about 6-4 ahead going into the 11th round was about right. I don't see a case for Usyk being level though after 10 rounds sorry I just don't see it personally. Yes Usyk probably would've stopped Rico in the 12th round. But the stoppage was totally bogus the bell had already rung before the referee jumped in. I think Rico fought his heart out and deserved a chance to see if he could see out the 12th round.
Cope. Rico was way ahead. Usyk won 3-4 rounds max. (Including the 11th). He needed a stoppage to win.
The thing is, of course there are official criteria for scoring a boxing fight. Effective aggression, punches landed, effective defense, control of the ring, sure. But one prominent judge who I believe has been retired for a good long while though basically said "who would you have rather been in that round?" is a valid criteria. Meaning, who felt worse after the round ended? And I would think that Usyk felt that a lot more often today than Verhoeven.
He outlanded Usyk in power punches 7 rounds to 3, while being the one pressing the action. Landing a couple extra non effective jabs while backpeddling do not necessarily win Usyk most of those rounds. 7 to 3.
Usyk was blocking a lot of the punches with his gloves, and Rico was missing a lot. Notice Usyk's face is not marked up.