Are champions like Wlad, Manny Pacquiao, Canelo... disappearing?

The sport of boxing is at an all time low. The big names like before are gone or on the way out. There's not many marketable fighters like there used to be.

 

Yes that was the last dance of activity for the most part.

 

Who was Canelo fighting in his first 30 fights, he wasn't exactly taking on contenders was he.

 

I never saw what was so good with Canelo. GGG beat him twice. Bivol bounced him Bud buried him and Mayweather schooled him.

Overrated as anything.

 

It's better to not have 50-60 fights, that's why we're seeing guys fight until their late 30's and still be in their prime ish - Crawford, Usyk, Beterbiev etc, would rather these guys have 10-15 world tittle / meaningful fights than fight 40 tomato cans in nothing fights, like Mungia was doing.

 

People are getting paid more now, no reason to stay in the game that long if there's no need to

 

The common denominator with Wlad and Manny is also being forgiven for a few losses before they made it. And avoiding losses is the main thing driving this.

No one's had a full career yet under this "culture" so it really hasn't settled yet what that would look like. But I'm thinking 20 fights is a short career, 30 is an average career and 40 is a long career. Haney and Ennis are on track to reach 50 fights if they contend another decade. They might be the last ones.

There's a lot of guys like Bowe get poo poohed for what "they could have done" and wasted potential and going forward it's going to be hard to do that when so few greats get 40 wins. No one's fighting more than one or two serious opponents before their title shot and Bowe's pre title resume especially has went from above average to historic.

 

Ennis is not like Wlad or Manny. Hes closer to Peter Quillin w his ducking ass.

Inoue will have around 40 fights but hes fought top guys for so long one can really appreciate what hes done, same with Usyk. Inoue, Usyk, and Crawford have -zero ducks - impressive as all hell.

 

Canelo benefited from crooked judges and referees due to his promoter more than any fighter I can think of. The draw scorecard in the Mayweather fight was laughable and outright corruption on the highest level of the scale.

 

I agree mate. Well said.

 

- Wlad was 34-1 when he fought for his first World title against Chris Byrd. Before that he mostly fought nobodies.
- Pacquiao was 23-1 when he fought for his first Fly World title against Chatchai Sasakul, and then 32-2 when he fought for his first Super Bantam World title against Lehlo Ledwaba, which was his US debute and arguably first notable fight. Before that most of his fights were local in Philippines.
- Canelo was 35-0-1 when he fought for his first Super Welter title against Matthew Hatton.
_______________

Now, let's look at those "modern" fighters:
- Bivol was 11-0 when he fought Trent Broadhurst. He was promoted from interim to full WBA champion before this fight.
- Beterviev was 11-0 when he won his first world title against Enrico Koelling.
- Usyk was 9-0 when he defeated Krzysztof Glowacki for his first world title.
- Crawford was 22-0 when he defeated Ricky Burns and have 42 fights in total, so not sure he fits the narrative.

So, basically, these fighters spend less time developing their career and padding their records before they get to title fights.

 

Canelo was 19 years old by the time of his 30th fight, I don't think this is the knock on him you believe it to be.
And the man is about to enter his 28th title fight.

 

Bivol was 26 when he beat Trent, and he won the regular WBA title, so this honestly should not be included.
Beterbiev was 32.
Usyk was 29 - he however was also a 2x Olympian and most certainly got rushed as a pro.
Crawford was 26 - he was the slowest of the bunch to get to a title shot, as it took him 6 years. For comparison, it also took Canelo 6 years to get hist first title shot.

 

Boxing has always been about the money. That is why they called it prizefighting in the first place. The purse came before the poetry, and the risk came wrapped in a dollar sign. From bare knuckles in smoke filled rooms to the bright lights of Las Vegas, the fight game has always known exactly what it is, even when the rest of the world likes to dress it up. The only thing that changes in boxing is the scenery and the excuses.

Once upon a time, a fighter earned his name the hard way. Not with followers, but with fists. Not with hashtags, but with hard rounds in tougher neighbourhoods. You came up through the amateurs, paid your dues, and fought men who were not there to make you look good. They were there to take your head off and your place along with it. Back then, a record was not just a number. It was a story, and sometimes a warning. Now, respect has a new landlord, and it collects rent in clicks.

Today, a fighter can be as famous for what he says as for what he does. Social media is the new ticket window, and sometimes the loudest voice gets the biggest purse. The proving ground has shifted from the gym to the screen, from twelve hard rounds to thirty quick seconds that can circle the globe before the sweat dries and here is the truth that sticks in the throat of every old timer. It works like a charm.

More than ever, fighters can make serious money facing opponents who are there for the paycheque and little else. No hopers, the kind of fellows who look dangerous on paper until the bell rings and reality clocks in. It is risk management in silk gloves. Pick carefully, earn generously, and live to sell another night because when you scrape away the hype, the noise, and the pay per view glitter, the equation stays the same. The punches are real. The damage is real. And the man taking them home pays the bill.
So yes, if it were your chin on the line, you might think twice about volunteering for trouble.

And here is where the past and present part company in a way you can measure without a stopwatch.

Champions used to reign. Now they visit.

Joe Louis held the heavyweight title like a landlord who never missed a payment, twenty five defenses, each one a declaration that the throne was occupied and not up for discussion. Muhammad Ali fought killers in gloves, men who would have been champions in any other era, and he did it under a spotlight that never dimmed. Larry Holmes kept the belt through years when every challenger had bad intentions and a good chance.

Those men did not look for the right moment to leave. They dared someone to make them.

Today, a championship can feel more like a layover than a lifetime appointment. The smart play is to get in, get paid, and get out before the wear and tear turns a champion into a cautionary tale. Legacy takes a back seat to longevity, and longevity is often measured in bank statements instead of title defenses.

Pay per view and the casual fan have rewritten the script. The public does not always demand the best fight the best. They want a show. They want something that feels big, even if the danger is carefully controlled behind the curtain. And the promoters, who have always known which side of the bread the butter falls on, are more than happy to sell the sizzle, with or without the steak.

So boxing does what it has always done. It walks that thin line between sport and business, between greatness and good timing. The names change. The platforms change. The numbers get bigger, louder, and harder to ignore but the truth sits there like an old referee who has seen it all and is not impressed. Follow the money, and you will find boxing, still swinging, exactly where it has always been.