The WBA won't recognize the bridgerweight division anymore

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Chuck Norris, Jun 19, 2026.


  1. thehook13

    thehook13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,618
    8,627
    Nov 2, 2011
    Common sense prevails
     
    PopPellegrino and PusherII like this.
  2. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    83,901
    139,313
    Jul 21, 2009
    They won't recognize the bridgerweight division but they will recognize 3 WBA champions per division :facepalm:
     
  3. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,360
    5,697
    Mar 8, 2008
    Nothing wrong with the BW division

    Just not enough fighters in it, sadly
     
  4. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,425
    42,285
    Jul 4, 2014
  5. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,502
    11,208
    Jun 5, 2010
    :confused:
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  6. PusherII

    PusherII Full Member

    50
    87
    Dec 10, 2025
    What we really need is a division between 175 and 200 lbs, that gap is massive, no one ever needed a Bridgerweight
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  7. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,808
    34,950
    Oct 12, 2010
    Guess you can say that the WBA burned that Bridge (-rweight)
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  8. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,425
    42,285
    Jul 4, 2014
  9. PopPellegrino

    PopPellegrino Active Member Full Member

    599
    664
    Feb 21, 2026
    The problem is that the organizations changed the heavyweight limit from 190+ pounds to 200+ pounds. That turned cruiserweight into a division full of dehydrated heavyweights instead of fighters who were genuinely too big for light heavyweight but too small for heavyweight, like Haye and De Leon. If they moved the heavyweight limit back to 190 pounds, I think both the light heavyweight and heavyweight divisions would flourish.
     
  10. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,360
    5,697
    Mar 8, 2008
    But the gap between 200 and heavy is 224 aka BW, which is fine but it never got popular
     
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,877
    17,139
    Jul 19, 2004
    Heavyweight is unlimited, it does not have an upper limit (and it also does not have a lower limit). But in the spirit of what you're saying, I agree - changing cruiserweight from 190 to 200 was a very bad decision.
     
    PopPellegrino and catchwtboxing like this.
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,521
    13,322
    Jan 6, 2007
    NO !

    It was a ****ing dreadful idea....more belts, more money for the ABC organizations.

    I grudgingly accept the cruiserweight division, but bridgerweight ?

    GTFOutta here with that nonsense !
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  13. GoodBot

    GoodBot You can like, just forget your password. Full Member

    2,364
    2,953
    Jan 25, 2026
    I get this sentiment, but I still find myself thinking that the gap from 175 to 200 is too much. It should be 175, 190, 210+, or just 175, 190, 190+.

    190 means that some of the smaller 175lb guys will be able to move up, while at the same time guarantees that the lazy heavyweights either fight at heavyweight or they trim themselves down and get into proper shape. Guys like Michael Hunter, for example.

    I believe most of the current heavyweight crop could easily make 220, which makes me think 210 would be a nice addition if there were still a 190.

    It should be:
    105
    112
    126
    135
    147
    160
    175
    190
    210
    210+

    105 I think has a place in the sport, because some of the guys really are that small, especially with the day before weigh-ins.
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  14. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    6,025
    Jan 6, 2024
    Upon further reflection I think the WBA isn't doing a great job at the moment and this might be what's best for Bridgerweight. Bridgerweight would be better off with the IBF or WBO as their 2nd sanctioning body. The WBA of this era is not competent enough to pilot a new weight class and did a much worse job than the WBC.
     
  15. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    6,025
    Jan 6, 2024
    The elephant of the room is boxing refusing to change the weight limits of established divisions. This was a better solution than tweener divsions which siphon talent from the original weight classes.

    I think BW is a better idea than CW because BW only serves as a HW B league and doesn't effect LHW at all. No one with serious ambitions of dominating HW will go to CW/BW unless they see dominating that weight class as a shortcut to HW. While CW serves as a HW B league that siphons off big LHWs. If LHW's go up you want them to go to HW. No LHW who can make it at HW will go to BW. 225 might as well be the same thing. But plenty will got to CW.

    HW's in general could all be lighter but the current collective wisdom is that non HW's cut as light as they can go and HW's bulk as heavy as they can go.
     
    GoodBot likes this.